| Literature DB >> 31438584 |
Ali Mujtaba Shah1,2, Yimin Cai3, Huawei Zou1, Xiangfei Zhang1, Lizhi Wang1, Bai Xue1, Zhisheng Wang4, Quanhui Peng5.
Abstract
Thirty-two 6-month-old, healthy Nanjiang Yellow goats (34.6 ± 4.16 kg) were randomly divided into four treatments to evaluate the supplementary effects of branches and leaves trimmed from tea tree (BLTT) on growth performance, rumen fermentation characteristics, and meat composition in fattening goats. The control goats were fed a basal diet. Treatments 1, 2 and 3 were fed 2%, 4% and 6% of BLTT respectively. After a 60 d feeding trial, blood samples were collected for the analysis of the antioxidant profile and goats were slaughtered to obtain the rumen fluid and carcass samples for determination of rumen fermentation characteristics and meat composition perameters. Increased final body weight was observed in goats fed 4% BLTT compared with control. The activity of superoxide dismutase was increased in the 4% BLTT-treated group, while glutathione peroxidase and malondialdehyde followed the quadratic curve. Quadratic curves were also observed for villus height, crypt depth and the ratio of villus height to crypt depth in the jejunum. The quadratic effect was obtained for total essential amino acids, and individual amino acids threonine and leucine. The saturated fatty acid C16:0 was decreased with 4% of BLTT supplementation, and a quadratic effect was observed for polyunsaturated fatty acid C18:3 (n-3). To sum up, our findings revealed that BLTT supplementation has a positive effect on body antioxidative status, gastrointestinal development, rumen fermentation characteristics and overall growth performance and meat quality in goats.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidative capacity; goat; meat composition; tea plant
Year: 2019 PMID: 31438584 PMCID: PMC6769452 DOI: 10.3390/ani9090590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Effects of tea supplementation on growth performance of finishing goats.
| Treatments | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic |
| Initial BW (kg) | 32.4 | 32.7 | 32.4 | 32.3 | 0.550 | 0.638 | 0.748 |
| Final BW (kg) | 41.5 b | 42.9 a,b | 43.7 a | 41.5 b | 0.454 | 0.014 | 0.039 |
| ADG (g) | 151.7 b | 169.7 a,b | 189.9 a | 150.7 b | 10.275 | 0.144 | 0.070 |
| ADFI (g) | 1234 | 1316 | 1391 | 1218 | 44.5 | 0.111 | 0.108 |
| FCR | 8.82 | 7.82 | 7.75 | 8.43 | 0.656 | 0.289 | 0.471 |
a, b Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); T1, T2 and T3 = supplementation of 2%, 4% and 6% of branches and leaves trimmed from the tea tree. ADG = average daily gain, ADFI = average daily feed intake, FCR = feed conversion ratio; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effects of tea supplementation on plasma antioxidant capacity of finishing goats.
| Treatments | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic |
| SOD (U/mL) | 76.77 b | 82.12 a,b | 86.24 a | 75.80 b | 1.700 | 0.001 | 0.472 |
| GSH-Px (U/mL) | 157.55 b | 163.64 a,b | 169.73 a | 160.64 a,b | 3.453 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 5.74 a | 4.41 b | 4.47 b | 5.81 a | 0.311 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
a,b Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); T1, T2 and T3 = supplementation of 2%, 4% and 6% of branches and leaves trimmed from the tea tree. SOD = superoxide dismutase, GSH-Px = glutathione peroxidase, MDA = malondialdehyde; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effects of tea supplementation on small intestine development of finishing goats.
| Treatments | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic |
| Jejunum | |||||||
| Villus height (μm) | 591.3 b | 608.5 a,b | 637.9 a | 587.5 b | 10.73 | 0.153 | 0.029 |
| Crypt depth (μm) | 261.1 a,b | 264.9 a | 242.6 c | 245.9 b,c | 4.700 | 0.172 | 0.001 |
| Villus height/Crypt depth | 2.27 b | 2.30 b | 2.63 a | 2.39 a,b | 0.069 | 0.991 | 0.001 |
| Ileum | |||||||
| Villus height (μm) | 471.8 b | 500.1 a | 495.3 a,b | 483.1 a,b | 6.53 | 0.005 | 0.175 |
| Crypt depth (μm) | 239.0 | 240.8 | 241.1 | 246.4 | 4.067 | 0.898 | 0.504 |
| Villus height/Crypt depth | 1.98 | 2.08 | 2.06 | 1.97 | 0.044 | 0.053 | 0.682 |
a–c Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); T1, T2 and T3 = supplementation of 2%, 4% and 6% of branches and leaves trimmed from the tea tree. SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 1Histological diagram of sections of small intestine (hematoxylin and eosin staining) in each group. BLTT = Branches leaves trimmed tea plant.
Effects of tea supplementation on rumen fermentation characteristics of finishing goats.
| Item | Treatments | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| pH | 5.86 | 5.89 | 6.18 | 6.24 | 0.173 | 0.708 | 0.086 |
| Acetate (%) | 63.44 a | 57.61 b | 58.07 b | 58.83 b | 1.534 | 0.025 | 0.002 |
| Propionate (%) | 16.91 b | 16.75 b | 19.01 a | 17.54 a,b | 0.034 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Butyrate (%) | 5.82 | 5.98 | 6.24 | 5.63 | 0.450 | 0.680 | 0.687 |
| TVFA (mmol/L) | 90.05 | 87.00 | 89.68 | 89.20 | 1.459 | 0.143 | 0.694 |
| MCP (mg/dL) | 6.60 c | 7.21 b,c | 8.41 a | 7.78 a,b | 0.288 | 0.459 | <0.001 |
| NH3-N (mg/dL) | 29.88 a | 27.01 a,b | 23.45 b | 24.95 a,b | 1.292 | 0.390 | 0.001 |
| Acetate: Propionate | 3.76 a | 3.47 a,b | 3.06 b | 3.37 a,b | 0.115 | 0.214 | <0.001 |
a–c Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); T1, T2 and T3 = supplementation of 2%, 4% and 6% of branches and leaves trimmed from the tea tree. SEM = standard error of the mean, TVFA = total volatile fatty acids, MCP = microbial protein, NH3-N = ammonia nitrogen.
Effects of tea supplementation on muscle composition (%) of finishing goats.
| Item | Treatments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic | |
| Moisture | 71.04 a,b | 70.24 b,c | 69.34 c | 71.38 a | 0.375 | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Protein | 20.95 | 21.30 | 21.97 | 21.03 | 0.407 | 0.494 | 0.155 |
| Fat | 6.69 a | 6.41 a | 6.08 b | 6.37 a | 0.156 | 0.336 | 0.019 |
| Ash | 0.97 | 1.06 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.038 | 0.061 | 0.274 |
a–c Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); T1, T2 and T3 = supplementation of 2%, 4% and 6% of branches and leaves trimmed from the tea tree. SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effects of tea supplementation on muscle amino acids profile (mg/g protein) of finishing goats.
| Item | Treatments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic | |
| TEAA | 90.69 | 92.38 | 93.41 | 92.07 | 0.775 | 0.191 | 0.046 |
| Lys | 15.59 | 16.43 | 16.19 | 15.74 | 0.386 | 0.110 | 0.689 |
| Phe | 7.74 | 8.05 | 7.81 | 7.98 | 0.135 | 0.188 | 0.973 |
| Met | 5.11 | 4.88 | 5.00 | 5.36 | 0.157 | 0.116 | 0.669 |
| Thr | 8.05 | 7.97 | 8.40 | 8.18 | 0.140 | 0.525 | 0.044 |
| Ile | 7.58 | 7.76 | 7.84 | 7.97 | 0.187 | 0.805 | 0.247 |
| Leu | 14.59 b | 15.01 a,b | 15.51 a | 14.66 b | 0.178 | 0.067 | 0.009 |
| Val | 7.09 | 7.34 | 7.29 | 7.07 | 0.129 | 0.111 | 0.720 |
| Arg | 12.88 | 12.56 | 13.11 | 12.85 | 0.463 | 0.612 | 0.574 |
| His | 6.06 | 6.22 | 6.08 | 6.06 | 0.145 | 0.387 | 0.774 |
| Cys | 1.65 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.61 | 0.060 | 0.765 | 0.959 |
| Tyr | 4.36 | 4.50 | 4.51 | 4.59 | 0.085 | 0.536 | 0.212 |
| TNEAA | 86.45 | 86.20 | 87.95 | 87.32 | 0.678 | 0.569 | 0.060 |
| Asp | 15.33 | 16.37 | 16.29 | 16.31 | 0.382 | 0.138 | 0.164 |
| Ser | 7.95 | 7.36 | 7.62 | 7.95 | 0.176 | 0.011 | 0.900 |
| Glu | 29.54 a | 26.56 b | 27.22 a,b | 28.17 a,b | 0.760 | 0.012 | 0.247 |
| Gly | 8.61 | 8.98 | 8.96 | 8.72 | 0.192 | 0.178 | 0.476 |
| Ala | 9.88 | 9.77 | 9.88 | 10.11 | 0.182 | 0.419 | 0.577 |
a,b Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); T1, T2 and T3 = supplementation of 2%, 4% and 6% of branches and leaves trimmed from the tea tree. SEM, standard error of the mean; TEAA, total essential amino acids; TNEAA, total non-essential amino acids.
Effects of tea supplementation on muscle fatty acids profile (g/100 g sample) of finishing goats.
| Item | Treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic | |
| Myristic acid C14:0 | 0.162 | 0.162 | 0.161 | 0.162 | 0.003 | 0.849 | 0.927 |
| Pentadecylic acid C15:0 | 0.029 | 0.03 | 0.028 | 0.028 | 0.013 | 0.483 | 0.53 |
| Palmitic acid C16:0 | 2.197 a | 2.163 a,b | 2.035 b | 2.115 a,b | 0.04 | 0.037 | 0.178 |
| Palmitoleic acid C16:1 | 1.805 | 1.751 | 1.751 | 1.741 | 0.031 | 0.371 | 0.27 |
| Margaric acid C17:0 | 0.164 | 0.163 | 0.164 | 0.167 | 0.003 | 0.499 | 0.758 |
| Stearic acid C18:0 | 1.626 | 1.677 | 1.645 | 1.644 | 0.033 | 0.277 | 0.995 |
| Octadecenoic acids C18:1 | 2.143 | 1.978 | 1.996 | 2.039 | 0.049 | 0.037 | 0.165 |
| Linoleic acid C18:2 (n−6) | 3.62 b | 3.82 a | 3.66 b | 3.66 b | 0.066 | 0.427 | 0.341 |
| α-Linolenic acid C18:3 (n−3) | 0.26 b | 0.27 b | 0.29 a | 0.29 a | 0.01 | 0.937 | 0.012 |
| Arachidic acid C20:0 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.0004 | 0.915 | 0.136 |
| Eicosatetraenoic acid C20:4 (n−3) | 0.011 | 0.01 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.0003 | 0.092 | 0.325 |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid C20:5 (n−3) | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.0006 | 0.492 | 0.807 |
| Behenic acid C22:0 | 0.016 | 0.017 | 0.016 | 0.017 | 0.0003 | 0.199 | 0.129 |
| Docosapentaenoic acid C22:5 (n−30) | 0.028 | 0.024 | 0.026 | 0.024 | 0.001 | 0.138 | 0.263 |
| Lignoceric acid C24:0 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.0003 | 0.134 | 0.762 |
| Rumenic acid c9, t11-CLA | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.0003 | 0.61 | 0.983 |
| t10, c1-2CLA | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.0003 | 0.882 | 0.783 |
| ∑SFA | 4.218 | 4.235 | 4.071 | 4.157 | 0.046 | 0.262 | 0.245 |
| ∑MUFA | 3.948 | 3.729 | 3.749 | 3.783 | 0.067 | 0.052 | 0.133 |
| ∑PUFA | 3.970 | 4.175 | 4.038 | 4.036 | 0.003 | 0.984 | 0.741 |
a–c Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); T1, T2 and T3 = supplementation of 2%, 4% and 6% of branches and leaves trimmed from the tea tree. SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; SEM, standard error of the mean.
(A)
| Ingredients | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 45.5 | 45.5 | 45.5 | 45.5 |
| Wheat bran | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Soybean meal | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Canola meal | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Salt | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Vitamin and minerals premix 1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Calcium hydrophosphate | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Calcium carbonate | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Rice straw | 15.0 | 14.0 | 13.0 | 12.0 |
| Corn silage | 15.0 | 14.0 | 13.0 | 12.0 |
| DDGS | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| BLTT 2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| Nutritive content 3 | ||||
| DM | 76.86 | 76.31 | 75.76 | 75.21 |
| DE (MJ/kg) 4 | 11.33 | 11.34 | 11.36 | 11.38 |
| CP | 10.89 | 11.05 | 11.13 | 11.32 |
| EE | 2.89 | 3.03 | 3.01 | 3.04 |
| NDF | 31.17 | 30.18 | 29.79 | 29.14 |
| ADF | 18.66 | 18.34 | 18.32 | 18.11 |
| Ash | 6.31 | 6.26 | 6.21 | 6.16 |
| Ca | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.88 |
| P | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
1 The premix provides per kg diet: Fe in the form of sulfate 60 mg, Cu in the form of sulfate 8 mg, Zn in the form of sulfate 40 mg, Mn in the form of sulfate 40 mg, Co in the form of chloride 0.2 mg, I in the form of iodate 0.3 mg, Se in the form of selenite 0.2 mg and, Vitamin A 10000 IU, Vitamin D 1000 IU, and Vitamin E 80 IU; 2 BLTT, Branches and leaves trimmed from the tea tree; 3 DE of BLTT was calculated with the equation DE (MJ/kg) = 3813.89 − 15.94 * CF (%) − 13.94 * CP (%), and the 4 DE of TMR was calculated values based on the formula DE (MJ/kg) available DE data of the ingredients used. CP, EE, NDF, ADF, Ca and P were calculated values according to the formula; DDGS = Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles, DM = dry matter, D = Digestable energy, CP = Crude protein, EE = Ether extract, NDF = Neutral Detergent Fiber, ADF = Acid Detergent Fiber, Ca = Calcium, P = Phosphorus.
(B)
| Content | Quantity |
|---|---|
| Dry matter (%) | 36.62 |
| CP (%) | 20.14 |
| Ether Extract (%) | 03.10 |
| NDF (%) | 35.26 |
| ADF (%) | 28.43 |
| ADL (%) | 03.53 |
| Ca (%) | 0.24 |
| P (%) | 0.11 |
| Catechins | (%) |
| Catechin | 0.34 |
| Epicatechin | 1.74 |
| Epigallocatechin | 5.27 |
| Epicatechin gallate | 2.14 |
| Epigallocatechin-3 gallate | 8.52 |
| Total Phenolic acid | 1.79 |
| Total Alkaloids | 6.89 |
| Total Caffeine | 1.88 |
| Total Tannins | 0.22 |
| Essential Amino acid | mg/100 g |
| Lysine (Lys) | 0.33 |
| Methionine (Met) | 0.07 |
| Threonine (Thr) | 0.48 |
| Valine (Val) | 0.39 |
| Isoleucine (Ile) | 0.03 |
| Leucine (Leu) | 0.06 |
| Phenylalanine (Phe) | 0.18 |
| Vitamins | mg/100 g |
| Vitamin A | 1.12 |
| Vitamin E | 22.10 |
| Vitamin B1 | 1.92 |
| Vitamin B2 | 8.12 |
| Vitamin C | 21.20 |
| Vitamin K | 7.12 |