| Literature DB >> 31447508 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that identification of aberrant palmar creases may give clues for an early and noninvasive method of diagnosis of certain disease conditions. Toward this purpose, awareness of the normal variants of palmar creases must be first recognized. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the patterns of palmar creases in healthy Ethiopian population among Medical and Dental Students in Addis Ababa. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Right and left palm pictures from 318 (177 females and 141 males) participants were taken using a mobile camera, and evaluated qualitatively. Observations were analyzed by Fisher's exact test, and significance levels for comparisons were set at p<0.05.Entities:
Keywords: Palmar crease; Simian crease; Suwon crease; Sydney crease
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31447508 PMCID: PMC6689715 DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v29i3.12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ethiop J Health Sci ISSN: 1029-1857
Figure 1Types of Palm Creases based on the relationship between proximal and distal transverse creases. a& b: Non-variant creases with 2 points of origin (a) and 3 points of origin (b). c: Simian crease, PTC and DTC have fused and spans the entire width of the palm; d: Sydney crease, PTC crosses the entire width of the palm to near the ulnar border; e: Suwon crease, an extended DTC that spans the entire width of the palm. DTC: distal longitudinal crease; PTC: proximal longitudinal crease; RLC: radial longitudinal crease
Incidence of the different types of palmar crease according to sex, side, and laterality
| Type of Crease | Total | Bilateral | Unilateral | ||||
| Right | Left | ||||||
| F & M | F | M | F | M | F | M | |
| 548 (86.2) | 139 (78.5) | 113 (80.1) | 12 (6.8) | 8 (5.7) | 13 (7.3) | 11 (7.8) | |
| 40 (6.3) | 6 (3.4) | 5 (3.5) | 4 (2.3) | 4 (2.8) | 7 (3.9) | 3 (2.1) | |
| 22 (3.5) | 3 (1.7) | 1 (0.7) | 6 (3.4) | 4 (2.8) | 2 (1.1) | 2 (1.4) | |
| 26 (4.1) | 4 (2.3) | 1 (0.7) | 3 (1.7) | 5 (3.5) | 3 (1.7) | 5 (3.5) | |
| 88 (13.8) | 13 (7.3) | 7 (5.0) | 13 (7.3) | 13 (9.2) | 12 (6.8) | 10 (7.1) | |
| 636 (100.0) | 152 (85.8) | 120 (85.1) | 25 (14.1) | 21 (14.9) | 25 (14.1) | 21 (14.9) | |
Values under brackets are percentiles. F: Female; M: Male
Incidence of points of origin of palm crease according to sex, side and laterality
| Points of | Total | Bilateral | Unilateral | ||||
| Right | Left | ||||||
| F & M | F | M | F | M | F | M | |
| 18 (2.8) | 3 (1.7) | 3 (2.1) | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (1.7) | 2 (1.4) | |
| 492 (77.4) | 108 | 111 | 10 | 9 (6.4) | 26 | 9 | |
| 126 (19.8) | 29 | 9 | 26 | 9 | 8 | 7 (5.0) | |
| 636 (100.0) | 140 (79.1) | 123 (87.2) | 37 (20.9) | 18 (12.8) | 37 (20.9) | 18 (12.8) | |
Values under brackets are percentiles. F: Female; M: Male;
indicates significant between females and males at P < 0.05;
indicates significant between right and left sides at P < 0.05
Incidence of points of origin of palm crease according to sex, side, and crease type
| Sides | Points | Non-variant | Simian | Sydney | Suwon | ||||
| F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | ||
| 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (2.3) | 3 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| 101 | 105 | 6 (3.4) | 6 (4.3) | 5 (2.8) | 4 (2.8) | 6 (3.4) | 5 (3.5) | ||
| 50 | 16 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (2.3) | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.7) | ||
| 151 (85.3) | 121 (85.8) | 10 (5.6) | 9 (6.4) | 9 (5.1) | 5 (3.5) | 7 (3.9) | 6 (4.2) | ||
| 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (3.4) | 5 (3.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0.) | ||
| 118 (66.7) | 108 (76.6) | 7 (3.9) | 3 (2.1) | 2 (1.1) | 3 (2.1) | 7 (3.9) | 6 (4.2) | ||
| 34 (19.2) | 16 (11.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (1.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| 152 (85.9) | 124 (87.9) | 13 (7.3) | 8 (5.7) | 5 (2.8) | 3 (2.1) | 7 (3.9) | 6 (4.2) | ||
Values under brackets are percentiles. F: Female; M: Male;
indicates significant between females and males at P<0.05
Figure 2Variants of Palm Creases: Arrow in “a” shows accessory crease of the RLC. In “b” big and small arrows show, respectively broken DTC and forked PTC, while arrow heads show branches of RLC; c: cascade of DTC (arrows); d: middle finger crease (arrows) and branched RLC (arrow head); DTC: distal longitudinal crease; PTC: proximal longitudinal crease; RLC: radial longitudinal crease
Incidence of the variants of the major palm creases according to sex, side, and laterality
| Major | Variants | Total | Bilateral | Unilateral | ||||
| Right & Left | Right | Left | ||||||
| F & M | F | M | F | M | F | M | ||
| Branched | 52 (8.2) | 9 (5.1) | 5 (3.5) | 7 (3.9) | 4 (2.8) | 6 (3.4) | 7 (5.0) | |
| 46 (7.2) | 3 (1.7) | 8 (5.7) | 4 (2.3) | 6 (4.3) | 7 (3.9) | 7 (5.0) | ||
| 96 (15.1) | 11 (6.2) | 10 (7.1) | 22 | 13 (9.2) | 10 | 9 (6.4) | ||
| 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| 25 (3.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (4.5) | 5 (3.5) | 8 (4.5) | 4 (2.8) | ||
| 417 (65.6) | 94 (53.1) | 72 (51.1) | 19 (10.7) | 18 (12.8) | 29 (16.4) | 19 (13.5) | ||
| 636 (100.0) | 117 (66.1) | 95 (67.4) | 60 (33.9) | 46 (32.6) | 60 (33.9) | 46 (32.6) | ||
| 58 (9.1) | 9 (5.1) | 6 (4.3) | 8 (4.5) | 4 (2.8) | 9 (5.1) | 8 (5.7) | ||
| 22 (3.5) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | 2 (1.1) | 3 (2.1) | 4 (2.3) | 11 (7.8) | ||
| 4 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.7) | 2 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| 7 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.4) | 2 (1.1) | 1 (0.7) | ||
| 6 (0.9) | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| 539 (84.7) | 137 (77.4) | 104 (73.8) | 18 (10.2) | 19 (13.5) | 11 (6.2) | 9 (6.4) | ||
| 636 (100.0) | 147 (83.0) | 112 (79.4) | 30 (16.9) | 29 (20.6) | 30 (16.9) | 29 (20.6) | ||
| 19 (3.0) | 3 (1.7) | 1 (0.7) | 2 (1.1) | 2 (1.4) | 3 (1.7) | 4 (2.8) | ||
| 21 (3,3) | 2 (1.1) | 1 (0.7) | 3 (1.7) | 4 (2.8) | 5 (2.8) | 3 (2.1) | ||
| 3 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | ||
| 6 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.6) | 4 (2.8) | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| 30 (4.7) | 6 (3.4) | 2 (1.4) | 1 (0.6) | 3 (2.1) | 4 (2.3) | 6 (4.3) | ||
| 557 (87,6) | 148 (83.6) | 114 (80.9) | 2 (6.2) | 9 (6.4) | 5 (2.8) | 8 (5.7) | ||
| 636 (100.0) | 159 (89.8) | 119 (84.4) | 18 (10.2) | 22 (15.6) | 18 (10.2) | 22 (15.6) | ||
Values under brackets are percentiles. F: Female; M: Male;
indicates significant between right and left sides at P<0.05