Jeffrey D Edwards1, Howard B Panitch2, Judith E Nelson3,4, Rachel L Miller5,6, Marilyn C Morris1. 1. Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics. 2. Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and. 3. Critical Care Service and. 4. Palliative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 5. Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, and. 6. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Abstract
Rationale: The decision whether to initiate or forgo long-term ventilation for children can be difficult and impactful. However, little has been published on the informational and decisional needs of families facing this decision. Objectives: To assess what families with children with chronic respiratory failure and life-limiting conditions need and want for informed decision-making. Methods: English- and Spanish-speaking parents who were facing (contemporaneous decision makers) or had previously faced (former decision makers) a decision regarding invasive or noninvasive long-term ventilation for their children were recruited using convenience sampling. Patients who were older and cognitively capable also were invited to participate. We performed semistructured interviews using an open-ended interview guide developed de novo to assess parents' decisional needs and experiences. Qualitative data analysis used a thematic approach based on framework analysis, and thematic saturation was a goal. Results: A sample of 44 parents and 2 patients from 43 families was interviewed. All contemporaneous decision makers (n = 28) favored or believed that they would choose long-term ventilation. Fifteen of 16 former decision makers chose long-term ventilation. Thematic saturation was achieved from the perspective of parents who favored or chose long-term ventilation. Four domains were identified: parents' emotional and psychological experiences with decision-making, parents' informational needs, parents' communication and decision support needs, and parents' views on the option not to initiate long-term ventilation. For most parents, making a decision regarding long-term ventilation was stressful, even though they articulated goals and values that could/did guide their decision-making. In general, parents wanted comprehensive information, including what life would be like at home for the child and the family. They wanted their medical providers to be honest, tactful, patient, and supportive. Parents reported that they felt being presented with the option not to initiate was acceptable.Conclusions: In this study, we identified specific informational and decision-making needs regarding long-term ventilation that parents facing decisions feel are important. These data suggest that providers should present families with comprehensive, balanced information on the impact of long-term ventilation and, when the child has a profoundly serious and life-limiting condition, explore the option not to initiate long-term ventilation.
Rationale: The decision whether to initiate or forgo long-term ventilation for children can be difficult and impactful. However, little has been published on the informational and decisional needs of families facing this decision. Objectives: To assess what families with children with chronic respiratory failure and life-limiting conditions need and want for informed decision-making. Methods: English- and Spanish-speaking parents who were facing (contemporaneous decision makers) or had previously faced (former decision makers) a decision regarding invasive or noninvasive long-term ventilation for their children were recruited using convenience sampling. Patients who were older and cognitively capable also were invited to participate. We performed semistructured interviews using an open-ended interview guide developed de novo to assess parents' decisional needs and experiences. Qualitative data analysis used a thematic approach based on framework analysis, and thematic saturation was a goal. Results: A sample of 44 parents and 2 patients from 43 families was interviewed. All contemporaneous decision makers (n = 28) favored or believed that they would choose long-term ventilation. Fifteen of 16 former decision makers chose long-term ventilation. Thematic saturation was achieved from the perspective of parents who favored or chose long-term ventilation. Four domains were identified: parents' emotional and psychological experiences with decision-making, parents' informational needs, parents' communication and decision support needs, and parents' views on the option not to initiate long-term ventilation. For most parents, making a decision regarding long-term ventilation was stressful, even though they articulated goals and values that could/did guide their decision-making. In general, parents wanted comprehensive information, including what life would be like at home for the child and the family. They wanted their medical providers to be honest, tactful, patient, and supportive. Parents reported that they felt being presented with the option not to initiate was acceptable.Conclusions: In this study, we identified specific informational and decision-making needs regarding long-term ventilation that parents facing decisions feel are important. These data suggest that providers should present families with comprehensive, balanced information on the impact of long-term ventilation and, when the child has a profoundly serious and life-limiting condition, explore the option not to initiate long-term ventilation.
Authors: Elaine C Meyer; Deborah E Sellers; David M Browning; Kimberly McGuffie; Mildred Z Solomon; Robert D Truog Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Diane V Murrell; Timothy E Lotze; Harold J Farber; Claire A Crawford; Constance M Wiemann Journal: J Child Neurol Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: Laura G Amar-Dolan; Mary H Horn; Brianna O'Connell; Susan K Parsons; Christopher J Roussin; Peter H Weinstock; Robert J Graham Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2020-07
Authors: Jeffrey D Edwards; Howard B Panitch; Maureen George; Anne-Marie Cirrilla; Eli Grunstein; Joanne Wolfe; Judith E Nelson; Rachel L Miller Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2020-12-23
Authors: Erick Forno; Steven H Abman; Jagdev Singh; Mary E Robbins; Hiran Selvadurai; Paul T Schumacker; Paul D Robinson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Mary Brigid Quirke; Denise Alexander; Kate Masterson; Jo Greene; Cathal Walsh; Piet Leroy; Jay Berry; Lee Polikoff; Maria Brenner Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 4.612