| Literature DB >> 31447888 |
Yi-Shao Li1, Kai-Ming Shih1, Chung-Te Chang2, Jeng-Der Chung3, Shih-Ying Hwang1.
Abstract
Populations can be genetically isolated by differences in their ecology or environment that hampered efficient migration, or they may be isolated solely by geographic distance. Moreover, mountain ranges across a species' distribution area might have acted as barriers to gene flow. Genetic variation was quantified using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and 13 selective amplification primer combinations used generated a total of 482 fragments. Here, we tested the barrier effects of mountains on gene flow and environmentally dependent local adaptation of Cunninghamia konishii occur in Taiwan. A pattern of genetic isolation by distance was not found and variation partitioning revealed that environment explained a relatively larger proportion of genetic variation than geography. The effect of mountains as barriers to genetic exchange, despite low population differentiation indicating a high rate of gene flow, was found within the distribution range of C. konishii. Twelve AFLP loci were identified as potential selective outliers using genome-scan methods (BAYESCAN and DFDIST) and strongly associated with environmental variables using regression approaches (LFMM, Samβada, and rstanarm) demonstrating adaptive divergence underlying local adaptation. Annual mean temperature, annual precipitation, and slope could be the most important environmental factors causally associated with adaptive genetic variation in C. konishii. The study revealed the existence of physical barriers to current gene flow and environmentally dependent adaptive divergence, and a significant proportion of the rate of gene flow may represent a reflection of demographic history.Entities:
Keywords: AFLP; Cunninghamia konishii; barriers to gene flow; conservation; mountain ranges
Year: 2019 PMID: 31447888 PMCID: PMC6697026 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Figure 1Geographic distribution of the 11 populations of C. konishii occur in Taiwan. See for abbreviations of the 11 populations of C. konishii.
Site properties and population genetic parameters based on 482 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) loci of the sampled C. konishii populations.
| Locality | Latitude/Longitude | Altitude (m) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alishan (AL) | 120.7644/23.5303 | 2,132 | 19 | 0.0261 | 73.7 | 0.260 (0.008) | 0.923 (0.001) | 0.003 (0.001) |
| Anmashan (AM) | 121.0044/24.2647 | 2,510 | 6 | 0.0110 | 41.1 | 0.239 (0.008) | −0.076 (0.519) | −0.0004 (0.519) |
| Chitou (CT) | 120.7864/23.6675 | 1,236 | 3 | 0.0225 | 33.0 | 0.284 (0.008) | 0.491 (0.241) | 0.003 (0.241) |
| Denta (DT) | 121.1408/23.7489 | 2,299 | 22 | 0.0119 | 67.4 | 0.227 (0.008) | 2.010 (0.001) | 0.006 (0.001) |
| Dayuanshan (DY) | 121.6436/24.5544 | 1,065 | 3 | 0.0296 | 32.2 | 0.262 (0.009) | 5.123 (0.003) | 0.033 (0.003) |
| Kuanwu (KW) | 121.1375/24.4956 | 2,060 | 19 | 0.0149 | 74.3 | 0.253 (0.008) | 3.213 (0.001) | 0.009 (0.001) |
| Shengkuang (SK) | 121.3381/24.3772 | 2,176 | 9 | 0.0141 | 60.8 | 0.265 (0.009) | 4.798 (0.001) | 0.017 (0.001) |
| Shiouhluan (SL) | 121.2642/24.6458 | 1,296 | 10 | 0.0188 | 58.9 | 0.251 (0.009) | 0.046 (0.409) | 0.0002 (0.409) |
| Tajian (TJ) | 121.1989/24.2542 | 1,511 | 10 | 0.0125 | 58.1 | 0.243 (0.009) | 1.811 (0.001) | 0.007 (0.001) |
| Tashueshan (TS) | 120.9569/24.2358 | 1,810 | 8 | 0.0157 | 49.4 | 0.239 (0.009) | 2.493 (0.001) | 0.011 (0.001) |
| Yeinhai (YH) | 121.4969/24.1336 | 1,844 | 6 | 0.0098 | 43.6 | 0.245 (0.009) | 0.664 (0.075) | 0.003 (0.075) |
| Total | 115 | |||||||
| Average (SD) | 0.0170 (0.007) | 53.9 | 0.252 (0.016) |
N, number of samples; uHE, unbiased expected heterozygosity. IA, index of association; rD, modified index of association. PBr, private band richness. %P, the percentage of polymorphic loci.
Summary of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA).
| Source of variation | df | Sum of squares | Variance component | % variation | Fixation index |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between populations | 10 | 1,001.39 | 4.73 | 8.27 | ΦST = 0.0827 | <0.001 |
| Within populations | 104 | 5,457.78 | 52.48 | 91.73 | ||
| Total | 114 | 6,459.17 | 57.21 | 100 |
Figure 2Individual assignments of 115 individuals from 11 populations of C. konishii analyzed using LEA. The clustering scenarios for K = 2–3 were displayed.
Figure 3Clustering results analyzed using discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC).
Figure 4Barriers to genetic exchange identified using Monmnier’s algorithm. The levels of physical barrier effect of gene flow were represented by the thickness of blue lines. See for abbreviations of the 11 populations of C. konishii.
The percentage of variation explained in genetic loci accounted for by non-geographically structured environmental variables [a], shared (geographically structured) environmental variables [b], pure geographic factors [c], and undetermined component [d] analyzed based on the eight retained environmental variables.
| Variation (adjusted | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Environment [a] | 0.05183 | 1.7834 | 0.001 |
| Environment + Geography [b] | 0.00356 | – | – |
| Geography [c] | 0.01840 | 2.0527 | 0.001 |
| [a + b + c] | 0.07379 | 1.9082 | 0.001 |
| Residuals [d] | 0.92621 | – | – |
Proportions of explained variation were obtained from variation partitioning by redundant analysis. F and P values are specified for testable fractions. Fraction [b] is untestable because the adjusted R2 value was obtained by subtraction ([a + b + c] − [a] − [c]) rather than by estimation.
Potential outliers associated with environmental variables.
| Markers | BAYESCAN | DFDIST | Samβada, LFMM, and rstanarm | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aspect | BIO1 | BIO7 | BIO12 | NDVI | PET | RainD | Slope | |||
| P1_1409 | 0.0041 | b | ||||||||
| P1_1715 | 0.6723 | *,** | B | *,** | a,* | |||||
| P4_1326 | 0.0075 | * | *,** | |||||||
| P5_1061 | 0.0001 | *,** | * | *,** | ||||||
| P5_2456 | 1.1684 | b,*,** | a | a | * | a,*,** | ||||
| P7_2874 | 0.0067 | |||||||||
| P9_1014 | 1.4171 | *,** | a,*,** | * | ||||||
| P9_1688 | 0.0095 | |||||||||
| P11_1715 | 0.6865 | *,** | B | *,** | a,* | |||||
| P12_2853 | 0.0098 | B | ||||||||
| P12_3406 | 0.0080 | |||||||||
| P13_1547 | 0.0017 | B | * | |||||||
| P15_1446 | 1.5961 | a | a,B | a | a | |||||
| P15_1918 | 0.8566 | * | *,** | |||||||
| P18_1421 | 0.0089 | *,** | ||||||||
Fifteen potential outliers were identified by FST genome scan methods (BAYESCAN and DFDIST) and 12 of them were found to be strongly associated with environmental variables using regression approach (Samβada, LFMM, and rstanarm).
a and b represent significant correlation of AFLP markers with individual environmental variables identified, respectively, by Samβada and LFMM. B represents a |Z| ≥ 1.5 in LFMM analysis.
*,** significance based on 95% and 99% posterior credible intervals for the potential outliers found to have strongly correlated with environmental variables using the stan_glm function of R package rstanarm.
Aspect (0–360°) and slope (0–90°).
BIO1, annual mean temperature; BIO7, annual temperature range; BIO12, annual precipitation; RainD, number of rainfall days per year. NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index; PET,The annual total potential evapotranspiration.
Figure 5Heatmap of allele frequencies of the 15 outlier loci identified by either BAYESCAN or DFDIST. The sequence of populations was arranged according to (A) latitude or (B) longitude.