Literature DB >> 31440484

The relationship between kidney stones and dietary habits.

Akeel T Al-Kazwini1, Maan S Al-Arif2, Suhad S Abu-Mweis3, Tarek F Al-Hammouri4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Kidney stones are considered a serious disease, due to the great discomfort that they can cause and may even lead to renal failure. Dietary habits could be the reason behind stone formation in kidneys.
METHODS: Twelve kidney stone samples were collected and analyzed together with typical foodstuffs frequently consumed in the Koya area using the x-ray fluorescent technique.
RESULTS: All the analyzed stones were found to be calcium-based. The results show that elements such as Ca, Zr, S and Cl can be regarded as the core elements for the formation of kidney stones in Koya city in north Iraq.
CONCLUSION: Many dietary foods and drink frequently consumed by the people in Koya city were observed to contain the core elements. However, more studies are needed to demonstrate if dietary intake may be the main source for kidney stone formation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  XRF; core elements; dietary; kidney stone

Year:  2019        PMID: 31440484      PMCID: PMC6664423          DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S211483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Rep Urol        ISSN: 2253-2447


Background

Kidney stone disease is a common disease that affects a large number of people and it has been classified as one of the illnesses that can cause much pain to human beings. In addition, kidney stone disease can be one of the major causes of chronic kidney disease and chronic kidney failure.1 Worldwide, kidney stone incidence increases from east to west. In Asian countries, from 1% to 5% of the societies, from 5% to 10% in Europe and 13% of the societies in North America are affected by kidney stone formation.2 These differences are related to the socioeconomic conditions of these countries, age, sex, occupation, social class, climate, dietary habits and other geographic factors.2,3 In general, kidney stones affect up to 10%–12% of men and 5%–6% of women.4 There are four main types of renal stones, calcium-based stones, struvite, uric acid and cysteine as a ligand for calcium element.5 The most common stone type is the calcium base which is usually combined with oxalate, phosphate or carbonate to form stones,6 about 70%–80% of stones are composed of calcium oxalate. Some element concentrations may increase or decrease the formation of kidney stones. It is well known that magnesium (Mg) reduces the development of kidney stone disease (acts as an inhibitor) while elements such as calcium (Ca), zirconium (Zr), phosphorous (P), chlorine (Cl), iron (Fe), silicon (Si) and zinc (Zn) may increase kidney stone formation.7,8 Kidney stones begin as minute crystals inside the kidney from substances such as calcium and oxalate that have been filtered from the blood by the kidney into the urine. The salts bind together, creating a central core over which additional layers of material can begin to grow.9 The therapy of the stone disease is usually based on the analysis of urinary calculi, permitting proper management of the disease and prevention of its recurrence.10,11 Singh et al12,13 identified many elements including calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), strontium (Sr), sodium (Na), potassium (K), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S) and chlorine (Cl) in Indian kidney stone patients. Oztoprak et al14 found P, S, Si, Zn and titanium (Ti) as common elements in the stones of patients from Turkey. In Iran, Ca and P were the main elements in kidney stones and Zr and Sr were the most dominant trace metals.15 In Jordan, analysis of stone samples from 110 patients revealed that Ca was the main constituent of stones (48% concentration) and other metals such as Na (1.56%), K (0.9%), Mg (3.08%), Fe (1.17%), Al (0.49%), Zn (0.7%), Cu (0.19%), Mn (0.029%), P (10.35%), S (1.88%), Sr (0.306%), Mo (0.2%), Cr (0.146%), Co (0.05%) and Ni (0.014%) also presented in the tested kidney stones.16 While a study in Czech Republic shows that phosphate was the most important metal-bearing mineral in the examined kidney stones and other metals including Fe, Zr, Mo, Cu, Cd, Se, Sn and Hg was also found.17 It seems that element composition of kidney stones differs by region. This study was performed in Koya city-North Iraq, where the exact reasons and number of kidney stone disease cases are not clear due to the absence of a regular national registry data. The aim of this study is to investigate the core elements in kidney stones and to explore its relationship with local dietary habits in order to further our understanding of the reasons for developing this disease. Regarding ethical issues, the Ministry of Health administration department committee represented by Dr. Kameran Abbs Jubrael stated that the School of medicine at Koya University had no objection for publishing their patients’ renal stone data.

Methods

In this case study, twelve kidney stones were collected from Koya town hospital after kidney stone operations and analyzed. Stones were crushed separately to a very fine powder and made as pellets by compression using a manual press machine (TP HERZOG) with a 200 KN maximum load. The relative mass concentration percentage of elements contained in local dietary foodstuff and drinking water in Koya city was determined by analyses of samples of vegetables, meat, eggs, bottled water and tap water. The food samples were first dried, crushed to a very fine powder and made as pellets by compression in the same manner as the collected stones. Analytical balance KERN ABT (120-4 M) was used to measure the mass of the powder samples before compression. Pellets were then dried by Lab TEch Universal Drying Oven LDO-060E at a temperature of about 45°C to constant weight to ensure removal of free water. Twenty drinking water samples were analyzed from Koya City. Ten of them were collected from the most commonly consumed bottled drinking water. The other ten samples were collected from various sources of tap water. A water sample of 8 mL was poured into the sample cell supplied with a base of 4-µm Prolene film. The sample cell was placed into an oven at 45°C for 3 days for the water to evaporate and to allow minerals to precipitate as a uniform thin layer over the Prolene thin film. All samples were analyzed using Energy Dispersive X-Ray Florescence Rigaku NEX CG machine available at the physics department in Koya University. The statistical parameters minimum, maximum, mean, SD and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were determined after the data distribution passed the normality test (P<0.05) and only for the data containing five or more values. Otherwise, the statistical parameters were labeled as not applicable (NA). The %CV value greater than 100% represents a high variable distribution around the mean, ie, SD exceeds the mean.

Results

The analyzed result for each element was reported as a percentage of the relative mass concentration. The concentration of elements in the twelve different kidney stone samples and their statistical parameters are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The results show that Ca is the main element in all analyzed stones with a mean ± SD value of 91.03±14.04% and percent coefficient of variation 15%. Other elements appear with lower concentration except for sample 10 where Mg appears with concentration of 46% very close to that for Ca concentration. The X-ray fluorescence results indicate that calcium-based stones are the major type of kidney stone. The minor element Zr is found in all samples with concentration ranging from 0.268% to 0.729%, a mean value of 0.50±0.13% and %CV equals to 27%; phosphorous (P) is found in three samples with concentration ranging from 0.11% to 0.857%, Cl is found in all samples with concentration ranging from 0.001% to 0.156%, a mean value of 0.05±0.04% and %CV equals to 92%; Fe is found in seven samples with concentration ranging from 0.006% to 5.5%, a mean value of 1.03±2.01% and %CV equals to 195%; Si is found in all samples except samples no. 2 and 9 with concentration ranging from 0.008% to 2.28%, a mean value of 0.31±0.70% and %CV equals to 225% and Zn is found in all samples except in sample no.6 with concentration between 0.003% and 1.41%, a mean value of 0.19±0.42% and %CV equals to 220%. Since Ca, Zr, S and Cl are found in all samples of stone analyzed, these elements can be regarded as core elements for the formation of kidney stones in Koya city.
Table 1

Percent relative mass concentration for the elements in kidney stones

% ElementStone1Stone2Stone3Stone4Stone5Stone6Stone7Stone8Stone9Stone10Stone11Stone12
Ca96.692.48999.398.898.496.598.274.752.398.797.5
P0.8570.110.832
Zr0.5840.5170.6140.3220.4240.5980.3740.4460.7290.2680.520.58
Eu0.5691.250.0870.1523.530.0070.445
K0.4380.0720.1150.1340.1130.3940.050.1330.0630.1030.214
Sc0.238
Tb0.1561.130.0190.0110.2010.0910.184
Mg0.1120.0520.078460.1380.081
S0.1110.1660.1690.0370.1890.0640.0840.3770.2030.3670.160.156
Al0.0830.0120.030.0730.0540.1160.0680.0780.5480.2090.066
Cl0.0710.06720.01960.00510.0980.04010.04320.1560.04430.0010.0090.029
Si0.05450.00870.01350.09010.05192.280.08130.4230.06170.0556
Cr0.03980.00170.00120.00970.00310.0053
Zn0.03450.3350.2710.00560.00320.01150.01491.410.0040.00590.0067
Tm0.01960.00870.0082
Er0.01640.6080.6410.00680.02120.0089
Sn0.0110.0060.0140.0030.0140.0020.0030.0160.0040.0090.006
Ac0.01152.081.62.20.0069
Hg0.00420.351
Fr0.00360.1590.1080.0020.00080.01680.3630.01430.003
Pt0.00340.6020.0024
Pa0.00250.00290.00930.0086
Au0.00110.210.00090.5350.00280.0031
As0.00050.1450.07360.381
Fe0.6690.9230.06655.50.00620.02410.0135
Dy0.5280.8270.08390.02872.860.0207
Co0.4440.485
Ta0.3420.3320.00880.00590.01910.00180.00640.0094
Sr0.3050.2750.00190.0150.0060.0050.01270.5610.01080.01250.0143
Re0.2920.2310.00670.00790.0030.00950.5470.00660.0083
Cu0.2630.2750.90.0013
Pb0.2230.1070.00240.00850.00730.004
Br0.1290.06670.1740.00050.00360.0005
Sm1.090.08640.1583.480.011
Hf0.359
Ar0.07130.03870.04540.594
Po0.00130.00280.0003
Sc0.212
Rn0.00610.006
Pd0.0004
I0.013
Table 2

Statistical parameters for the elements in kidney stones

% Element% MeanSD% CV
Ca91.0314.0415
PNANANA
Zr0.500.1327
Eu0.861.25145
K0.170.1379
ScNANANA
Tb0.260.39153
Mg7.7418.74242
S0.170.1161
Al0.120.15124
Cl0.050.0492
Si0.310.70225
Cr0.010.01147
Zn0.190.42220
TmNANANA
Er0.220.32146
Sn0.010.0163
Ac1.181.0993
HgNANANA
Fr0.070.12164
PtNANANA
PaNANANA
Au0.130.22173
AsNANANA
Fe1.032.01195
Dy0.721.10151
CoNANANA
Ta0.090.15168
Sr0.110.19169
Re0.120.19157
CuNANANA
Pb0.060.09154
Br0.060.07120
Sm0.971.47153
HfNANANA
ArNANANA
PoNANANA
ScNANANA
RnNANANA
PdNANANA
INANANA

Notes: The mean, SD and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated after the data distribution passed the normality test and only for the data contains five or more values. Otherwise, the statistical parameters are labeled as not applicable (NA).

Percent relative mass concentration for the elements in kidney stones Statistical parameters for the elements in kidney stones Notes: The mean, SD and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated after the data distribution passed the normality test and only for the data contains five or more values. Otherwise, the statistical parameters are labeled as not applicable (NA). A diet rich in minerals increases the risk of kidney stone formation. In order to investigate the causes for the formation of kidney stones, different types of food that are frequently consumed by the people under investigation were analyzed. Various food samples of vegetables, tea, coffee, meats and eggs were analyzed. Tables 3 and 4 show the analysis results of different kinds of vegetables and their statistical parameters, respectively. The core elements Ca, Zr, S and Cl were found in all vegetables analyzed results with concentration ranging between 0.05% and 49% for Ca, a mean value of 8.82±12.21% and %CV equals to 138%; Zr with concentration ranging from 0.21% to 3.13%, a mean value of 0.53±0.70% and %CV equals to 132%; S with concentration ranging from 0.3% to 2.88%, a mean value of 1.11±0.82% and %CV equals to 73% and Cl with concentration ranging from 0.08% to 4.71%, a mean value of 2.04±2.02% and %CV equals to 99%.
Table 3

Percent relative mass concentration for the elements in vegetable samples

%ElementBitter greenpepperCabbageChardCucumberDillEggplantLeekOkraOnionParsleyPotatoesRadishSweet GreenPepperThymeTomatoesZucchini
K92.892.55.9487.957.596.483.213.278.320.398.280.310.871.596.790.3
Ca4.934.184.357.5621.20.917.626.842.6049.00.0512.60.7915.30.802.43
S0.431.551.950.581.470.300.692.880.672.490.201.341.321.260.310.36
Zr0.380.390.140.370.380.380.400.270.350.390.390.400.210.490.383.13
Mg0.310.1619.10.5613.00.270.7449.617.621.60.150.4563.90.960.291.26
Fe0.280.040.120.110.380.040.270.030.270.110.3812.66.250.080.61
Cl0.250.544.711.253.981.235.803.560.335.480.082.860.211.080.820.50
P0.200.290.720.090.180.020.090.620.30
Ar0.130.100.070.150.030.020.140.090.11
Al0.050.061.450.070.880.040.312.780.367.810.580.19
Ti0.040.010.040.010.040.080.05
Si0.041.670.550.800.010.490.880.240.862.321.070.020.27
Zn0.030.030.030.020.010.020.010.010.010.010.010.020.020.29
Cu0.020.010.010.010.010.030.010.010.010.010.010.010.10
Mn0.020.010.030.020.050.010.010.040.020.010.140.010.11
Sr0.010.050.010.040.030.020.0918.50.010.100.070.090.04
Sn0.010.010.06
Co
Ni0.03
Rb0.010.010.010.040.010.15
Pa
V
Br0.040.010.010.010.010.03
Na60.5
Sc0.020.070.030.03
Eu0.020.010.020.580.010.030.04
Dy0.010.010.010.06
Tm
Cr
U
Tb0.37
Yb0.16
Hf0.12
Rn0.06
Fr0.01
Ta0.01
Pb
As
Er
Te
Kr
Au
Table 4

Statistical parameters for the elements in vegetable samples

% Element% MeanSD% CV
K67.2434.3151
Ca8.8212.21138
S1.110.8273
Zr0.530.70132
Mg11.8719.33163
Fe1.443.46241
Cl2.042.0299
P0.280.2487
Ar0.090.0549
Al1.222.23183
Ti0.040.0262
Si0.710.6896
Zn0.040.07197
Cu0.020.02130
Mn0.040.04112
Sr1.475.12349
SnNANANA
CoNANANA
NiNANANA
Rb0.040.06146
PaNANANA
VNANANA
Br0.020.0172
NaNANANA
ScNANANA
Eu0.100.21208
DyNANANA
TmNANANA
CrNANANA
UNANANA
TbNANANA
YbNANANA
HfNANANA
RnNANANA
FrNANANA
TaNANANA
PbNANANA
AsNANANA
ErNANANA
TeNANANA
KrNANANA
AuNANANA

Notes: The mean, SD and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated after the data distribution passed the normality test and only for the data contains five or more values. Otherwise, the statistical parameters are labeled as not applicable (NA).

Percent relative mass concentration for the elements in vegetable samples Statistical parameters for the elements in vegetable samples Notes: The mean, SD and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated after the data distribution passed the normality test and only for the data contains five or more values. Otherwise, the statistical parameters are labeled as not applicable (NA). Table 5 shows the results of black tea, coffee and green tea containing the core elements Ca, Zr, S and Cl with concentration ranging from 0.746% to 14.4%, 0.449% to 5.06%, 0.117% to 0.386% and 0.141% to 0.369%, respectively.
Table 5

Percent relative mass concentration for the elements in tea and coffee samples

% ElementBlack-TeaCoffeeGreen tea
K82.788.691.1
Ca14.40.7466.11
Mn0.6950.1260.768
Zr0.4515.060.449
S0.3860.1170.376
Mg0.3262.340.344
Ar0.2260.0182
Fe0.1900.9260.194
Cl0.1610.3690.141
P0.08710.0834
Al0.07750.04910.137
Ti0.0727
Rb0.04520.6500.0477
Zn0.03460.09390.0389
Gd0.03320.0413
Cu0.02840.04040.0259
Si0.02010.3330.0344
Dy0.01620.06020.0138
Sr0.01220.09370.0182
Ni0.00970.0104
Sn0.00970.1100.0103
Co0.00960.0091
Br0.00300.1500.0032
Eu0.0841
Hf0.0103
Fr0.0086
Sc
Er
U
Percent relative mass concentration for the elements in tea and coffee samples Table 6 shows the core elements, Ca, Zr, S and Cl, which are also found in different kinds of meat samples with concentration ranging from 0.231% to 0.676%, 0.414% to 1.53%, 1.49% to 4.12% and 0.416% to 1.38%, respectively.
Table 6

Percent relative mass concentration for the elements in meat samples

% ElementMeat type
BeefChickenFish
Fr1.96
Cl1.380.9430.416
Zr1.530.4400.414
Fe6.940.2620.0595
P2.061.050.780
K9.0794.896.0
Ca0.2310.6760.612
S4.121.491.50
Zn63.00.05320.0464
Er1.51
Dy0.838
Tb0.149
Sn0.04080.00990.0089
Pt0.490
Rn0.907
Pa2.60
Tm0.533
Hf0.776
Au1.02
Ta0.883
Al0.0824
Si0.0593
Mg0.05830.0998
Cu0.01470.0078
Rb0.01340.0045
Br0.01250.0274
Po0.0008
Se0.0030
Sr0.0028
Percent relative mass concentration for the elements in meat samples Table 7 shows the core elements Ca, Zr, S and Cl, which are found in the egg yolk with concentrations of 1.61%, 0.126%, 0.0%, 0.0% and in egg glair (white part) with concentrations of 0.0%, 0.372%, 2.79%, 2.32%, respectively.
Table 7

Percent relative mass concentration for the elements in egg samples

% ElementsEgg glairEgg yolk
K47.71.14
Mg46.091.1
S2.79
Cl2.32
Al0.528
Zr0.3720.126
Si0.145
Fe0.03860.0608
Br0.00890.0012
Sn0.00710.0017
Rb0.00580.0003
Ti0.0037
Cu0.00350.0026
Zn0.00230.0336
Cr0.0010
Sr0.00040.0003
Se0.00030.0003
P5.92
Ca1.61
Sc0.0125
Dy0.0020
Er0.0019
Ta0.0009
Percent relative mass concentration for the elements in egg samples Tables 8 and 9 show the analysis results of different kinds of bottled water samples and their statistical parameters, respectively. The core elements Ca, Zr, S and Cl were found in all bottled water samples with concentration ranging between 0.0% and 84.3% for Ca, a mean value of 43.49±35.44% and %CV equals to 81%; Zr with concentration ranging from 0.0% to 58.1%, a mean value of 8.13±19.00% and %CV equals to 234%; S with concentration ranging from 0.569% to 39.7%, a mean value of 11.33±13.30% and %CV equals to 117% and Cl with concentration ranging from 0.712% to 30.4%, a mean value of 8.67±9.71% and %CV equals to 112%.
Table 8

Percent relative mass concentration of elements contained in bottled water samples

% ElementsSample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5Sample 6Sample 7Sample 8Sample 9Sample 10
Ca—-3.4684.275.684.310.744.9—-43.21.58
S0.5696.870.6224.466.1410.86.6831.65.8239.7
Cl0.71211.80.7973.150.9199.384.4030.419.75.41
Mg23.68.048.898.377.1527.020.44.2215.331.8
Si2.188.241.401.440.98510.48.815.7811.74.58
Zr58.10.7360.1400.2310.65010.00.01222.380.941
Al0.5680.05150.1230.2020.5012.990.5321.11
K0.3421.330.6640.5850.284
Fe0.01810.08880.00980.01480.04190.4750.2240.0691
Zn0.00050.01380.00120.00080.00200.05880.07540.0031
Sc0.02130.01820.1880.0060
Sr0.0010.00320.00120.00480.00600.0250.00020.01680.0014
Ti0.01280.0130.1030.0310.0074
Br0.00030.00080.00020.00020.0010.00870.0004
Cr0.00410.0050.04840.01340.0040
Tm0.0007
Re0.00040.00410.0010.03810.0130.0019
Fr0.00020.00120.00050.0020.0008
Tb0.00370.00620.07780.0410.0039
Au0.0004
Pa0.0656
Dy0.00250.01110.00660.1100.02870.0020
Mn0.00690.0806
Cu0.00040.00370.00110.02240.0021
Ta0.00440.0020
Na14.859.83.886.8829.228.014.5
Hf0.00060.06730.0342
W0.00060.0034
Rb—–—–
Pt—-
Sn—–
Pb—–
Er0.00130.0087
Ni0.0013
V0.00300.0102
Po—–
Eu0.00460.0365
Yb———–
At0.0050
Ir—–
Bi—–
Table 9

Statistical parameters for elements contained in bottled water samples

% Elements% MeanSD% CV
Ca43.4935.4481
S11.3313.30117
Cl8.679.71112
Mg15.489.6362
Si5.554.0373
Zr8.1319.00234
Al0.760.96127
K0.640.4265
Fe0.120.16136
Zn0.020.03155
ScNANANA
Sr0.010.01129
Ti0.030.04119
Br0.000.00188
Cr0.010.02127
TmNANANA
Re0.010.01150
Fr0.000.0074
Tb0.030.03123
AuNANANA
PaNANANA
Dy0.030.04156
MnNANANA
Cu0.010.01156
TaNANANA
Na22.4419.0685
HfNANANA
WNANANA
RbNANANA
PtNANANA
SnNANANA
PbNANANA
ErNANANA
NiNANANA
VNANANA
PoNANANA
EuNANANA
YbNANANA
AtNANANA
IrNANANA
BiNANANA

Notes: The mean, SD and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated after the data distribution passed the normality test and only for the data contains five or more values. Otherwise, the statistical parameters are labeled as not applicable (NA).

Percent relative mass concentration of elements contained in bottled water samples Statistical parameters for elements contained in bottled water samples Notes: The mean, SD and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated after the data distribution passed the normality test and only for the data contains five or more values. Otherwise, the statistical parameters are labeled as not applicable (NA). Tables 10 and 11 show the analysis results of different kinds of tap water samples and their statistical parameters, respectively. The core elements Ca, Zr, S and Cl were found in all tap water samples with concentration ranging between 0.0% and 82.8% for Ca, a mean value of 44.59±26.12% and %CV equals to 59%; Zr with concentration ranging from 0.187% to 3.26%, a mean value of 1.29±1.18% and %CV equals to 92%; S with concentration ranging from 3.39% to 30.5%, a mean value of 16.11±7.89% and %CV equals to 49% and Cl with concentration ranging from 0.952% to 48.6%, a mean value of 16.91±14.84% and %CV equals to 88%.
Table 10

Percent relative mass concentration of elements contained in tap water samples

% ElementSample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5Sample 6Sample 7Sample 8Sample 9Sample 10
Ca41.534.924.882.881.867.333.317.817.1
S18.330.514.216.13.396.5615.612.022.721.7
Cl15.048.613.428.53.680.9523.377.9119.528.2
Mg14.613.617.419.07.328.9010.620.124.822.8
Si5.576.353.977.561.921.401.759.429.466.43
Zr3.260.2090.4051.280.7040.1870.5142.323.120.868
Al0.8730.6950.3870.3930.1130.1850.2890.7800.9360.501
K0.2841.392.100.0230.3911.441.142.31
Fe0.2160.0140.0370.0810.0190.0140.0370.1430.2110.058
Zn0.1250.0020.0040.0110.0040.0020.0140.1370.009
Sc0.0560.0420.077
Sr0.0350.0040.0120.0180.0040.0120.0650.0230.0220.018
Ti0.0260.0120.0320.0030.0380.0520.019
Br0.01370.00050.00100.00200.00040.00030.00260.00350.00190.0015
Cr0.01060.00220.00640.00110.01130.01310.0056
Tm0.00940.0045
Re0.00640.00070.00170.00220.00070.00210.00240.00460.0015
Fr0.00490.00030.00150.00130.00050.00220.00190.00190.0012
Tb0.00460.00210.00600.0288
Au0.00390.00060.00110.00040.00120.00330.0017
Pa0.00360.0029
Dy0.00280.00900.01730.00360.00520.00380.0170
Mn0.00210.0084
Cu0.00090.00100.00280.00070.00080.00190.00320.00740.0020
Ta0.00070.00270.00180.00140.0050
Na13.812.4
Hf0.0032
W0.0022
Rb0.00050.0005
Pt0.0010
Sn0.0012
Pb0.0002
Er0.00520.01120.0045
Ni0.00160.00200.0005
V0.00140.0087
Po0.0005
Eu0.01270.0237
Yb0.00730.0042
At0.0024
Ir0.0043
Bi0.0031
Table 11

Statistical parameters for elements contained in tap water samples

% Element% MeanSD% CV
Ca44.5926.1259
S16.117.8949
Cl16.9114.8488
Mg15.915.9137
Si5.383.0356
Zr1.291.1892
Al0.520.2956
K1.130.8474
Fe0.080.0895
Zn0.030.06161
ScNANANA
Sr0.020.0284
Ti0.030.0263
Br0.000.00145
Cr0.010.0064
TmNANANA
Re0.000.0075
Fr0.000.0077
TbNANANA
Au0.000.0077
PaNANANA
Dy0.010.0175
MnNANANA
Cu0.000.0092
Ta0.000.0072
NaNANANA
HfNANANA
WNANANA
RbNANANA
PtNANANA
SnNANANA
PbNANANA
ErNANANA
NiNANANA
VNANANA
PoNANANA
EuNANANA
YbNANANA
AtNANANA
IrNANANA
BiNANANA

Notes: The mean, SD and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated after the data distribution passed the normality test and only for the data contains five or more values. Otherwise, the statistical parameters are labeled as not applicable (NA).

Percent relative mass concentration of elements contained in tap water samples Statistical parameters for elements contained in tap water samples Notes: The mean, SD and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated after the data distribution passed the normality test and only for the data contains five or more values. Otherwise, the statistical parameters are labeled as not applicable (NA).

Discussion

The main finding of this study is the identification of the core elements involved in kidney stone formation. Since elements such as Ca, Zr, S and Cl are found in all analyzed stones, those elements are regarded as the core elements in the formation of kidney stones in Koya city. Core elements are also found in dietary material frequently consumed by inhabitants of Koya. The local diet contains high concentrations of the core elements which enhances previous findings regarding the formation of kidney stones.18,19 These findings reflect the correlation between the daily dietary habits and the formation of kidney stones. However, the individual stone formation is dependent on cellular breakdown and metabolism of consumed diet. In this study, calcium is the main element present in high concentrations in all analyzed stones. Calcium oxalate compounds are the most common type of kidney stones. Sorensen11 shows the role of calcium in kidney stone formation. Hypercalciuria is common among calcium kidney stone formation. Abnormalities in calcium hemostasis at absorption or excretion levels can lead to hypercalciuria. For example, increased calcium absorption due to genetic factors and/or increased intake can lead to hypercalciuria. However, dietary calcium restriction is not recommended since calcium plays a major role in human body functions. For instance, calcium and chlorine play a major role in cardiac muscle contraction. In addition, calcium is the essential element in bone structures.18 Ironically, reducing calcium intake leads to a higher incidence of kidney stone formation due to increased oxalate absorption and thus facilitates calcium oxalate complex formation at the renal site.20–23 In this study, the selected statistical parameters emphasize the significance of dietary intake on kidney stone variability in determining the risk of kidney stone formation and makes it possible to predict the relationships. The statistical data shows the interaction of the mean and SD in determining the risk of kidney stone formation. The mean ± SD values of the four core elements Ca, Zr, S and Cl of the analyzed stone are 91.03±14.04%, 0.5±0.13%, 0.17±0.11% and 0.05±0.04%, where the %CV for these analyses were 15%, 27%, 61% and 92%, respectively. The %CV value for Ca was the less than that for Zr, S and Cl, thus the variation around the mean is low. In vegetables, dietary intake has a low mean of Ca (8.82%), large SD (12.21) and hence results with a large %CV (138%), which indicates that the risk of kidney stone formation will be high. In contrast, if both the mean and SD are high but with a low %CV, the risk of kidney stone formation will be relatively low. Comparable kinds of discussion can be made for the risk of kidney stone formation, such as, a high mean (Ca in bottle and tap water 43.49% and 44.59%, respectively), will lead to a high risk of kidney stone formation which is relatively insensitive to the magnitude value of the SD (Ca in bottle and tap water 35.44 and 26.12, respectively). The mean ± SD of the four calcium values in the stones, vegetables, bottled water and tap water are 91.03±14.04%, 8.82±12.21%, 43.49±35.44% and 44.59±26.12% where the %CV for these analyses were 15%, 138%, 81% and 59%, respectively. The result of calcium %CV in the stone is low compared to other dietary products, thus indicating that genetic factors could be influencing the excretion of Ca. However, the mean ± SD values and the %CV of the four core elements found in the stones, vegetables, bottled water and tap water lead to an uneven comparison of risk attributed to dietary factors, and those attributed to genetic factors indicates that the genetic risk exceeds the risk associated with dietary factors.21,22 As a result, eliminating or reducing the intake of these elements will diminish their concentration in the body and alter the human physiology, which eventually can cause various systemic complications and risks. Thus, food, generally, cannot be avoided to prevent the formation of kidney stones. However, different preventive measures have been established in order to reduce the risk of kidney stones, most importantly increasing water intake in order to achieve a urine output of more than 2.5 L/day.24 There was no consensus on whether dietary interventions can reduce the incidence of stone formation or not, including regular dietary calcium intake.20 On the other hand, it is agreed upon that having a balanced diet with moderate amounts of salt and animal protein intake with copious amounts of daily water intake, in addition to maintaining a moderate BMI, are the main factors in reducing the incidence of kidney stone formation and events.25

Conclusion

Many elements including Ca, Zr, S and Cl were identified as core elements in the formation of kidney stones in Koya town. Core elements are also found in dietary material frequently used by people in Koya town. Although consumption of certain diets which contain those elements may elevate the risk of kidney stones, these elements are essential for human body functions. The study of the chemical composition of kidney stones becomes important for understanding their etiology to prevent recurrence; however, genetic factors should always be considered. In order to complement this work, more regional-based studies are needed to investigate the direct relation between dietary intake and environmental exposure to these metals and the risk of kidney stone formation.
  14 in total

1.  Why oral calcium supplements may reduce renal stone disease: report of a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  C P Williams; D F Child; P R Hudson; G K Davies; M G Davies; R John; P S Anandaram; A R De Bolla
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Cross-sectional study of kidney stones by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy.

Authors:  V K Singh; A K Rai; P K Rai; P K Jindal
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Association of minor and trace elements with mineralogical constituents of urinary stones: a hard nut to crack in existing studies of urolithiasis.

Authors:  J Kuta; J Machát; D Benová; R Červenka; J Zeman; P Martinec
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Genetic and dietary factors in urinary citrate excretion.

Authors:  Ojas Shah; Dean G Assimos; Ross P Holmes
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Analysis and classification of heterogeneous kidney stones using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS).

Authors:  Belgin Genc Oztoprak; Jhanis Gonzalez; Jong Yoo; Turgay Gulecen; Nazim Mutlu; Richard E Russo; Ozcan Gundogdu; Arif Demir
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Trace elements in urinary stones: a preliminary investigation in Fars province, Iran.

Authors:  Behnam Keshavarzi; Nasrin Yavarashayeri; Dariush Irani; Farid Moore; Alireza Zarasvandi; Mehrdad Salari
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Concentration effect of trace metals in Jordanian patients of urinary calculi.

Authors:  Iyad Ahmed Abboud
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 4.609

8.  Stone compositions in Turkey: an analysis according to gender and region.

Authors:  Osman Raif Karabacak; Alper Dilli; Hakan Saltaş; Fatih Yalçınkaya; Abdülkerim Yörükoğlu; Memduh Nurettin Sertçelik
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Evaluation of urinary abnormalities in nephrolithiasis patients from Marathwada region.

Authors:  Sharda R Deshmukh; Zia H Khan
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2006-03

10.  Impact of nephrolithiasis on kidney function.

Authors:  Vaka K Sigurjonsdottir; Hrafnhildur L Runolfsdottir; Olafur S Indridason; Runolfur Palsson; Vidar O Edvardsson
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.