Literature DB >> 11975703

Comparison of genetic diversity estimates within and among populations of maritime pine using chloroplast simple-sequence repeat and amplified fragment length polymorphism data.

M M Ribeiro1, S Mariette, G G Vendramin, A E Szmidt, C Plomion, A Kremer.   

Abstract

We compared the genetic variation of Pinus pinaster populations using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and chloroplast simple-sequence repeat (cpSSR) loci. Populations' levels of diversity within groups were found to be similar with AFLPs, but not with cpSSRs. The high interlocus variance associated with the AFLP loci could account for the lack of differences in the former. Although AFLPs revealed much lower genetic diversity than cpSSRs, the levels of among-population differentiation found with the two types of marker were similar, provided that loci showing fewer than four null-homozygotes, in any population, were pruned from the AFLP data. Moreover, the French and Portuguese populations were clearly differentiated from each other, with both markers. The Mantel test showed that the genetic distance matrix calculated using the AFLP data was correlated with the matrix derived from the cpSSRs. Because of the concordance found between markers we conclude that gene flow was indeed the predominant force shaping nuclear and chloroplastic genetic variation of the populations within regions, at the geographical scale studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11975703     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01490.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  8 in total

1.  Nuclear markers reveal unexpected genetic variation and a Congolese-Nilotic origin of the Lake Victoria cichlid species flock.

Authors:  Ole Seehausen; Egbert Koetsier; Maria Victoria Schneider; Lauren J Chapman; Colin A Chapman; Mairi E Knight; George F Turner; Jacques J M van Alphen; Roger Bills
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Variation of selfing rate and inbreeding depression among individuals and across generations within an admixed Cedrus population.

Authors:  M Ferriol; C Pichot; F Lefèvre
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Comparative Bioinformatics Analysis of the Chloroplast Genomes of a Wild Diploid Gossypium and Two Cultivated Allotetraploid Species.

Authors:  Farshid Talat; Kunbo Wang
Journal:  Iran J Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Testing the Effect of Mountain Ranges as a Physical Barrier to Current Gene Flow and Environmentally Dependent Adaptive Divergence in Cunninghamia konishii (Cupressaceae).

Authors:  Yi-Shao Li; Kai-Ming Shih; Chung-Te Chang; Jeng-Der Chung; Shih-Ying Hwang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Genetic structure of coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens [D. Don] Endl.) populations in and outside of the natural distribution range based on nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Natalie Breidenbach; Oliver Gailing; Konstantin V Krutovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of latitudinal gradient and impact of logging on genetic diversity of Cedrela lilloi along the Argentine Yungas Rainforest.

Authors:  Maria V Inza; Noga Zelener; Luis Fornes; Leonardo A Gallo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Annotated genetic linkage maps of Pinus pinaster Ait. from a Central Spain population using microsatellite and gene based markers.

Authors:  Marina de Miguel; Nuria de Maria; M Angeles Guevara; Luis Diaz; Enrique Sáez-Laguna; David Sánchez-Gómez; Emilie Chancerel; Ismael Aranda; Carmen Collada; Christophe Plomion; José-Antonio Cabezas; María-Teresa Cervera
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Transcriptome-wide analysis supports environmental adaptations of two Pinus pinaster populations from contrasting habitats.

Authors:  Rafael A Cañas; Isabel Feito; José Francisco Fuente-Maqueda; Concepción Ávila; Juan Majada; Francisco M Cánovas
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.