Literature DB >> 32396619

Laboratory monitoring of hemophilia A treatments: new challenges.

Peter J Lenting1.   

Abstract

Monitoring factor VIII (FVIII) activity has traditionally been complicated by discrepancies between assays for the various sorts of FVIII molecules. The advent of novel nonfactor therapies (emicizumab, fitusiran, and anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor antibodies) in hemophilia A poses a new level of difficulty on the laboratory monitoring of these patients. To use the correct assays and for a proper interpretation of their results, it is pertinent to understand the mode of action of these nonfactor agents. Furthermore, the biochemical consequences for the different types of activity assays (whether it be specific FVIII activity assays or global coagulation assays) should be taken into account as well. In this review, these aspects will be discussed. In addition, the use of various animal models to estimate FVIII-equivalence of the nonfactor therapies will be presented.
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32396619      PMCID: PMC7218434          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  61 in total

Review 1.  Factor Activity Assays for Monitoring Extended Half-Life FVIII and Factor IX Replacement Therapies.

Authors:  Steve Kitchen; Stefan Tiefenbacher; Robert Gosselin
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.180

2.  Prediction of individual factor VIII or IX level for the correction of thrombin generation in haemophilic patients.

Authors:  P Chelle; A Montmartin; M Piot; L Ardillon; B Wibaut; B Frotscher; M Cournil; C Morin; B Tardy-Poncet
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 3.  The evolution of recombinant factor replacement for hemophilia.

Authors:  Amanda D Sankar; Angela C Weyand; Steven W Pipe
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 1.764

4.  Value assignment of the WHO 6th International Standard for blood coagulation factor VIII and von Willebrand factor in plasma (07/316).

Authors:  A R Hubbard; M Hamill; M Beeharry; S A Bevan; A B Heath
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.824

5.  A hemophilia A mouse model for the in vivo assessment of emicizumab function.

Authors:  Stephen Ferrière; Ivan Peyron; Olivier D Christophe; Charlotte Kawecki; Caterina Casari; Vincent Muczynski; Amit Nathwani; Alexandre Kauskot; Peter J Lenting; Cécile V Denis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody recognizing coagulation factors IX and X: how does it actually compare to factor VIII?

Authors:  Peter J Lenting; Cécile V Denis; Olivier D Christophe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Gla-domainless factor Xa: molecular bait to bypass a blocked tenase complex.

Authors:  Raphaël Marlu; Benoît Polack
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  Thrombin generation and whole blood viscoelastic assays in the management of hemophilia: current state of art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Guy Young; Benny Sørensen; Yesim Dargaud; Claude Negrier; Kathleen Brummel-Ziedins; Nigel S Key
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Anti-factor IXa/X bispecific antibody (ACE910): hemostatic potency against ongoing bleeds in a hemophilia A model and the possibility of routine supplementation.

Authors:  A Muto; K Yoshihashi; M Takeda; T Kitazawa; T Soeda; T Igawa; Y Sakamoto; K Haraya; Y Kawabe; M Shima; A Yoshioka; K Hattori
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 10.  Anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) therapy: a novel approach to the treatment of haemophilia.

Authors:  Pratima Chowdary
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.490

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Factor-mimetic and rebalancing therapies in hemophilia A and B: the end of factor concentrates?

Authors:  Patrick Ellsworth; Alice Ma
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  Applicability of the Thrombin Generation Test to Evaluate the Hemostatic Status of Hemophilia A Patients in Daily Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ángel Bernardo; Alberto Caro; Daniel Martínez-Carballeira; José Ramón Corte; Sonia Vázquez; Carmen Palomo-Antequera; Alfredo Andreu; Álvaro Fernández-Pardo; Julia Oto; Laura Gutiérrez; Inmaculada Soto; Pilar Medina
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Expert opinion on current and future prophylaxis therapies aimed at improving protection for people with hemophilia A.

Authors:  Angelika Batorova; Ana Boban; Melen Brinza; Toshiko Lissitchkov; Laszlo Nemes; Irena Zupan Preložnik; Petr Smejkal; Nadezhda Zozulya; Jerzy Windyga
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-04

Review 4.  Haemophilia.

Authors:  Erik Berntorp; Kathelijn Fischer; Daniel P Hart; Maria Elisa Mancuso; David Stephensen; Amy D Shapiro; Victor Blanchette
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 52.329

5.  Pharmacokinetics and Associated Efficacy of Emicizumab in Humans: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anouk A M T Donners; Carin M A Rademaker; Lisanne A H Bevers; Alwin D R Huitema; Roger E G Schutgens; Toine C G Egberts; Kathelijn Fischer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 5.577

Review 6.  Non-factor therapies for bleeding disorders: A primer for the general haematologist.

Authors:  Dawn Swan; Johnny Mahlangu; Jecko Thachil
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2022-04-28

7.  Thromboelastography and thrombin generation assessments for pediatric severe hemophilia A patients are highly variable and not predictive of clinical phenotypes.

Authors:  Natalie Mathews; Fred G Pluthero; Margaret L Rand; Ann Marie Stain; Manuel Carcao; Victor S Blanchette; Walter H A Kahr
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-09-26

Review 8.  Phage Display Derived Monoclonal Antibodies: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Mohamed A Alfaleh; Hashem O Alsaab; Ahmad Bakur Mahmoud; Almohanad A Alkayyal; Martina L Jones; Stephen M Mahler; Anwar M Hashem
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 7.561

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.