| Literature DB >> 31436554 |
Shun Sato1, Takahiro Kimura2, Takashi Yorozu1, Hajime Onuma2, Kosuke Iwatani2, Shin Egawa2, Masahiro Ikegami1, Hiroyuki Takahashi1.
Abstract
Recent discussions have suggested expanding the inclusion criteria for active prostate cancer surveillance to include cases with a Gleason score (GS) of 3+4=7. In this study, we examined this proposed use of a limited percent Gleason pattern 4 (%GP4) to identify candidates of active surveillance among 315 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with a GS of 6 or 3+4=7 via needle biopsy. The latter cases were divided into 4 groups using highest or overall %GP4 cut-off values of 5% and 10% as determined from prostate needle biopsies. The frequency of adverse pathology and risk of biochemical recurrence were compared between the GS 6 and both GS 3+4=7 groups. Adverse pathology was defined as a GS 4+3=7 or higher, pT3b staging or positive lymph node metastasis. Notably, the Gleason pattern 4 <5% and GS 6 groups did not differ significantly in terms of the frequency of adverse pathology and risk of biochemical recurrence by the highest method. However, other highest Gleason pattern 4 categories had significantly higher frequencies and risks. Using the overall method, even the Gleason pattern 4 <5% group had a significantly higher frequency of adverse pathology and risk of biochemical recurrence relative to the GS 6 group. In conclusion, our findings suggest that patients with a GS 3+4=7 on biopsy with a highest %GP4 <5% are similar candidates for active surveillance to men with GS 6 cancers.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31436554 DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001345
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Surg Pathol ISSN: 0147-5185 Impact factor: 6.394