| Literature DB >> 31450604 |
Ahmad Assi1, Stefania Federici1, Fabjola Bilo1, Annalisa Zacco1, Laura E Depero1, Elza Bontempi2.
Abstract
Mineral carbonation, involving reactions of alkaline earth oxides with CO2, has received great attention, as a potential carbon dioxide sequestration technology. Indeed, once converted into mineral carbonate, CO2 can be permanently stored in an inert phase. Several studies have been focalized to the utilization of industrial waste as a feedstock and the reuse of some by-products as possible materials for the carbonation reactions. In this work municipal solid waste incineration fly ash and other ashes, as bottom ash, coal fly ash, flue gas desulphurization residues, and silica fume, are stabilized by low-cost technologies. In this context, the CO2 is used as a raw material to favor the chemical stabilization of the wastes, by taking advantage of the pH reduction. Four different stabilization treatments at room temperature are performed and the carbonation reaction evaluated for three months. The crystalline calcium carbonate phase was quantified by the Rietveld analysis of X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns. Results highlight that the proposed stabilization strategy promotes CO2 sequestration, with the formation of different calcium carbonate phases, depending on the wastes. This new sustainable and promising technology can be an alternative to more onerous mineral carbonation processes for the carbon dioxide sequestration.Entities:
Keywords: carbon dioxide sequestration; fly ash; municipal solid waste incineration; stabilization
Year: 2019 PMID: 31450604 PMCID: PMC6747609 DOI: 10.3390/ma12172714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Samples description. MSWI FA: municipal solid waste incineration-fly ash; CFA: Coal Fly Ash; FGD: Flue Gas Desulphurization.
| Samples | MSWI FA | CFA | FGD | Silica | MSWI-BA | %MSWI | %FGD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 130 | 30 | 40 | 20 | - | 59.1 | 18.2 |
| B | 130 | 30 | - | - | 20 | 72.2 | - |
| C | 130 | 30 | 40 | - | 20 | 59.1 | 18.2 |
| D | 130 | 30 | 40 | - | - | 65 | 20 |
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of MSWI FA, CFA, FGD residues, and MSWI BA.
Concentration of Zn and Pb in leaching solution of ashes and stabilized samples after one and two months. Results are reported as the average ± standard deviation of three TXRF measurements. Data about MSWI FA, BA, CFA, and FGD residues do not change in the two months.
| Samples | pH | Months | Elemental Concentration (mg/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zn | Pb | |||||||
| MWSI-FA | 12.18 | - | 8.80 | ± | 4.30 | 34.60 | ± | 2.40 |
| MWSI-BA | 10.69 | - | 0.05 | ± | 0.04 | 0.09 | ± | 0.05 |
| CFA | 11.81 | - | 0.24 | ± | 0.02 | 0.13 | ± | 0.03 |
| FGD | 12.68 | - | 0.1 | ± | 0.04 | <LOD | ||
| A | 11.73 | 1 | 0.15 | ± | 0.09 | <LOD | ||
| 8.92 | 2 | 0.11 | ± | 0.01 | <LOD | |||
| B | 12.22 | 1 | 1.52 | ± | 0.19 | 12.20 | ± | 0.70 |
| 10.23 | 2 | 0.14 | ± | 0.00 | <LOD | |||
| C | 12.06 | 1 | 0.39 | ± | 0.02 | 3.20 | ± | 0.50 |
| 10.37 | 2 | 0.07 | ± | 0.01 | <LOD | |||
| D | 12.22 | 1 | 0.80 | ± | 0.40 | 6.40 | ± | 1.60 |
| 11.07 | 2 | 0.07 | ± | 0.001 | <LOD | |||
Figure 2XRD pattern and corresponding Rietveld refined profile made on stabilized sample A, one month after the sample synthesis. Difference curve is also plotted.
Results of Rietveld analysis at different aging times (semi-quantitative analysis).
| Samples | Months | Amorphous (%) | Calcite (%) | Hannebachite (%) | Thaumasite (%) | Gypsum (%) | Quartz (%) | Vaterite (%) | Sylvite (%) | Halite (%) | Anhydrite (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample A | 0 | 6 * | |||||||||
| 1 | 69 | 12 | 5 | <1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1.5 | 69 | 17 | 4 | <1 | 3 | <1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| 2 | 67 | 17 | 5 | <1 | <1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| 2.5 | 63 | 19 | 5 | <1 | <1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| 3 | 63 | 20 | 4 | <1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Sample B | 0 | 11* | |||||||||
| 1 | 72 | 14 | 2 | <1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | <1 | |
| 1.5 | 70 | 16 | <1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | <1 | |
| 2 | 67 | 17 | <1 | <1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | <1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 2.5 | 67 | 17 | <1 | <1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 64 | 19 | 3 | <1 | 2 | <1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Sample C | 0 | 9* | |||||||||
| 1 | 69 | 13 | 6 | <1 | 1 | <1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
| 1.5 | 70 | 16 | 5 | <1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| 2 | 69 | 16 | 4 | <1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2.5 | 63 | 19 | 4 | <1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 64. | 20 | 3 | <1 | 1 | <1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
| Sample D | 0 | 7* | |||||||||
| 1 | 66 | 14 | 7 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 2 | 2. | 3 | 4 | |
| 1.5 | 65 | 21 | 6 | <1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2 | 65 | 18 | 6 | <1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | <1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 2.5 | 63 | 22 | 5 | <1 | <1 | 2 | 3 | <1 | 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 61 | 20 | 4 | <1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
* indicates the amount of calcite present in the mixed powders, before reaction (month 0). It represents the natural carbonation contribution.
Figure 3Amount of amorphous, evaluated by Rietveld method, as a function of samples aging time.
Figure 4Amount of crystalline calcium carbonate phases (calcite and vaterite), evaluated as a global calcium carbonate crystalline phases (a) and separately (b). These data were calculated by Rietveld method, in respect to corresponding amorphous content.