| Literature DB >> 31432336 |
M D Slooter1, R D Blok1,2, D D Wisselink1, C J Buskens1, W A Bemelman1, P J Tanis1, R Hompes3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During creation of a pedicled omentoplasty, blood flow to segments of the omentum might become compromised. If unrecognized, this can lead to omental necrosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential added intra-operative value of the use of fluorescence angiography (FA) with indocyanine green (ICG) to assess omental perfusion.Entities:
Keywords: Fluorescence angiography; Indocyanine green (ICG); Omentoplasty; Pelvic filling; Rectal surgery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31432336 PMCID: PMC6736781 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02048-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tech Coloproctol ISSN: 1123-6337 Impact factor: 3.781
Baseline characteristics and surgical procedures
| FA ( | |
|---|---|
| Age, years | 55 (range 23–82) |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 27 (range 20–42) |
| Comorbidity | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 3/15 (20%) |
| Pulmonary diseases | 1/15 (6.7%) |
| Cardiovascular diseases | 6/15 (40%) |
| Smoking | |
| Yes | 3/15 (20%) |
| No | 12/15 (80%) |
| ASA | |
| < 3 | 8/15 (53.3%) |
| 3 | 7/15 (46.7%) |
| Primary disease | |
| Crohn’s disease | 6/15 (40%) |
| Rectal cancer | 8/15 (53.3%) |
| Cervical cancer | 1/15 (6.7%) |
| Prior treatment | |
| Biologicals < 3 monthsa | 2/6 (33.3%) |
| Neoadjuvant (chemo)radiationb | 7/9 (77.8%) |
| Prior interventions | |
| Abscess drainage | 4/15 (26.7%) |
| Ileo-/colostomy | 15/15 (100%) |
| LAR/Hartmann | 6/15 (40%) |
| APR | 1/15 (6.7%) |
| Re-do | 1/15 (6.7%) |
| EVAC | 3/15 (20%) |
| Indication surgery | |
| Therapy refractory disease | 6/6 (100%) |
| Presacral sinus | 6/9 (66.7%) |
| Otherc | 3/9 (33.3%) |
| Surgical procedure | |
| Intersphincteric proct(ocolec)tomy | 7/15 (46.7%) |
| Resection anastomosis | 5/15 (33.3%) |
| Debridement sinus | 7/15 (46.7%) |
| Total exenteration | 1/15 (6.7%) |
| Other | 1/15 (6.7%) |
| Abdominal approach | |
| Laparoscopy | 12/15 (80%) |
| Laparotomy | 3/15 (20%) |
| Perineal approach | |
| TAMIS | 14/15 (93.3%) |
| Open | 1/15 (6.7%) |
| Pedicled omentoplasty | |
| Left gastroepiploic artery | 9/15 (60%) |
| Right gastroepiploic artery | 6/15 (40%) |
| Route to pelvic | |
| Left paracolic gutter | 6/15 (40%) |
| Trans mesocolic, medial to colostomy | 8/15 (53.3%) |
| Supracolic, medial to colostomy | 1/15 (6.7%) |
BMI Body mass index, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists Score, LAR Low anterior resection, APR Abdominoperineal resection, EVAC Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, TAMIS Transanal minimally invasive surgery
aThe patients with Crohn’s disease
bThe patients with malign diseases (rectal and cervical cancer)
cNamely: radiation necrosis with vesico- and rectovaginal fistulas, near circumferential anastomotic dehiscence with pelvic sepsis, or synchronous double tumor of colon/rectum, blow-out colon and abscess
Fig. 1An example of fluorescence angiography after a pedicled omental flap creation. White light is the standard view and shows no areas suspect for decreased perfusion. NIRF is the near-infrared fluorescent signal of ICG. Merge is the overlay of the white light and NIRF, with the fluorescent signal displayed in pseudo green. The technique points out the areas that are perfused and poorly perfused. The red line demonstrates the demarcation line along which additional tissue was excised
Fluorescence angiography
| FA ( | |
|---|---|
| Change in management | 12/15 (80%) |
| Additional excised tissue (g) | 44 (12–198) |
| Added surgical time (min) | 8 (3–39) |
| Time of injection to first fluorescence (s) | 20 (9–37) |
| Time of first fluorescence to demarcation line (s) | 12 (7–22) |
Fig. 2Contrast quantification a signal-to-baseline ratio, b contrast-to-noise ratio