| Literature DB >> 29679825 |
Margarida J Quina1, Elza Bontempi2, Anna Bogush3, Stefan Schlumberger4, Gisela Weibel5, Roberto Braga6, Valerio Funari7, Jiri Hyks8, Erik Rasmussen9, Jakob Lederer10.
Abstract
Environmental policies in the European Union focus on the prevention of hazardous waste and aim to mitigate its impact on human health and ecosystems. However, progress is promoting a shift in perspective from environmental impacts to resource recovery. Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) has been increasing in developed countries, thus the amount of air pollution control residues (APCr) and fly ashes (FA) have followed the same upward trend. APCr from MSWI is classified as hazardous waste in the List of Waste (LoW) and as an absolute entry (19 01 07*), but FA may be classified as a mirror entry (19 0 13*/19 01 14). These properties arise mainly from their content in soluble salts, potentially toxic metals, trace organic pollutants and high pH in contact with water. Since these residues have been mostly disposed of in underground and landfills, other possibilities must be investigated to recover secondary raw materials and products. According to the literature, four additional routes of recovery have been found: detoxification (e.g. washing), product manufacturing (e.g. ceramic products and cement), practical applications (e.g. CO2 sequestration) and recovery of materials (e.g. Zn and salts). This work aims to identify the best available technologies for material recovery in order to avoid landfill solutions. Within this scope, six case studies are presented and discussed: recycling in lightweight aggregates, glass-ceramics, cement, recovery of zinc, rare metals and salts. Finally, future perspectives are provided to advance understanding of this anthropogenic waste as a source of resources, yet tied to safeguards for the environment.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution control residues; Fly ash; Incineration; Municipal solid waste; Recovery; Toxic metals
Year: 2018 PMID: 29679825 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963