Literature DB >> 31445278

Eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud as a novel approach for a usability evaluation.

Hwayoung Cho1, Dakota Powell2, Adrienne Pichon2, Lisa M Kuhns3, Robert Garofalo3, Rebecca Schnall2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report on the use of an eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud for usability evaluation and to describe its application in assessing the usability of a mobile health app.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used an eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud to evaluate the usability of an HIV prevention mobile app among 20 young men (15-18 years) in New York City, NY; Birmingham, AL; and Chicago, IL. Task performance metrics, critical errors, a task completion rate per participant, and a task completion rate per task, were measured. Eye-tracking metrics including fixation, saccades, time to first fixation, time spent, and revisits were measured and compared among participants with/without a critical error.
RESULTS: Using task performance analysis, we identified 19 critical errors on four activities, and of those, two activities had a task completion rate of less than 78%. To better understand these usability issues, we thoroughly analyzed participants' corresponding eye movements and verbal comments using an in-depth problem analysis. In areas of interest created for the activity with critical usability problems, there were significant differences in time spent (p = 0.008), revisits (p = 0.004), and total numbers of fixations (p = 0.007) by participants with/without a critical error. The overall mean score of perceived usability rated by the Health IT Usability Evaluation Scale was 4.64 (SD = 0.33), reflecting strong usability of the app. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: An eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud enabled us to identify critical usability problems as well as gain an in-depth understanding of the usability issues related to interactions between end-users and the app. Findings from this study highlight the utility of an eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud in consumer health usability evaluation research.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye movement measurements; Eye movements; Eye-tracking; Health IT; Information technology; Mobile applications; Mobile health; Usability evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31445278      PMCID: PMC6717560          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  15 in total

1.  Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing.

Authors:  Laura Faulkner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-08

2.  A comparison of usability evaluation methods: heuristic evaluation versus end-user think-aloud protocol - an example from a web-based communication tool for nurse scheduling.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

3.  Adaptation of a Group-Based HIV RISK Reduction Intervention to a Mobile App for Young Sexual Minority Men.

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall; Lisa M Kuhns; Marco A Hidalgo; Dakota Powell; Jennie Thai; Sabina Hirshfield; Cynthia Pearson; Matt Ignacio; Josh Bruce; D Scott Batey; Asa Radix; Uri Belkind; Robert Garofalo
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2018-12

4.  Development of MyPEEPS Mobile: A Behavioral Health Intervention for Young Men.

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall; Lisa Kuhns; Marco Hidalgo; Sabina Hirshfield; Cynthia Pearson; Asa Radix; Uri Belkind; Joshua Bruce; D Scott Batey; Robert Garofalo
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2018

5.  Development of a Customizable Health IT Usability Evaluation Scale.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Dean Wantland; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

6.  Before your very eyes: the value and limitations of eye tracking in medical education.

Authors:  Ellen M Kok; Halszka Jarodzka
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Ten factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks for health information technology.

Authors:  Alissa L Russ; Jason J Saleem
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology.

Authors:  William Brown; Po-Yin Yen; Marlene Rojas; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  A Mobile Health Intervention for HIV Prevention Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse Young Men: Usability Evaluation.

Authors:  Hwayoung Cho; Dakota Powell; Adrienne Pichon; Jennie Thai; Josh Bruce; Lisa M Kuhns; Robert Garofalo; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 10.  Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Yushi Yang
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2015-04-14
View more
  7 in total

1.  Establishing a usability cut-point for the health information technology usability evaluation scale (Health-ITUES).

Authors:  Kah Poh Loh; Jianfang Liu; Sarah Ganzhorn; Gabriella Sanabria; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 2.  A Review of Usability Evaluation Methods and Their Use for Testing eHealth HIV Interventions.

Authors:  Rindcy Davis; Jessica Gardner; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  Using a Web-Based App to Deliver Rehabilitation Strategies to Persons With Chronic Conditions: Development and Usability Study.

Authors:  Julie Richardson; Lori Letts; Susanne Sinclair; David Chan; Jordan Miller; Catherine Donnelly; Jenna Smith-Turchyn; Sarah Wojkowski; Janelle Gravesande; Adalberto Loyola Sánchez
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 4.  A Review of Recent HIV Prevention Interventions and Future Considerations for Nursing Science.

Authors:  Megan Threats; Bridgette M Brawner; Tiffany M Montgomery; Jasmine Abrams; Loretta Sweet Jemmott; Pierre-Cedric Crouch; Kellie Freeborn; Emiko Kamitani; Comfort Enah
Journal:  J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care       Date:  2021 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 1.809

Review 5.  Human Factors and Organizational Issues.

Authors:  Yalini Senathirajah; Sylvia Pelayo
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2020-08-21

6.  Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale: Psychometric Evaluation.

Authors:  Jisan Lee; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-01-24

7.  Mobile Access to Medical Records in Heart Transplantation Aftercare: Mixed-Methods Study Assessing Usability, Feasibility and Effects of a Mobile Application.

Authors:  Julia Müller; Lina Weinert; Laura Svensson; Rasmus Rivinius; Michael M Kreusser; Oliver Heinze
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.