Literature DB >> 31447077

Abiraterone in "High-" and "Low-risk" Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Alex P Hoyle1, Adnan Ali2, Nicholas D James3, Adrian Cook4, Christopher C Parker5, Johann S de Bono5, Gerhardt Attard6, Simon Chowdhury7, William R Cross8, David P Dearnaley9, Christopher D Brawley4, Clare Gilson4, Fiona Ingleby5, Silke Gillessen10, Daniel M Aebersold11, Rob J Jones12, David Matheson13, Robin Millman14, Malcolm D Mason15, Alastair W S Ritchie5, Martin Russell12, Hassan Douis3, Mahesh K B Parmar4, Matthew R Sydes4, Noel W Clarke16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate received licencing for use in only "high-risk" metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC) following the LATITUDE trial findings. However, a "risk"-related effect was not seen in the STAMPEDE trial. There remains uncertainty as to whether men with LATITUDE "low-risk" M1 disease benefit from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with abiraterone acetate and prednisolone (AAP).
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of heterogeneity of effect between LATITUDE high- and low-risk M1 prostate cancer patients receiving ADT + AAP in the STAMPEDE trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the 2017 STAMPEDE "abiraterone comparison". Staging scans for M1 patients contemporaneously randomised to ADT or ADT + AAP within the STAMPEDE trial were evaluated centrally and blind to treatment assignment. Stratification was by risk according to the criteria set out in the LATITUDE trial. Exploratory subgroup stratification incorporated the CHAARTED criteria. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome measure was failure-free survival (FFS). Further exploratory analysis evaluated clinical skeletal-related events, progression-free survival (PFS), and prostate cancer-specific death. Standard Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were employed for analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 901 M1 STAMPEDE patients were evaluated after exclusions. Of the patients, 428 (48%) were identified as having a low risk and 473 (52%) a high risk. Patients receiving ADT + AAP had significantly improved OS (low-risk hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66, 95% confidence interval or CI [0.44-0.98]) and FFS (low-risk HR: 0.24, 95% CI [0.17-0.33]) compared with ADT alone. Heterogeneity of effect was not seen between low- and high-risk groups for OS or FFS. For OS benefit in low risk, the number needed to treat was four times greater than that for high risk. However, this was not observed for the other measured endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: Men with mHNPC gain treatment benefit from ADT + AAP irrespective of risk stratification for "risk" or "volume". PATIENT
SUMMARY: Coadministration of abiraterone acetate and prednisolone with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is associated with prolonged overall survival and disease control, compared with ADT alone, in all men with metastatic disease starting hormone therapy for the first time.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abiraterone; Adjuvant treatment; Advanced; Androgen deprivation therapy; Hormone-naïve prostate cancer; Hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; Metastatic; Prostate cancer; STAMPEDE trial; Systemic therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31447077     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  29 in total

1.  Clinical recommendations in the management of advanced prostate cancer: International Gastrointestinal, Liver and Uro-oncology (IGILUC 2019) experts.

Authors:  Hesham Elghazaly; Nicolas Mottet; Jorge Garcia; Stephane Oudard; Mack Roach; Claude Abbou; Axel Merseburger; Amr Emara; Samir Shehata; Hesham Tawfik; Ola Khorshid; Ahmed Selim; Akram Assem; Khalid Abdelkarim; Lobna Ezz El-Arab; Shouki Bazarbashi; Abbass Omar; Hesham Elwakil; Mohamed Elashry; Mohamed Abou ElFotouh; Tarek Osman; Mai Ezz El Din
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Systemic treatment of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  Alexander Kretschmer; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Canadian Urological Association-Canadian Urologic Oncology Group guideline on metastatic castration-naive and castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan I So; Kim N Chi; Brita Danielson; Neil E Fleshner; Anil Kapoor; Tamim Niazi; Frederic Pouliot; Ricardo A Rendon; Bobby Shayegan; Srikala Sridhar; Eric Vigneault; Fred Saad
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Nascent Prostate Cancer Heterogeneity Drives Evolution and Resistance to Intense Hormonal Therapy.

Authors:  Scott Wilkinson; Huihui Ye; Fatima Karzai; Stephanie A Harmon; Nicholas T Terrigino; David J VanderWeele; John R Bright; Rayann Atway; Shana Y Trostel; Nicole V Carrabba; Nichelle C Whitlock; Stephanie M Walker; Rosina T Lis; Houssein Abdul Sater; Brian J Capaldo; Ravi A Madan; James L Gulley; Guinevere Chun; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Daniela C Salles; Harsimar B Kaur; Tamara L Lotan; David J Venzon; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; William L Dahut; Adam G Sowalsky
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Three-month Prostate-specific Antigen Level After Androgen Deprivation Therapy Predicts Survival in Patients With Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Naohiro Fujimoto; Masaki Shiota; Takuo Matsukawa; Akinori Minato; Ikko Tomisaki; Rei Ohnishi; Masatoshi Eto
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Comparison of Treatments for Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Channing Paller; Hwanhee Hong; Lori Rosman; Anthony De Felice; Otis Brawley; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard J Rebello; Christoph Oing; Karen E Knudsen; Stacy Loeb; David C Johnson; Robert E Reiter; Silke Gillessen; Theodorus Van der Kwast; Robert G Bristow
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 8.  2020 Korean guidelines for the management of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  In-Ho Kim; Sang Joon Shin; Byung Woog Kang; Jihoon Kang; Dalyong Kim; Miso Kim; Jin Young Kim; Chan Kyu Kim; Hee-Jun Kim; Chi Hoon Maeng; Kwonoh Park; Inkeun Park; Woo Kyun Bae; Byeong Seok Sohn; Min-Young Lee; Jae Lyun Lee; Junglim Lee; Seung Taek Lim; Joo Han Lim; Hyun Chang; Joo Young Jung; Yoon Ji Choi; Young Seok Kim; Jaeho Cho; Jae Young Joung; Se Hoon Park; Hyo Jin Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  Population-Based Study of Docetaxel or Abiraterone Effectiveness and Predictive Markers of Progression Free Survival in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Juan Briones; Maira Khan; Amanjot K Sidhu; Liying Zhang; Martin Smoragiewicz; Urban Emmenegger
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  The treatment landscape of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yasutaka Yamada; Himisha Beltran
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 8.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.