Literature DB >> 31447945

A comparison of the minimum data sets for primary shoulder arthroplasty between national shoulder arthroplasty registries. Is international harmonization feasible?

Ricardo Aveledo1, Phillip Holland1, Michael Thomas2, Fiona Ashton1, Amar Rangan1,3,4.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to identify the common components of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) of current national shoulder arthroplasty registries that could be pooled for analysis; and to determine whether further harmonisation of data collection across these registries would be feasible. Copies of primary shoulder arthroplasty MDS forms, annual reports, and other publications from national shoulder arthroplasty registries were identified using internet search engines up to November 2016. Data relating to local or regional registries was excluded. There were nine national shoulder arthroplasty registries reporting a total of 97,388 primary shoulder replacements. All minimum data sets included patient identifiers, date of surgery, implant identification, laterality of surgery, indication and mode of implant fixation. At least 6 registries had common options within the categories of indication, implant fixation and previous operations. Most discrepancies were seen in categories for additional interventions, outcome measures, and intra-operative complications. As numbers within individual registries are relatively small, international collaboration would harness the global strength of knowledge and experience in shoulder replacement. Several similarities were identified between the current national registries that could become unified with only minor changes by a few registries, highlighting the potential feasibility of MDS harmonisat.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; arthroplasty registry; international harmonization; shoulder

Year:  2018        PMID: 31447945      PMCID: PMC6688150          DOI: 10.1177/1758573218755569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  16 in total

1.  The type of cement and failure of total hip replacements.

Authors:  B Espehaug; O Furnes; L I Havelin; L B Engesaeter; S E Vollset
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-08

Review 2.  A review of national shoulder and elbow joint replacement registries.

Authors:  Jeppe V Rasmussen; Bo S Olsen; Bjørg-Tilde S Fevang; Ove Furnes; Eerik T Skytta; Hans Rahme; Björn Salomonsson; Khalid D Mohammed; Richard S Page; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 3.  Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).

Authors:  Felix Angst; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; André Aeschlimann; Beat R Simmen; Jörg Goldhahn
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 4.  [Detection of inferior products in arthroplasty and implementation of findings: a retrospective analysis of the Boneloc incident].

Authors:  M Liebensteiner; W Janda; A Williams; W Pawelka; G Labek
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 0.923

5.  A Scandinavian experience of register collaboration: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA).

Authors:  Leif I Havelin; Otto Robertsson; Anne M Fenstad; Søren Overgaard; Göran Garellick; Ove Furnes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Establishing an international shoulder arthroplasty consortium.

Authors:  Richard S Page; Ronald A Navarro; Bjorn Salomonsson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Arthroplasty registers: a review of international experiences.

Authors:  Victoria Serra-Sutton; Alejandro Allepuz; Mireia Espallargues; Gerold Labek; Joan M V Pons
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Registry of shoulder arthroplasty - the Scottish experience.

Authors:  S Sharma; C R Dreghorn
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  The Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry: clinical outcome and short-term survival of 2,137 primary shoulder replacements.

Authors:  Jeppe V Rasmussen; John Jakobsen; Stig Brorson; Bo S Olsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Patient-reported outcome and risk of revision after shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis. 1,209 cases from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry, 2006-2010.

Authors:  Jeppe V Rasmussen; Anne Polk; Stig Brorson; Anne Kathrine Sørensen; Bo S Olsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Revision Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Davies; Hussain Selmi; Sanjeeve Sabharwal; Martinique Vella-Baldacchino; Alex D Liddle; Peter Reilly
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-04-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.