| Literature DB >> 31438505 |
Maqsood Ahmed1, Mingshan Ji2, Aatika Sikandar1, Aafia Iram3, Peiwen Qin1, He Zhu1, Ansar Javeed4, Jamil Shafi5, Zeeshan Iqbal6, Mazher Farid Iqbal4, Zhonghua Sun1.
Abstract
Sagittaria trifolia is a medicinal foodstuff of China and East Asia belonging to the family Alismataceae. Samples of S. trifolia tubers were collected from Meihekow, Siping, Jilin, Harbin and Wuchang from Northeast China. The current study was aimed to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative analysis, antioxidant activity, biochemical analysis and chemical composition of different populations of S. trifolia. By using Folin-Ciocalteu, aluminium chloride colourimetric and 1,1-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), total phenol and flavonoids content and antioxidant activity was analysed. Furthermore, chemical composition, biochemical analysis and mineral substances were also determined. The results showed the presence of flavonoids, phenols, saponins, tannins, glycosides and steroids except for alkaloids and terpenoids by qualitative analysis. Quantitative analysis revealed that highest total phenol, flavonoids content and antioxidant potential identified from Meihekow, i.e., 2.307 mg GAE/g, 12.263 mg QE/g and 77.373%, respectively. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry results showed the presence of 40 chemical compounds corresponding to 99.44% of total extract that might be responsible for antioxidant properties. Mineral and biochemical analysis revealed the presence of calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, iron, copper, zinc and, carbohydrate, protein, fibre and fat contents, respectively. Interestingly, all S. trifolia populations collected from different locations possess similar composition. The dietary values, phytoconstituents, antioxidant activities and nutritional and curative chemical compounds of S. trifolia are beneficial for the nutritherapy of human beings.Entities:
Keywords: DPPH; Sagittaria trifolia; biochemical composition; phenol and flavonoids content; phytochemicals
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31438505 PMCID: PMC6749360 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24173025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Extract yield (g) obtained from different populations of S. trifolia. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error. The same letters on bars indicated that the values are not significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD at the p > 0.05 level. N = number of replications; df = degree of freedom.
Qualitative phytochemical screening of S. trifolia populations.
| Treatments (Populations) | Phytochemical Constituents | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | Tannins | Glycosides | Terpenoids | Steroids | Flavonoids | Flavones | Phenols | Saponins | |
| MHK | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| GL-G | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| JL-O | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| HNW | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| WC-XC | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
Where: + presence, − absence; MHK (Meihekow); GL-G (Siping); JL-O (Jilin); HNW (Harbin); WC-XC (Wuchang).
Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoids content (TFC) and DPPH radical scavenging activity of S. trifolia populations.
| Treatments (Populations) | Total Phenolic Content mg GAE/g | Total Flavonoids Content mg QE/g | DPPH Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MHK | 2.307 ± 0.49 a | 12.263 ± 0.49 a | 77.347 ± 1.30 a |
| GL-G | 2.050 ± 0.61 ab | 10.690 ± 0.36 bc | 75.780 ± 0.37 a |
| JL-O | 1.370 ± 0.12 c | 9.210 ± 0.19 c | 63.670 ± 1.09 c |
| HNW | 1.883 ± 0.82 b | 10.390 ± 0.24 b | 71.233 ± 1.18 b |
| WC-XC | 2.090 ± 0.57 ab | 11.760 ± 0.20 a | 67.223 ± 1.74 c |
| Statistics | |||
| summary | S.S = 1.491 | S.S = 16.743 | S.S = 523.743 |
| M.S = 4.314 | M.S = 130.936 | M.S = 0.373 | |
| DF = 4 | DF = 4 | DF = 4 |
Values are presented as the mean ± standard error. The same letters within a column indicated that values are not significantly different at (p > 0.05) according to Tukey’s HSD; MHK (Meihekow); GL-G (Siping); JL-O (Jilin); HNW (Harbin); WC-XC (Wuchang); GAE (Gallic acid); QE (Quercetin).
Chemical composition of methanol extract of S. trifolia leaves.
| Peak. # | Name of Compound | Area % | M.F | M.W |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pentanoic acid, 2-[(phenylmethoxy) imino]-, trimethylsilyl ester | 7.08 | C15H23NO3Si | 293.43 |
| 2 | Ethyl isopropyl ether | 1.63 | C5H12O | 88.15 |
| 3 | Cyclohexadien-4-one-1-propiolic acid, methyl ester | 0.57 | C10H12O3 | 180.20 |
| 4 | 2,6-Dimethoxytoluene | 0.42 | C9H12O2 | 152.19 |
| 5 | Ethyl Propyl Ketone | 0.35 | C6H12O | 100.16 |
| 6 | 2-Oxiranecarboxylic acid, 3-(2,2-dimethoxyethyl)-3-methyl-, methyl ester | 1.33 | C9H16O5 | 204.22 |
| 7 | Methyl valerate | 0.61 | C6H12O2 | 116.16 |
| 8 | Furfural/Furaldehyde | 2.87 | C5H4O2 | 96.08 |
| 9 | 3-Methoxyphenyl isocyanate | 3.09 | C8H7NO2 | 149.14 |
| 10 | 2-Methylbenzoic acid, pentafluorobenzyl ester | 1.04 | C15H9F5O2 | 316.22 |
| 11 | Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-2-methoxy-3,5,6-trimethyl-, methyl ester | 0.42 | C12H16O4 | 224.25 |
| 12 | Methylhexanoate | 0.28 | C7H14O2 | 130.18 |
| 13 | Dihydromesoanthramine | 0.46 | C14H13N | 195.26 |
| 14 | Methyl Thenoate | 1.62 | C6H6O2S | 142.17 |
| 15 | Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane | 0.22 | C8H24O4Si4 | 296.61 |
| 16 | 2-(2-Furyl)-7-methyl-4-quinolinecarboxylic acid | 0.62 | C15H11NO3 | 253.25 |
| 17 | 1,3,5,7-Tetraethyl-1-methoxycyclotetrasiloxane | 0.46 | C9H23O5Si4 | 323.61 |
| 18 | Hendecane | 0.25 | C11H24 | 156.31 |
| 19 | Methylbenzoate | 0.71 | C8H8O2 | 136.15 |
| 20 | MethylOctanoate | 0.43 | C9H18O2 | 158.24 |
| 21 | Dodecane | 1.91 | C12H26 | 170.34 |
| 22 | Hasubanan-9-ol,7,8-didehydro-4,5-epoxy-3,6,6-trimethoxy-17-methyl-,(5.alpha.,9.alpha.,13.beta.,14.beta.)- | 0.23 | C20H25NO5 | 359.42 |
| 23 | Dicetyl | 0.23 | C32H66 | 450.88 |
| 24 | 5-(Hydroxymethyl)-2-(dimethoxymethyl)furan | 3.42 | C8H12O4 | 172.18 |
| 25 | Tetradecane | 0.35 | C14H30 | 198.39 |
| 26 | Pentadecane | 0.34 | C15H32 | 212.42 |
| 27 | Phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) | 1.47 | Unknown | - |
| 28 | Cetane | 0.46 | C16H34 | 226.44 |
| 29 | Glycol Bromohydrin | 0.54 | C2H5BrO | 124.96 |
| 30 | Fitone | 1.08 | C18H36O | 268.48 |
| 31 | Ethaneperoxoic acid, 1-cyano-1-[2-(2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)ethyl] pentyl ester | 0.39 | C19H25NO5 | 347.41 |
| 32 | Methylisopalmitate | 2.84 | C17H34O2 | 270.45 |
| 33 | 1-Methyl-1-hydroxymethyladamantane | 1.55 | C12H20O | 180.29 |
| 34 | Sclarene | 3.11 | C20H32 | 272.47 |
| 35 | ManoylOxide | 5.62 | C20H34O | 290.49 |
| 36 | Phenylacetic acid, 2-methylcyclohex-2-enyl ester | 34.30 | C15H18O2 | 230.30 |
| 37 | Methylstearate | 1.26 | C19H38O2 | 298.51 |
| 38 | 3-Octadecyne | 7.72 | C18H34 | 250.47 |
| 39 | 16-Kaurene | 5.36 | C20H32 | 272.47 |
| 40 | Kaurene-19-ol | 3.37 | C20H34O | 290.49 |
M.F (molecular formula); M.W (molecular weight).
Figure 2Biochemical composition of S. trifolia. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error. The same letters on bars indicated that the values are not significantly different according to the Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05. M.E (mineral element); C.F (crude fibre), CHO (carbohydrates), C.P (crude protein), D.M (dry matter/ash), F (Fats); MHK (Meihekou), GL-G (Jilin), JL-O (Siping), HNW (Harbin), WC-XC (Wuchang).
Figure 3Mineral elements (%) in S. trifolia leaves. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error. The same letters within a column indicate that the mean values are not significantly different according to the Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05. MHK (Meihekou), GL-G (Jilin), JL-O (Siping), HNW (Harbin), WC-XC (Wuchang).
Figure 4Mineral element (mg/100 g) in S. trifolia leaves. Values are represented as the mean ± standard error. The same letters within column indicates that the mean values are not significantly different according to the Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05. MHK (Meihekou), GL-G (Jilin), JL-O (Siping), HNW (Harbin), WC-XC (Wuchang).
Figure 5Sagittaria trifolia: (a) newly sprouted corms; (b) plants at 6–7 leaves stage.
Methods for the determination of biochemical components of S. trifolia.
| Sr. No. | Biochemical Components | Methods | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dry matter/moisture | 1 g of sample was placed in air oven for one day at 105 °C. Moisture content was calculated by before and after weight difference of petri dishes. | [ |
| 2 | Fat | 2 g of sample was poured into Soxhlet extraction thimble with addition of 100 mL of petroleum ether in round bottom flask placed at 55 °C for three h until later is siphoned into the receiving flask and was cooled for 10 min. Obtained material was placed in air oven for 60 min at 100 °C and the amount of collected oil (fat) was calculated. | [ |
| 3 | Protein | 2 g of sample was mixed with 3 g of digestion mixture (94 g K2SO4 + 5 g FeSO4 + 1 g CuSO4) with addition of 12 mL of conc. sulphuric acid (H2SO4) into the digestion flask. Consequent mixture was heated until it become clear and then on cooling a few drops of 3% boric acid was added for titration followed by few drops of methyl orange and then mixture was completely assorted by continuous hand stirring. Subsequently to this, 10 mL of 0.1N H2SO4 was taken in burette and titrated until colour changed. | [ |
| 4 | Crude fibre | To calculate crude fibre, briefly, 2 g of sample was dissolved in 200 mL of 1.25% sulphuric acid (H2SO4) and boiled for 30 min and then filtered. The filtrate was washed with hot water 3–4 times to reduce the acidity. Mixture was re-digested in 200 mL of 1.25% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and heated, filtered and washed with hot water 3–4 times. After drying the filtrate for 15 min at 100 °C, it was weighed and placed in an electric muffle furnace at 550 °C for 3 h and was re-weighed on cooling for calculating the crude fibre. | [ |
| 5 | Carbohydrate | Carbohydrate was calculated by the difference method by subtracting the values of total moisture, mineral, fat, protein and fibre. | [ |
| 6 | Mineral element/ash | 2 g of sample was placed in electric muffle furnace at 550 °C for 6 h in already weighed porcelain dishes and on cooling reweighed to calculate mineral element/ash. | [ |