Literature DB >> 3144441

Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and enflurane as supplements to general anaesthesia for outpatient gynaecologic surgery.

S Haley1, G Edelist, G Urbach.   

Abstract

We compared two narcotic/N2O anaesthetic techniques and an inhalational anaesthesia/N2O technique for outpatient surgery in 59 women undergoing short gynaecological procedures. All patients received droperidol 0.625 mg IV, thiopentone and 70 per cent N2O in O2 plus either alfentanil (15 micrograms.kg-1), fentanyl (1.5 microgram.kg-1) or enflurane. The narcotics were given in a double-blind fashion and all anaesthetic techniques were assigned randomly. Cardiorespiratory parameters remained stable in all groups, with few clinically important changes occurring. Recovery was significantly faster in the group receiving alfentanil, with the time to respond to verbal commands and the time to establish alertness significantly faster than with either fentanyl or enflurane. All techniques provided satisfactory anaesthesia; however, the patients receiving alfentanil had significantly more adverse events than those receiving fentanyl.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3144441     DOI: 10.1007/BF03020342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  14 in total

1.  Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics.

Authors:  T A RYAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  The prophylactic antiemetic effect of droperidol.

Authors:  C M Patton; M R Moon; F J Dannemiller
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1974 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Alfentanyl (R39209): initial clinical experience with a new narcotic analgesic.

Authors:  B Kay; D K Stephenson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Alfentanyl as a supplement to neuroradio-anaesthesia. Comparison with fentanyl.

Authors:  A M Bidabé; P Floras; A M Gin; J F Dartiques; M Sabathié; J M Caillé
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.447

5.  Recovery after fentanyl and alfentanil in anaesthesia for minor surgery.

Authors:  B Kay; P Venkataraman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Alfentanil-supplemented anaesthesia for short procedures. A double-blind comparison with fentanyl.

Authors:  M Patrick; B M Eagar; D F Toft; P S Sebel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Antiemetic effect of droperidol after ophthalmic surgery.

Authors:  K Iwamoto; H Schwartz
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-08

8.  Anaesthesia for laparoscopy: alfentanil and fentanyl compared.

Authors:  B Kay; A T Cohen; F Shaw; T E Healy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Alfentanil and recovery.

Authors:  M E Sinclair; G M Cooper
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Alfentanil, a new, potent and very short-acting morphinomimetic for minor operative procedures. A pilot study.

Authors:  L van Leeuwen; L Deen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.041

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal aortic surgery: anesthetic implications.

Authors:  A J Cunningham
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.