| Literature DB >> 31443424 |
Ecaterina Andronescu1,2,3, Daniela Predoi4, Ionela Andreea Neacsu1,2, Andrei Viorel Paduraru1, Adina Magdalena Musuc1,5, Roxana Trusca2,3, Ovidiu Oprea1,2, Eugenia Tanasa2,3, Otilia Ruxandra Vasile2,3, Adrian Ionut Nicoara1,2, Adrian Vasile Surdu1,2, Florin Iordache6, Alexandra Catalina Birca1,2, Simona Liliana Iconaru4, Bogdan Stefan Vasile7,8,9.
Abstract
Luminescent europium-doped hydroxylapatite (EuXHAp) nanomaterials were successfully obtained by co-precipitation method at low temperature. The morphological, structural and optical properties were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR), UV-Vis and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of EuXHAp were also evaluated using MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)) assay, oxidative stress assessment and fluorescent microscopy. The results reveal that the Eu3+ has successfully doped the hexagonal lattice of hydroxylapatite. By enhancing the optical features, these EuXHAp materials demonstrated superior efficiency to become fluorescent labelling materials for bioimaging applications.Entities:
Keywords: MTT assay; europium doped hydroxylapatite; fluorescent microscopy; oxidative stress assessment; photoluminescence
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443424 PMCID: PMC6780766 DOI: 10.3390/nano9091187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1X-ray diffraction patterns of hydroxylapatite (HAp) and EuXHAp.
Calculated crystallite size (D) values and degree of crystallinity (Xc) of pure HAp and europium doped hydroxylapatite with various amount of Eu.
| No. | Samples | D/nm | S/% | Xc/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HAp | 9.62 ± 1.46 | 0.95 ± 0.29 | 33.93 |
| 2 | Eu0.5HAp | 14.88 ± 2.96 | 0.74 ± 0.66 | 26.25 |
| 3 | Eu1HAp | 12.82 ± 2.72 | 0.84 ± 0.66 | 24.11 |
| 4 | Eu1.5HAp | 17.3 ± 4.92 | 0.65 ± 0.55 | 22.97 |
| 5 | Eu2HAp | 14.44 ± 3.56 | 0.77 ± 0.63 | 22.63 |
| 6 | Eu10HAp | 10.78 ± 3.04 | 1.04 ± 0.85 | 23.03 |
| 7 | Eu50HAp | 3.55 ± 0.34 | 2.66 ± 1.56 | 21.87 |
Unit cell parameters a, c, V and agreement indices for hydroxylapatite HAp and Eu-doped HAp (with concentration of Eu3+ of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 10 and 50%).
| Sample | a [Å] | c [Å] | V [Å3] |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAp | 9.434979 ± 0.001401 | 6.8803397 ± 0.001042 | 530.6588 | 3.4323 | 3.99694 | 5.19277 | 2.28891 |
| Eu0.5HAp | 9.440372 ± 0.002067 | 6.878142 ± 0.001529 | 530.8601 | 3.96601 | 4.82349 | 6.554 | 2.7309 |
| Eu1HAp | 9.445147 ± 0.002444 | 6.879144 ± 0.001839 | 531.4745 | 3.92894 | 4.95602 | 6.61378 | 2.83367 |
| Eu1.5HAp | 9.439496 ± 0.001874 | 6.879717 ± 0.001413 | 530.883 | 3.7995 | 4.38638 | 5.76083 | 2.29889 |
| Eu2HAp | 9.440372 ± 0.002067 | 6.878142 ± 0.001529 | 530.8601 | 3.96601 | 4.82349 | 6.554 | 2.7309 |
| Eu10HAp | 9.443276 ± 0.002227 | 6.879882 ± 0.001665 | 531.321 | 3.88457 | 4.43662 | 5.82612 | 2.24943 |
| Eu50HAp | 9.544463 ± 0.021918 | 6.315845 ± 0.023992 | 498.2704 | 3.02385 | 3.11688 | 4.08783 | 1.82753 |
Figure 2Unit cell parameters versus substitution degree for HAp and EuXHAp.
Figure 3The estimated crystallite size, lattice microstrain and degree of crystallinity.
Figure 4The SEM images (column A) and EDX spectra (column B) of pure HAp and EuXHAp samples (a) HAp, (b) Eu0.5HAp, (c) Eu1HAp, (d) Eu1.5HAp, (e) Eu2HAp, (f) Eu10HAp, (g) Eu50HAp.
Figure 5The TEM and HRTEM images, SAED patterns and particle size distribution of pure HAp and EuXHAp samples (a–c) HAp, (d–f) Eu0.5HAp, (g–i) Eu1HAp, (j–l) Eu1.5HAp, (m–o) Eu2HAp, (p–r) Eu10HAp, (s–u) Eu50HAp.
Figure 6FTIR spectra of EuXHAp samples.
Figure 7Raman spectra of EuXHAp samples.
Figure 8(A) UV-Vis absorption spectra of EuXHAp at different Eu-concentrations (B) Room-temperature photoluminescence spectra of EuXHAp at different Eu-concentrations.
Figure 9MTT assay showing the viability of AFSC in the presence of the EuXHAp ceramic materials: HAp, Eu05HAp, Eu1HAp, Eu1.5HAp, Eu2HAp, Eu10HAp, Eu50HAp, and control (cell only).
Figure 10GSH assay showing the oxidative stress of AFSC in the presence of the EuXHAp ceramic materials: HAp, Eu05HAp, Eu1HAp, Eu1.5HAp, Eu2HAp, Eu10HAp, Eu50HAp and control (cell only).
Figure 11Fluorescence images of EuXHAp samples coloured with CMTPX fluorophore (a) Control sample, (b) Eu0.5HAp, (c) Eu1HAp, (d) Eu1.5HAp, (e) Eu2HAp, (f) Eu10HAp, (g) Eu50HAp.