Literature DB >> 31442604

Higher Esophageal Symptom Burden in Obese Subjects Results From Increased Esophageal Acid Exposure and Not From Dysmotility.

Benjamin D Rogers1, Amit Patel2, Dan Wang3, Gregory S Sayuk1, C Prakash Gyawali4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophageal motor disorders (EMD) and pathologic reflux are often identified in obese individuals, but it is not clear how obesity contributes to these symptoms. We examined the relationships among symptom burden, EMD, acid exposure time (AET), symptom association probability, and body mass index (BMI).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 1089 consecutive patients who underwent high-resolution manometry, of which 426 patients also underwent reflux monitoring off acid suppression, over a 2-year period at a tertiary referral center. Symptom burden was assessed by questionnaires to determine dominant symptom intensity (DSI; product of symptom severity, and frequency, on 5-point Likert scales) and global symptom severity (GSS; global esophageal symptoms on 10-cm visual analog scales) at the time of esophageal testing; BMIs were recorded. We compared proportions of patients with EMD and abnormal reflux burden among BMI categories and correlated them with symptom burden.
RESULTS: Four-hundred thirty-three patients (39.8%) met the criteria for EMD. Esophageal outflow obstruction was observed in higher proportions of patients with low BMIs (underweight, 25.9%; normal, 14.1%; overweight, 13.9%; and obese, 9.8%; P = .037), but EMDs were less frequent in obese patients (P = .047), despite higher symptom burden compared with non-obese patients (DSI, 10.5 ± 0.3 vs 9.7 ± 0.2; P = .03 and GSS, 6.5 ± 1 vs 5.9 ± 1; P = .01). Among the 426 patients who underwent reflux monitoring, the proportions with total AET (P = .02), and upright AET (P < .001) increased among BMI categories, supine AET trended strongly (P = .06), in combination with increasing DSI and GSS (P ≤ .001 for each comparison). BMI correlated with symptom burden, higher AET, and positive symptom association probability (P < .01 for each analysis).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased symptom burden in obese individuals correlates with esophageal acid burden but not with motor disorders.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory Reflux Monitoring; GERD; High-Resolution Manometry; Symptom Association Probability

Year:  2019        PMID: 31442604      PMCID: PMC7031033          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  33 in total

Review 1.  High resolution manometry: the Ray Clouse legacy.

Authors:  C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Parameters on esophageal pH-impedance monitoring that predict outcomes of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Amelioration of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for clinically significant obesity.

Authors:  Lana G Nelson; Rodrigo Gonzalez; Krista Haines; Scott F Gallagher; Michel M Murr
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Obese patients have stronger peristalsis and increased acid exposure in the esophagus.

Authors:  Fernando Fornari; Sidia M Callegari-Jacques; Roberto Oliveira Dantas; Ana Lúcia Scarsi; Liana Ortiz Ruas; Sérgio Gabriel Silva de Barros
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Fabien Stenard; Antonio Iannelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in the obese: what is the best surgical approach?

Authors:  Maurice-Pierre Pagé; Andrew Kastenmeier; Matthew Goldblatt; Matthew Frelich; Matthew Bosler; James Wallace; Jon Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  The effect of bariatric surgery on gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Mustafa El-Hadi; Daniel W Birch; Richdeep S Gill; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Peter J Kahrilas; Edoardo Savarino; Frank Zerbib; Francois Mion; André J P M Smout; Michael Vaezi; Daniel Sifrim; Mark R Fox; Marcelo F Vela; Radu Tutuian; Jan Tack; Albert J Bredenoord; John Pandolfino; Sabine Roman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group.

Authors:  S Roman; C P Gyawali; E Savarino; R Yadlapati; F Zerbib; J Wu; M Vela; R Tutuian; R Tatum; D Sifrim; J Keller; M Fox; J E Pandolfino; A J Bredenoord
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.598

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Characteristics of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Heartburn.

Authors:  Satsuki Takahashi; Tomoaki Matsumura; Tatsuya Kaneko; Mamoru Tokunaga; Hirotaka Oura; Tsubasa Ishikawa; Ariki Nagashima; Wataru Shiratori; Naoki Akizue; Yuki Ohta; Atsuko Kikuchi; Mai Fujie; Keiko Saito; Kenichiro Okimoto; Daisuke Maruoka; Tomoo Nakagawa; Makoto Arai; Jun Kato; Naoya Kato
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.