Erin M Gibson1, Michelle Monje1,2,3,4,5. 1. Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences. 2. Department of Pathology. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Cancer Institute. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 5. Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Modern innovations in cancer therapy have dramatically increased the number of cancer survivors. An unfortunately frequent side-effect of cancer treatment is enduring neurological impairment. Persistent deficits in attention, concentration, memory, and speed of information processing afflict a substantial fraction of cancer survivors following completion of these life-saving therapies. Here, we highlight chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) and discuss the current understanding of mechanisms underlying CRCI. RECENT FINDINGS: New studies emphasize the deleterious impact of chemotherapeutic agents on glial-glial and neuron-glial interactions that shape the form, function and plasticity of the central nervous system. An emerging theme in cancer therapy-related cognitive impairment is therapy-induced microglial activation and consequent dysfunction of both neural precursor cells and mature neural cell types. Recent work has highlighted the complexity of dysregulated intercellular interactions involving oligodendrocyte lineage cells, microglia, astrocytes, and neurons following exposure to traditional cancer therapies such as methotrexate. This new understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of CRCI has elucidated potential therapeutic interventions, including colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition, TrkB agonism, and aerobic exercise. SUMMARY: Traditional cancer therapies induce lasting alterations to multiple neural cell types. Therapy-induced microglial activation is a critical component of the cause of CRCI, contributing to dysregulation of numerous processes of neural plasticity. Therapeutic targeting of microglial activation or the consequent dysregulation of neural plasticity mechanisms are emerging.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Modern innovations in cancer therapy have dramatically increased the number of cancer survivors. An unfortunately frequent side-effect of cancer treatment is enduring neurological impairment. Persistent deficits in attention, concentration, memory, and speed of information processing afflict a substantial fraction of cancer survivors following completion of these life-saving therapies. Here, we highlight chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) and discuss the current understanding of mechanisms underlying CRCI. RECENT FINDINGS: New studies emphasize the deleterious impact of chemotherapeutic agents on glial-glial and neuron-glial interactions that shape the form, function and plasticity of the central nervous system. An emerging theme in cancer therapy-related cognitive impairment is therapy-induced microglial activation and consequent dysfunction of both neural precursor cells and mature neural cell types. Recent work has highlighted the complexity of dysregulated intercellular interactions involving oligodendrocyte lineage cells, microglia, astrocytes, and neurons following exposure to traditional cancer therapies such as methotrexate. This new understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of CRCI has elucidated potential therapeutic interventions, including colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition, TrkB agonism, and aerobic exercise. SUMMARY: Traditional cancer therapies induce lasting alterations to multiple neural cell types. Therapy-induced microglial activation is a critical component of the cause of CRCI, contributing to dysregulation of numerous processes of neural plasticity. Therapeutic targeting of microglial activation or the consequent dysregulation of neural plasticity mechanisms are emerging.
Authors: Philipp Karschnia; Justin T Jordan; Deborah A Forst; Isabel C Arrillaga-Romany; Tracy T Batchelor; Joachim M Baehring; Nathan F Clement; L Nicolas Gonzalez Castro; Aline Herlopian; Marcela V Maus; Michaela H Schwaiblmair; Jacob D Soumerai; Ronald W Takvorian; Ephraim P Hochberg; Jeffrey A Barnes; Jeremy S Abramson; Matthew J Frigault; Jorg Dietrich Journal: Blood Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: David P Jarmolowicz; Rachel Gehringer; Shea M Lemley; Michael J Sofis; Sam Kaplan; Michael A Johnson Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Naomi Lomeli; Kaijun Di; Jennifer Czerniawski; John F Guzowski; Daniela A Bota Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Die Zhang; Wei Zhou; Thanh Thai Lam; Connie Weng; Lawrence Bronk; Duo Ma; Qiang Wang; Joseph G Duman; Patrick M Dougherty; David R Grosshans Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Heather M Conklin; Raja B Khan; Wilburn E Reddick; Susan Helton; Ronald Brown; Scott C Howard; Melanie Bonner; Robbin Christensen; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Raymond K Mulhern Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2007-06-14
Authors: Giovana R Onzi; Nathalia D'Agustini; Solange C Garcia; Silvia S Guterres; Paula R Pohlmann; Daniela D Rosa; Adriana R Pohlmann Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Vivian Huang; Lynda Mackin; Kord M Kober; Steven M Paul; Bruce A Cooper; Yvette P Conley; Marilyn J Hammer; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Rafael de la Hoz-Camacho; Ana Luisa Rivera-Lazarín; Jose Manuel Vázquez-Guillen; Diana Caballero-Hernández; Edgar Mendoza-Gamboa; Ana Carolina Martínez-Torres; Cristina Rodríguez-Padilla Journal: EXCLI J Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 4.068