Jianwen Wang1,2, Youju Ye1, Meng Xu1, Liguo Feng2, Li-An Xu3. 1. Key Laboratory of Forestry Genetics & Biotechnology of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China. 2. College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, China. 3. Key Laboratory of Forestry Genetics & Biotechnology of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China. laxu@njfu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidences show that SPLs are crucial regulators of plant abiotic stress tolerance and the highly conserved module miR156/SPL appears to balance plant growth and stress responses. The halophyte Tamarix chinensis is highly resistant to salt tress. SPLs of T. chinensis (TcSPLs) and theirs roles in salt stress responses remain elusive. RESULTS: In this study, we conducted a systematic analysis of the TcSPLs gene family including 12 members belonging to 7 groups. The physicochemical properties and conserved motifs showed divergence among groups and similarity in each group. The microRNA response elements (MREs) are conserved in location and sequence, with the exception of first MRE within TcSPL5. The miR156-targeted SPLs are identified by dual-luciferase reporter assay of MRE-miR156 interaction. The digital expression gene profiles cluster suggested potential different functions of miR156-targeted SPLs vs non-targeted SPLs in response to salt stress. The expression patterns analysis of miR156-targeted SPLs with a reverse expression trend to TcmiR156 suggested 1 h (salt stress time) could be a critical time point of post-transcription regulation in salt stress responses. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrated the post-transcription regulation of miR156-targeted TcSPLs and transcription regulation of non-targeted TcSPLs in salt stress responses, and would be helpful to expound the miR156/SPL-mediated molecular mechanisms underlying T. chinensis salt stress tolerance.
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidences show that SPLs are crucial regulators of plant abiotic stress tolerance and the highly conserved module miR156/SPL appears to balance plant growth and stress responses. The halophyte Tamarix chinensis is highly resistant to salt tress. SPLs of T. chinensis (TcSPLs) and theirs roles in salt stress responses remain elusive. RESULTS: In this study, we conducted a systematic analysis of the TcSPLs gene family including 12 members belonging to 7 groups. The physicochemical properties and conserved motifs showed divergence among groups and similarity in each group. The microRNA response elements (MREs) are conserved in location and sequence, with the exception of first MRE within TcSPL5. The miR156-targeted SPLs are identified by dual-luciferase reporter assay of MRE-miR156 interaction. The digital expression gene profiles cluster suggested potential different functions of miR156-targeted SPLs vs non-targeted SPLs in response to salt stress. The expression patterns analysis of miR156-targeted SPLs with a reverse expression trend to TcmiR156 suggested 1 h (salt stress time) could be a critical time point of post-transcription regulation in salt stress responses. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrated the post-transcription regulation of miR156-targeted TcSPLs and transcription regulation of non-targeted TcSPLs in salt stress responses, and would be helpful to expound the miR156/SPL-mediated molecular mechanisms underlying T. chinensissalt stress tolerance.
Entities:
Keywords:
SPL gene family; Salt stress; Tamarix chinensis; miR156
Authors: Matthew W Rhoades; Brenda J Reinhart; Lee P Lim; Christopher B Burge; Bonnie Bartel; David P Bartel Journal: Cell Date: 2002-08-23 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: J L Riechmann; J Heard; G Martin; L Reuber; C Jiang; J Keddie; L Adam; O Pineda; O J Ratcliffe; R R Samaha; R Creelman; M Pilgrim; P Broun; J Z Zhang; D Ghandehari; B K Sherman; G Yu Journal: Science Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Caifu Chen; Dana A Ridzon; Adam J Broomer; Zhaohui Zhou; Danny H Lee; Julie T Nguyen; Maura Barbisin; Nan Lan Xu; Vikram R Mahuvakar; Mark R Andersen; Kai Qin Lao; Kenneth J Livak; Karl J Guegler Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2005-11-27 Impact factor: 16.971