Literature DB >> 31447944

What is the correlation between patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores and patient satisfaction following elective reverse total shoulder replacement?

Rachael L C Daw1, Jo Gibson1, Denise Prescot2, Laura Bonnett3, Matthew Smith4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) have typically been assessed using the same instruments as anatomical shoulder arthroplasties. However, to date, there has been a lack of investigation with respect to the correlation of such scores and patient satisfaction in the RTSA population.
METHODS: The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QD) score were prospectively collected in 38 RTSA patients (41 shoulders) postoperatively. Scores were then evaluated to establish whether or not they correlated with patient satisfaction at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively.
RESULTS: The correlation coefficient for the OSS and patient satisfaction was found to be 0.313 (p = 0.011) and the correlation coefficient for the QD score and patient satisfaction was -0.292 (p = 0.017), showing a statistically significant but moderately weak relationship between the OSS and QD scores with patient satisfaction (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed no strongly significant relationship between patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores and patient satisfaction following elective RTSA. These findings emphasise the need to question the appropriateness of standard PROM scores for the assessment of outcome and success following elective RTSA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROM scores; Patient-reported outcome measures; patient satisfaction; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Year:  2017        PMID: 31447944      PMCID: PMC6688154          DOI: 10.1177/1758573217744178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  21 in total

1.  The range of the Oxford Shoulder Score in the asymptomatic population: a marker for post-operative improvement.

Authors:  F Younis; J Sultan; S Dix; P J Hughes
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Grammont's idea: The story of Paul Grammont's functional surgery concept and the development of the reverse principle.

Authors:  Emmanuel Baulot; François Sirveaux; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan J Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Frederic Balg
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches.

Authors:  Dorcas E Beaton; James G Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The Oxford shoulder score revisited.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Katherine Rogers; Ray Fitzpatrick; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Evolution of the reverse total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Reza Jazayeri; Young W Kwon
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2011

7.  The use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction ratings to assess outcome in hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder.

Authors:  J L Rees; J Dawson; G C R Hand; C Cooper; A Judge; A J Price; D J Beard; A J Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-08

8.  The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity.

Authors:  Brian G Leggin; Lori A Michener; Michael A Shaffer; Susan K Brenneman; Joseph P Iannotti; Gerald R Williams
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew L Chen; Elizabeth B Bain; Marilee P Horan; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 10.  Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Erik K Mayer; Ara W Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.