Joanna Rudnicka1, Tomasz Kowalkowski1, Bogusław Buszewski2. 1. Department of Environmental Chemistry and Bioanalytics, Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 7 Gagarin St, 87-100, Toruń, Poland; Centre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 4 Wileńska St, 87-100 Toruń, Poland. 2. Department of Environmental Chemistry and Bioanalytics, Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 7 Gagarin St, 87-100, Toruń, Poland; Centre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 4 Wileńska St, 87-100 Toruń, Poland. Electronic address: bbusz@chem.umk.pl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the potential of combined multivariate chemometric methods for seeking markers of lung cancer. METHODS: Statistical methods such as Mann-Whitney U test, discriminant function analysis (DFA), factor analysis (FA) and artificial neural network (ANN) were applied to evaluate the obtained data from GC/MS analysis of exhaled breath. RESULTS: The total number of compounds identified by GC/MS in human breath was equal to 88. The statistical analysis indicates seven analytes which have the highest discriminatory power. Cross validation of the obtained model shows that the sensitivity was 80% and the specificity was 91.23%, while for the test group the sensitivity and specificity were both 86.36%. CONCLUSION: The application of combined statistical methods allowed to reduce the number of compounds to significant ones and indicates them as markers of lung cancer.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the potential of combined multivariate chemometric methods for seeking markers of lung cancer. METHODS: Statistical methods such as Mann-Whitney U test, discriminant function analysis (DFA), factor analysis (FA) and artificial neural network (ANN) were applied to evaluate the obtained data from GC/MS analysis of exhaled breath. RESULTS: The total number of compounds identified by GC/MS in human breath was equal to 88. The statistical analysis indicates seven analytes which have the highest discriminatory power. Cross validation of the obtained model shows that the sensitivity was 80% and the specificity was 91.23%, while for the test group the sensitivity and specificity were both 86.36%. CONCLUSION: The application of combined statistical methods allowed to reduce the number of compounds to significant ones and indicates them as markers of lung cancer.