Literature DB >> 31438812

Antipredator strategies of pupae: how to avoid predation in an immobile life stage?

Carita Lindstedt1, Liam Murphy1, Johanna Mappes1.   

Abstract

Antipredator strategies of the pupal stage in insects have received little attention in comparison to larval or adult stages. This is despite the fact that predation risk can be high during the pupal stage, making it a critical stage for subsequent fitness. The immobile pupae are not, however, defenceless; a wide range of antipredator strategies have evolved against invertebrate and vertebrate predators. The most common strategy seems to be 'avoiding encounters with predators' by actively hiding in vegetation and soil or via cryptic coloration and masquerade. Pupae have also evolved behavioural and secondary defences such as defensive toxins, physical defences or deimatic movements and sounds. Interestingly, warning coloration used to advertise unprofitability has evolved very rarely, even though the pupal stage often contains defensive toxins in chemically defended species. In some species, pupae gain protection from conspecifics or mimic chemical and auditory signals and thereby manipulate other species to protect them. Our literature survey highlights the importance of studying selection pressures across an individual's life stages to predict how ontogenetic variation in selective environments shapes individual fitness and population dynamics in insects. Finally, we also suggest interesting avenues for future research to pursue. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of complete metamorphosis'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemical defence; physical defence; predator–prey interactions; protective coloration; pupal defence

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31438812      PMCID: PMC6711284          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  61 in total

1.  Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Growth and reproductive costs of larval defence in the aposematic lepidopteran Pieris brassicae.

Authors:  Andrew D Higginson; Jon Delf; Graeme D Ruxton; Michael P Speed
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Predation and associational refuge drive ontogenetic niche shifts in an arctiid caterpillar.

Authors:  Patrick Grof-Tisza; Marcel Holyoak; Edward Antell; Richard Karban
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Queen ants make distinctive sounds that are mimicked by a butterfly social parasite.

Authors:  Francesca Barbero; Jeremy A Thomas; Simona Bonelli; Emilio Balletto; Karsten Schönrogge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Changes in predator community structure shifts the efficacy of two warning signals in Arctiid moths.

Authors:  Ossi Nokelainen; Janne Valkonen; Carita Lindstedt; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Effects of a larval antipredator response and larval diet on adult phenotype in an aposematic ladybird beetle.

Authors:  Christopher P Grill; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Facts and myths of antibacterial properties of silk.

Authors:  Jasjeet Kaur; Rangam Rajkhowa; Tarannum Afrin; Takuya Tsuzuki; Xungai Wang
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Regulation of forest defoliating insects through small mammal predation: reconsidering the mechanisms.

Authors:  Ida Kollberg; Helena Bylund; Otso Huitu; Christer Björkman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Climate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web.

Authors:  Bradford C Lister; Andres Garcia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Complete metamorphosis of insects.

Authors:  Jens Rolff; Paul R Johnston; Stuart Reynolds
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Immune gene regulation in the gut during metamorphosis in a holo- versus a hemimetabolous insect.

Authors:  Paul R Johnston; Véronique Paris; Jens Rolff
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evaluating responses to temperature during pre-metamorphosis and carry-over effects at post-metamorphosis in the wood tiger moth (Arctia plantaginis).

Authors:  Juan A Galarza; Kishor Dhaygude; Behnaz Ghaedi; Kaisa Suisto; Janne Valkonen; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Glue Genes Are Subjected to Diverse Selective Forces during Drosophila Development.

Authors:  Flora Borne; Rob J Kulathinal; Virginie Courtier-Orgogozo
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Senescence as a trade-off between successful land colonisation and longevity: critical review and analysis of a hypothesis.

Authors:  Tomasz Bilinski; Aneta Bylak; Krzysztof Kukuła; Renata Zadrag-Tecza
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Drosophila glue protects from predation.

Authors:  Flora Borne; Stéphane R Prigent; Mathieu Molet; Virginie Courtier-Orgogozo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The impact of life stage and pigment source on the evolution of novel warning signal traits.

Authors:  Carita Lindstedt; Robin K Bagley; Sara Calhim; Mackenzie Jones; Catherine R Linnen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.171

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.