Literature DB >> 31433566

Sutural Morphology in the Craniofacial Skeleton: A Descriptive Microcomputed Tomography Study in a Swine Model.

Fabio Savoldi1,2, James K H Tsoi1, Corrado Paganelli2, Jukka P Matinlinna1.   

Abstract

Sutures are greatly involved in both normal craniofacial growth and developmental anomalies. Having clear parameters for defining their morphology is fundamental to properly investigate their physiological or pathological development. However, the current literature is lacking of well-defined methods for the assessment of these structures. This study performed a comprehensive microcomputed tomography (μCT) analysis of a swine model evaluating morphological variation of sutures in different skull regions. Seventy-two suture samples were removed from one swine (Sus scrofa), approximately 9-12-month-old. Each sample was analyzed with μCT in the parallel (PAR) and perpendicular (PER) plane with respect to the bone surface. Suture width (S w ), linear obliteration index (LOI), and linear interdigitation index (LII) were calculated in each of the two reference planes, and sutures were categorized in four types (S t ). Parameters were compared among the facial, craniofacial, and cranial region. Description of the main morphological parameters was provided, and differences were found between the parallel and perpendicular planes. S t varied depending on the skull region, with simple sutures more represented in the cranial region. LII in the perpendicular plane decreased from facial to craniofacial and cranial region. S w in the parallel plane decreased from facial and craniofacial to cranial region. In the swine model, the sutural width, linear interdigitation, and suture type were related to distinct skull regions. The suture type was introduced to allow a better morphological characterization of sutures as 3D structures. Clear definition of sutural parameters is important for appropriate description of these complex structures. Anat Rec, 302:2156-2163, 2019.
© 2019 American Association for Anatomy. © 2019 American Association for Anatomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; bone; computerized tomography; craniofacial; distraction osteogenesis; structure

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31433566     DOI: 10.1002/ar.24230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  3 in total

1.  Anteroposterior length of the maxillary complex and its relationship with the anterior cranial base.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Francesca Massetti; James K H Tsoi; Jukka P Matinlinna; Andy W K Yeung; Ray Tanaka; Corrado Paganelli; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Appropriateness of standard cephalometric norms for the assessment of dentofacial characteristics in patients with cleidocranial dysplasia.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Francesca Del Re; Ingrid Tonni; Min Gu; Domenico Dalessandri; Luca Visconti
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Midpalatal suture maturation staging using cone beam computed tomography in patients aged between 9 to 21 years.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Ki Kwan Wong; Andy W K Yeung; James K H Tsoi; Min Gu; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.