Literature DB >> 21155771

Growth and reproductive costs of larval defence in the aposematic lepidopteran Pieris brassicae.

Andrew D Higginson1, Jon Delf, Graeme D Ruxton, Michael P Speed.   

Abstract

1. Utilization of plant secondary compounds for antipredator defence is common in immature herbivorous insects. Such defences may incur a cost to the animal, either in terms of survival, growth rate or in the reproductive success. 2. A common defence in lepidopterans is the regurgitation of semi-digested material containing the defensive compounds of the food plant, a defence which has led to gut specialization in this order. Regurgitation is often swift in response to cuticular stimulation and deters predators from consuming or parasitizing the larva. The loss of food and other gut material seems likely to impact on fitness, but evidence is lacking. 3. Here, we raised larvae of the common crop pest Pieris brassicae on commercial cabbage leaves, simulated predator attacks throughout the larval period, and measured life-history responses. 4. We found that the probability of survival to pupation decreased with increasing frequency of attacks, but this was because of regurgitation rather than the stimulation itself. There was a growth cost to the defence such that the more regurgitant that individuals produced over the growth period, the smaller they were at pupation. 5. The number of mature eggs in adult females was positively related to pupal mass, but this relationship was only found when individuals were not subjected to a high frequency of predator simulation. This suggests that there might be cryptic fitness costs to common defensive responses that are paid despite apparent growth rate being maintained. 6. Our results demonstrate a clear life-history cost of an antipredator defence in a model pest species and show that under certain conditions, such as high predation threat, the expected relationship between female body size and potential fecundity can be disrupted.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2010 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21155771     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01786.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  12 in total

Review 1.  Antipredator strategies of pupae: how to avoid predation in an immobile life stage?

Authors:  Carita Lindstedt; Liam Murphy; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Ecological conditions alter cooperative behaviour and its costs in a chemically defended sawfly.

Authors:  Carita Lindstedt; Antti Miettinen; Dalial Freitak; Tarmo Ketola; Andres López-Sepulcre; Elina Mäntylä; Hannu Pakkanen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Costs and benefits of plant allelochemicals in herbivore diet in a multi enemy world.

Authors:  J H Reudler; C Lindstedt; H Pakkanen; I Lehtinen; J Mappes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Reproduction in Risky Environments: The Role of Invasive Egg Predators in Ladybird Laying Strategies.

Authors:  Sarah C Paul; Judith K Pell; Jonathan D Blount
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics.

Authors:  Christina G Halpin; John Skelhorn; Candy Rowe; Graeme D Ruxton; Andrew D Higginson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Gregariousness does not vary with geography, developmental stage, or group relatedness in feeding redheaded pine sawfly larvae.

Authors:  John W Terbot; Ryan L Gaynor; Catherine R Linnen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Larval exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid impacts adult size in the farmland butterfly Pieris brassicae.

Authors:  Penelope R Whitehorn; George Norville; Andre Gilburn; Dave Goulson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive.

Authors:  Craig A Barnett; Melissa Bateson; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Egg Production Constrains Chemical Defenses in a Neotropical Arachnid.

Authors:  Taís M Nazareth; Glauco Machado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The spitting image of plant defenses: Effects of plant secondary chemistry on the efficacy of caterpillar regurgitant as an anti-predator defense.

Authors:  Gaylord A Desurmont; Angela Köhler; Daniel Maag; Diane Laplanche; Hao Xu; Julien Baumann; Camille Demairé; Delphine Devenoges; Mara Glavan; Leslie Mann; Ted C J Turlings
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.