| Literature DB >> 31443262 |
Paula Žurga1, Nada Vahčić2, Igor Pasković3, Mara Banović2, Mladenka Malenica Staver4.
Abstract
Food safety is one of the main concerns in the world and in wine it depends mostly on metabolites of microbial origin. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of natural contaminants, ochratoxin A and biogenic amines (cadaverine, histamine, putrescine and tyramine), in Croatian commercial red wines originating from different Croatian wine-making regions. Ochratoxin A was detected in 92.8% of samples, however its concentrations in all samples were more than 10-fold lower than the limit set by the European Union (2 µg/kg), marking these wines as safe for consumption. The frequency of occurrence and measured concentrations of ochratoxin A were higher in wines produced in southern regions with highest values obtained in wines from southern Dalmatian islands. All samples were contaminated with cadaverine and putrescine, while 88.2% and 82.7% were contaminated with histamine and tyramine, respectively. Histamine concentrations ranged from below the limit of detection to 8.5 mg/L. Higher histamine concentrations were measured in wines with higher pH values which coincided with southern geographic origin. These results reinforce the need for routine detection and quantification of biogenic amines in Croatian wines to achieve better control of vinification and minimize their formation.Entities:
Keywords: Croatian red wines; HPLC; biogenic amines; ochratoxin A
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443262 PMCID: PMC6723180 DOI: 10.3390/foods8080348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Classification of wine samples according to variety, geographic origin and vintage.
| Variety | Region | Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) | Vintage (No. of Samples) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Babić | Dalmatia | Northern Dalmatia | 2011(1); 2012(1); 2013(2); 2014(1); 2015(1) |
| Blaufränkisch | Eastern Continental Croatia | Croatian Podunavlje | 2012(1); 2013(1); 2015(1) |
| Blaufränkisch | Eastern Continental Croatia | Slavonia | 2012(3); 2013(1); 2015(2) |
| Cabernet Sauvignon | Eastern Continental Croatia | Croatian Podunavlje | 2013(2); 2014(1); 2015(2) |
| Cabernet Sauvignon | Eastern Continental Croatia | Slavonia | 2014(2); 2015(1) |
| Cabernet Sauvignon | Istria | Croatian Istria | 2011(2); 2012(1); 2013(3); 2014(1); 2015(3) |
| Cabernet Sauvignon | Dalmatia | Northern Dalmatia | 2012(1) |
| Cabernet Sauvignon | Dalmatia | Dalmatian Inland | 2013(1) |
| Merlot | Eastern Continental Croatia | Croatian Podunavlje | 2011(1); 2012(1); 2013(1); 2014(1); 2015(2) |
| Merlot | Eastern Continental Croatia | Slavonia | 2012(1); 2015(2) |
| Merlot | Istria | Croatian Istria | 2012(1); 2013(5); 2014(1); 2015(2) |
| Merlot | Dalmatia | Northern Dalmatia | 2013(1) |
| Merlot | Dalmatia | Dalmatian Inland | 2013(2); 2014(1); 2015(2) |
| Merlot | Dalmatia | Central and Southern Dalmatia | 2011(1); 2014(1); 2015(1) |
| Pinot noir | Eastern Continental Croatia | Croatian Podunavlje | 2012(2); 2015(2) |
| Pinot noir | Eastern Continental Croatia | Slavonia | 2012(1); 2013(1) |
| Plavac mali | Dalmatia | Central and Southern Dalmatia | 2013(7); 2014(9); 2015(11) |
| Plavac mali | Dalmatia | Dingač | 2013(3); 2015(2) |
| Teran | Istria | Croatian Istria | 2011(1); 2012(2); 2013(2); 2014(1); 2015(4) |
The results of methods’ validation experiments.
| Limit of Detection | Spiked | Recovery (%) | Within-Day Precision * RSD (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTA (µg/L) | 0.02 | 88.2 | 9.8 | |
| 0.006 | 0.05 | 91.1 | 8.2 | |
| 0.1 | 93.6 | 6.9 | ||
| Putrescine (mg/L) | 1 | 90.1 | 8.8 | |
| 0.1 | 5 | 92.8 | 6.9 | |
| 10 | 93.3 | 6.8 | ||
| Histamine (mg/L) | 1 | 92.1 | 7.5 | |
| 0.2 | 5 | 92.8 | 7.2 | |
| 10 | 96.5 | 5.9 | ||
| Tyramine (mg/L) | 1 | 92.6 | 8.7 | |
| 0.2 | 5 | 95.2 | 8.3 | |
| 10 | 101.1 | 5.8 | ||
| Cadaverine (mg/L) | 1 | 89.6 | 9.2 | |
| 0.2 | 5 | 92.2 | 7.5 | |
| 10 | 94.9 | 6.9 |
OTA—Ochratoxin A; RSD—relative standard deviation. * Within-day precision was tested by analyzing spiked wines six times within the same day.
Concentrations of ochratoxin A (µg/L) according to geographic origin.
| Region (No of Samples) | Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) | Average | Median | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All regions (110) | 0.040 | 0.026 | 0.003–0.163 | |
| Dalmatia (49) | Dalmatian Inland | 0.020 | 0.018 | 0.007–0.036 |
| Dingač | 0.095 | 0.088 | 0.062–0.124 | |
| Northern Dalmatia | 0.065 | 0.057 | 0.025–0.106 | |
| Central and Southern Dalmatia | 0.061 | 0.051 | 0.009–0.163 | |
| Istria (29) | Croatian Istria | 0.020 | 0.016 | 0.003–0.068 |
| Eastern Continental Croatia (32) | Croatian Podunavlje | 0.028 | 0.020 | 0.003–0.079 |
| Slavonia | 0.023 | 0.017 | 0.003–0.060 |
Prevalence of measured concentrations of OTA according to geographic region.
| Region (No. of Samples) | Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) | Number of Wines in the Concentration Range | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <0.02 µg/L * | 0.02–0.05 µg/L | 0.05–0.1 µg/L | >0.1 µg/L | ||
| All regions (110) | 45 (41%) | 32 (29%) | 23 (21%) | 10 (9%) | |
| Dalmatia (49) | Dalmatian Inland | 3 (50%) | 3 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Dingač | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (60%) | 2 (40%) | |
| Northern Dalmatia | 0 (0%) | 2 (33%) | 3 (50%) | 1 (17%) | |
| Central and Southern Dalmatia | 7 (22%) | 8 (25%) | 10 (31%) | 7 (22%) | |
| Istria (29) | Croatian Istria | 18 (62%) | 9 (31%) | 2 (7%) | 0 (0%) |
| Eastern Continental Croatia (32) | Croatian Podunavlje | 9 (50%) | 6 (33%) | 3 (16%) | 0 (0%) |
| Slavonia | 8 (57%) | 4 (29%) | 2 (14%) | 0 (%) | |
* This category also includes wines with ochratoxin A concentrations below limit of detection (LOD).
Ochratoxin A incidence of wine contamination and concentrations measured in wine from previous studies.
| Country | No. of Samples | Vintages | Contaminated Samples (%) | LOD (µg/L) | Range (µg/L) | Mean (µg/L) | Median (µg/L) | Analytical Procedure | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slovakia | 39 | 2005 | 31 | 0.011 | <LOD–0.463 | - | - | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Moravia | 46 | 2003–2009 | 11 | 0.0003 | <LOD–0.071 | - | - | IAC UPLC FLD | [ |
| Hungary | 65 | 2000–2002 | 97.7 | 0.01 | 0.01–0.533 | 0.110 | - | Immunoassay | [ |
| Croatia | 14 | 2002–2003 | 79 | 0.010 | <LOD–0.047 | 0.022 | 0.022 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Croatia | 10 | 2007 | 80 | 0.005 | <LOD–0.021 | 0.015 | 0.015 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Croatia | - | 2004–2008 | 100 | 0.00032 | 0.00036–0.061 | 0.0188 | 0.00765 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| France | 49 | 2002–2005 | 96 | 0.01 | <LOD–1.218 | - | - | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| France | - | 2006–2009 | 91.7 | 0.00032 | <LOD–0.088 | 0.0336 | 0.00356 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Portugal | 60 | - | 20 | 1 (LOQ) | <LOQ–2.4 | - | - | Direct injection HPLC FLD | [ |
| Spain | 100 | 1995–2008 | 57 | 0.002 | <LOD–0.179 | 0.035 | - | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Spain | 188 | 2002–2005 | 99 | 0.01 | <LOD–4.63 | 0.65 | 0.19 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Spain | - | 2006–2009 | 100 | 0.00032 | 0.00105–0.104 | 0.0372 | 0.0251 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Greece | 150 | 1999–2006 | 69.4 | 0.01 | <LOD–2.00 | 0.26 | 0.10 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Greece | - | 2003–2007 | 100 | 0.00032 | 0.00435–0.212 | 0.0594 | 0.0317 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Greece | 60 | 2007–2009 | 86.7 | 0.01 | <LOD–2.52 | 0.38 | 0.10 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Italy | 1166 | 1988–2004 | 64.32 | 0.01 | <LOD–7.5 | 0.28 | 0.07 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Italy | 1206 | 2000–2007 | 68 | 0.0072 | <LOD–2.63 | 0.116 | - | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Italy | - | 2005–2008 | 100 | 0.00032 | 0.00518–0.286 | 0.0539 | 0.020 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Turkey | 95 | - | 86 | 0.006 | <LOD–0.815 | - | - | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
| Turkey | 47 | 1999–2001 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.02–2.23 | 0.419 | - | SPE clean up HPLC FLD | [ |
| Turkey | 25 | 1987–2005 | 100 | 0.052 | 0.25–7.96 | 2.55 | - | Direct injection HPLC FLD | [ |
| Turkey | - | 2003–2007 | 100 | 0.00032 | 0.00291–0.101 | 0.0311 | 0.0205 | IAC HPLC FLD | [ |
LOD—limit of detection; LOQ—limit of quantitation; IAC—immunoaffinity column clean up; SPE—solid phase extraction; FLD—fluorescence detection.
Figure 1Incidence of contaminated samples according to geographic origin (contaminated-blue; non-contaminated-red).
Concentrations of biogenic amines (mg/L) according to grape variety.
| Babić ( | Blaufränk. ( | Cabernet Sauvignon ( | Merlot ( | Pinot Noir ( | Plavac Mali ( | Teran ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putrescine | Average | 6.5 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 6.0 | 4.7 |
| Min.–max. | 3.5–9.1 | 3.3–9.6 | 3.4–14.1 | 1.0–13.4 | 2.0–5.8 | 1.5–14.0 | 1.8–9.2 | |
| Contaminated samples (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Histamine | Average | 3.8 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Min.–max. | 0.9–7.1 | 0.4–4.6 | 0.1–8.5 | 0.2–3.8 | 0.1–3.3 | 0.1–7.1 | 0.1–4.4 | |
| Contaminated samples (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 74.1 | 100 | 87.5 | 80 | |
| Tyramine | Average | 1.5 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
| Min.–max. | 0.1–3.5 | 0.1–8.4 | 0.1–5.9 | 0.1–3.5 | 0.1–0.9 | 0.1–8.0 | 0.1–3.6 | |
| Contaminated samples (%) | 83.3 | 88.9 | 90 | 81.5 | 83.3 | 78.1 | 80 | |
| Cadaverine | Average | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| Min.–max. | 0.2–1.3 | 0.2–2.0 | 0.3–2.2 | 0.1–2.7 | 0.2–1.0 | 0.3–3.0 | 0.3–3.0 | |
| Contaminated samples (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Correlations between vintage, basic parameters and concentrations of biogenic amines in investigated wines.
| Vintage | Ethanol | SO2 | pH | MA | LA | PUT | CAD | HIS | TYR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vintage | 1.000 | |||||||||
| Ethanol | −0.052 | 1.000 | ||||||||
| SO2 | 0.029 | −0.212 | 1.000 | |||||||
| pH | 0.080 | 0.126 | −0.101 | 1.000 | ||||||
| MA | −0.045 | 0.024 | 0.201 |
| 1.000 | |||||
| LA | 0.053 |
| −0.148 |
|
| 1.000 | ||||
| PUT | −0.002 | −0.055 | −0.062 | −0.151 | 0.075 | −0.017 | 1.000 | |||
| CAD | 0.247 | 0.038 | 0.102 | 0.037 | 0.100 | 0.000 | −0.038 | 1.000 | ||
| HIS | 0.082 | −0.189 | −0.105 |
|
| 0.156 |
| 0.059 | 1.000 | |
| TYR | −0.004 | −0.121 | −0.022 |
| −0.140 |
|
| −0.004 |
| 1.000 |
MA—malic acid; LA—lactic acid; PUT—putrescine; CAD—cadaverine; HIS—histamine; TYR—tyramine. The statistically significant correlation coefficients are marked in bold (p < 0.05).