Literature DB >> 31444162

Subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors: phase 2 trial results.

Amy D Shapiro1, Pantep Angchaisuksiri2, Jan Astermark3, Gary Benson4, Giancarlo Castaman5, Pratima Chowdary6, Hermann Eichler7, Victor Jiménez-Yuste8, Kaan Kavakli9, Tadashi Matsushita10, Lone Hvitfeldt Poulsen11, Allison P Wheeler12, Guy Young13, Silva Zupancic-Salek14,15,16, Johannes Oldenburg17,18.   

Abstract

Results from the main parts (24 weeks) of 2 concizumab phase 2 trials are presented: explorer4 in hemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) with inhibitors (HAwI/HBwI) and explorer5 in HA. The trials aimed to evaluate the efficacy of daily subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis (evaluated as annualized bleeding rate [ABR] at last dose level), with secondary objectives being safety and immunogenicity (assessed as number of adverse events [AEs] and antidrug antibodies [ADAs]). Patients received 0.15 mg/kg concizumab, with potential dose escalation to 0.20 and 0.25 mg/kg (if ≥3 spontaneous bleeding episodes within 12 weeks of concizumab treatment). Relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters were assessed. Thirty-six HA, 9 HAwI, and 8 HBwI patients were exposed to concizumab. Most inhibitor patients (15 of 17; 88.2%) did not escalate the dose; all patients chose to continue to the extension phase of the trials. Clinical proof of concept for prevention of bleeding episodes was demonstrated in both trials. Estimated ABRs in HAwI and HBwI were lower vs HA: 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7; 5.3) and 5.9 (95% CI, 4.2; 8.5) vs 7.0 (95% CI, 4.6; 10.7), respectively. PK/PD results were as expected, with no difference between hemophilia subtypes for concizumab exposure, free tissue factor pathway inhibitor, thrombin generation, prothrombin fragment 1+2, and d-dimers. Concizumab was safe and well tolerated (no severe AEs, AE-related withdrawals, or thromboembolic events). Three patients had (very low to medium titer) ADA+ tests in each trial, with no observed clinical effect. These results support further development of concizumab as a daily prophylactic treatment in all hemophilia patients. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03196284 and #NCT03196297.
© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31444162      PMCID: PMC6895373          DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019001542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  22 in total

Review 1.  Hemostatic properties of a TFPI antibody.

Authors:  Lars C Petersen
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.944

2.  Barriers to compliance with prophylaxis therapy in haemophilia.

Authors:  M R Hacker; S Geraghty; M Manco-Johnson
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.287

3.  A randomized trial of safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of concizumab in people with hemophilia A.

Authors:  H Eichler; P Angchaisuksiri; K Kavakli; P Knoebl; J Windyga; V Jiménez-Yuste; A Hyseni; U Friedrich; P Chowdary
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 4.  Extended Half-Life Factor VIII and Factor IX Preparations.

Authors:  Lukas Graf
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 5.  Optimal treatment strategies for hemophilia: achievements and limitations of current prophylactic regimens.

Authors:  Johannes Oldenburg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Hemophilia and inhibitors: current treatment options and potential new therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Shannon L Meeks; Glaivy Batsuli
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

7.  Bleeding and safety outcomes in persons with haemophilia A without inhibitors: Results from a prospective non-interventional study in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Rebecca Kruse-Jarres; Johannes Oldenburg; Elena Santagostino; Midori Shima; Christine L Kempton; Craig M Kessler; Michaela Lehle; Sammy Chebon; Nives Selak Bienz; Elina Asikanius; Johnny Mahlangu
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 8.  Haemophilias A and B.

Authors:  Paula H B Bolton-Maggs; K John Pasi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Tissue factor pathway inhibitor: structure-function.

Authors:  George J Broze; Thomas J Girard
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2012-01-01

Review 10.  Aspects of prophylactic treatment of hemophilia.

Authors:  Rolf Ljung
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2016-10-04
View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  A Molecular Revolution in the Treatment of Hemophilia.

Authors:  John S S Butterfield; Kerry M Hege; Roland W Herzog; Radoslaw Kaczmarek
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Current progress and future direction in the treatment for hemophilia.

Authors:  Midori Shima
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Factor V east Texas variant causes bleeding in a three-generation family.

Authors:  Julie A Peterson; Sweta Gupta; Nicholas D Martinez; Brandon Hardesty; Susan A Maroney; Alan E Mast
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 4.  Clotting factor concentrates for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in previously treated individuals with haemophilia A or B.

Authors:  Omotola O Olasupo; Megan S Lowe; Ashma Krishan; Peter Collins; Alfonso Iorio; Davide Matino
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-18

Review 5.  Laboratory monitoring of hemophilia A treatments: new challenges.

Authors:  Peter J Lenting
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-12

Review 6.  Novel treatments for hemophilia through rebalancing of the coagulation cascade.

Authors:  Yakun Zhao; Angela C Weyand; Jordan A Shavit
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 7.  Tolerating Factor VIII: Recent Progress.

Authors:  Sebastien Lacroix-Desmazes; Jan Voorberg; David Lillicrap; David W Scott; Kathleen P Pratt
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  MG1113, a specific anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor antibody, rebalances the coagulation system and promotes hemostasis in hemophilia.

Authors:  Heechun Kwak; Sumin Lee; Seunghyun Jo; Young Eun Kwon; Hyunju Kang; Gahee Choi; Myung Eun Jung; Mi-Jeong Kwak; Seonghoon Kim; Byung-Ha Oh; Dong-Sik Kim; Sung Ho Hwang
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-10-22

9.  Intrauterine lethality in Tfpi gene disrupted mice is differentially suppressed during mid- and late-gestation by platelet TFPIα overexpression.

Authors:  Amy E Siebert; Susan A Maroney; Nicholas D Martinez; Alan E Mast
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 16.036

Review 10.  Bispecific Antibodies and Advances in Non-Gene Therapy Options in Hemophilia.

Authors:  Midori Shima
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.