Literature DB >> 31447601

Dichotomous Perception of Animal Categories in Infancy.

Hannah White1, Rachel Jubran2, Alyson Chroust3, Alison Heck4, Ramesh S Bhatt5.   

Abstract

Although there is a wealth of knowledge on categorization early in life, there are still many unanswered questions about the nature of category representation in infancy. For example, it is unclear whether infants are sensitive to boundaries between complex categories, such as types of animals, or whether young infants exhibit such sensitivity without explicit experience in the lab. Using a morphing technique, we linearly altered the category composition of images and measured 6.5-month-olds' attention to pairs of animal faces that either did or did not cross the categorical boundary, with the stimuli in each pair being equally dissimilar from one another across the two types of image pairs. Results indicated that infants dichotomize the continua between cats and dogs and between cows and otters, but only when the images are presented in their canonical, upright orientations. These findings demonstrate a propensity to dichotomize early in life that could have implications for social categorizations, such as race and gender.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal knowledge in infancy; categorical perception; dichotomization in infancy; early conceptual development

Year:  2018        PMID: 31447601      PMCID: PMC6707735          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2018.1553811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  26 in total

1.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants.

Authors:  C C Goren; M Sarty; P Y Wu
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  How shall a thing be called.

Authors:  R BROWN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1958-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

4.  Categorization, categorical perception, and asymmetry in infants' representation of face race.

Authors:  Gizelle Anzures; Paul C Quinn; Olivier Pascalis; Alan M Slater; Kang Lee
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-07

5.  Beyond the distributional input? A developmental investigation of asymmetry in infants' categorization of cats and dogs.

Authors:  Stephanie D Furrer; Barbara A Younger
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2005-11

6.  Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: a preference for female.

Authors:  Paul C Quinn; Joshua Yahr; Abbie Kuhn; Alan M Slater; Olivier Pascalils
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  The development of expert face processing: are infants sensitive to normal differences in second-order relational information?

Authors:  Angela Hayden; Ramesh S Bhatt; Andrea Reed; Christine R Corbly; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2007-03-06

8.  The categories of hue in infancy.

Authors:  M H Bornstein; W Kessen; S Weiskopf
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces.

Authors:  Pamela M Walker; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise.

Authors:  Joshua New; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.