Literature DB >> 31432087

A Darwinian Uncertainty Principle.

Olivier Gascuel1, Mike Steel2.   

Abstract

Reconstructing ancestral characters and traits along a phylogenetic tree is central to evolutionary biology. It is the key to understanding morphology changes among species, inferring ancestral biochemical properties of life, or recovering migration routes in phylogeography. The goal is 2-fold: to reconstruct the character state at the tree root (e.g., the region of origin of some species) and to understand the process of state changes along the tree (e.g., species flow between countries). We deal here with discrete characters, which are "unique," as opposed to sequence characters (nucleotides or amino-acids), where we assume the same model for all the characters (or for large classes of characters with site-dependent models) and thus benefit from multiple information sources. In this framework, we use mathematics and simulations to demonstrate that although each goal can be achieved with high accuracy individually, it is generally impossible to accurately estimate both the root state and the rates of state changes along the tree branches, from the observed data at the tips of the tree. This is because the global rates of state changes along the branches that are optimal for the two estimation tasks have opposite trends, leading to a fundamental trade-off in accuracy. This inherent "Darwinian uncertainty principle" concerning the simultaneous estimation of "patterns" and "processes" governs ancestral reconstructions in biology. For certain tree shapes (typically speciation trees) the uncertainty of simultaneous estimation is reduced when more tips are present; however, for other tree shapes it does not (e.g., coalescent trees used in population genetics).
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ancestral states; Yule and coalescent trees; evolutionary patterns and processes; information theory; phylogeny; transition rates

Year:  2020        PMID: 31432087      PMCID: PMC7188465          DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syz054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  22 in total

1.  Distribution of branch lengths and phylogenetic diversity under homogeneous speciation models.

Authors:  Tanja Stadler; Mike Steel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  An improved general amino acid replacement matrix.

Authors:  Si Quang Le; Olivier Gascuel
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Predicting the ancestral character changes in a tree is typically easier than predicting the root state.

Authors:  Olivier Gascuel; Mike Steel
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Phylogenetic mixtures and linear invariants for equal input models.

Authors:  Marta Casanellas; Mike Steel
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; H Kishino; T Yano
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Virus genomes reveal factors that spread and sustained the Ebola epidemic.

Authors:  Gytis Dudas; Luiz Max Carvalho; Trevor Bedford; Andrew J Tatem; Guy Baele; Nuno R Faria; Daniel J Park; Jason T Ladner; Armando Arias; Danny Asogun; Filip Bielejec; Sarah L Caddy; Matthew Cotten; Jonathan D'Ambrozio; Simon Dellicour; Antonino Di Caro; Joseph W Diclaro; Sophie Duraffour; Michael J Elmore; Lawrence S Fakoli; Ousmane Faye; Merle L Gilbert; Sahr M Gevao; Stephen Gire; Adrianne Gladden-Young; Andreas Gnirke; Augustine Goba; Donald S Grant; Bart L Haagmans; Julian A Hiscox; Umaru Jah; Jeffrey R Kugelman; Di Liu; Jia Lu; Christine M Malboeuf; Suzanne Mate; David A Matthews; Christian B Matranga; Luke W Meredith; James Qu; Joshua Quick; Suzan D Pas; My V T Phan; Georgios Pollakis; Chantal B Reusken; Mariano Sanchez-Lockhart; Stephen F Schaffner; John S Schieffelin; Rachel S Sealfon; Etienne Simon-Loriere; Saskia L Smits; Kilian Stoecker; Lucy Thorne; Ekaete Alice Tobin; Mohamed A Vandi; Simon J Watson; Kendra West; Shannon Whitmer; Michael R Wiley; Sarah M Winnicki; Shirlee Wohl; Roman Wölfel; Nathan L Yozwiak; Kristian G Andersen; Sylvia O Blyden; Fatorma Bolay; Miles W Carroll; Bernice Dahn; Boubacar Diallo; Pierre Formenty; Christophe Fraser; George F Gao; Robert F Garry; Ian Goodfellow; Stephan Günther; Christian T Happi; Edward C Holmes; Brima Kargbo; Sakoba Keïta; Paul Kellam; Marion P G Koopmans; Jens H Kuhn; Nicholas J Loman; N'Faly Magassouba; Dhamari Naidoo; Stuart T Nichol; Tolbert Nyenswah; Gustavo Palacios; Oliver G Pybus; Pardis C Sabeti; Amadou Sall; Ute Ströher; Isatta Wurie; Marc A Suchard; Philippe Lemey; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A counting renaissance: combining stochastic mapping and empirical Bayes to quickly detect amino acid sites under positive selection.

Authors:  Philippe Lemey; Vladimir N Minin; Filip Bielejec; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Marc A Suchard
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  A Fast Likelihood Method to Reconstruct and Visualize Ancestral Scenarios.

Authors:  Sohta A Ishikawa; Anna Zhukova; Wataru Iwasaki; Olivier Gascuel
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  A single evolutionary innovation drives the deep evolution of symbiotic N2-fixation in angiosperms.

Authors:  Gijsbert D A Werner; William K Cornwell; Janet I Sprent; Jens Kattge; E Toby Kiers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Fast Likelihood Method to Reconstruct and Visualize Ancestral Scenarios.

Authors:  Sohta A Ishikawa; Anna Zhukova; Wataru Iwasaki; Olivier Gascuel
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Efficient inference, potential, and limitations of site-specific substitution models.

Authors:  Vadim Puller; Pavel Sagulenko; Richard A Neher
Journal:  Virus Evol       Date:  2020-08-20

Review 3.  On the Use of Phylogeographic Inference to Infer the Dispersal History of Rabies Virus: A Review Study.

Authors:  Kanika D Nahata; Nena Bollen; Mandev S Gill; Maylis Layan; Hervé Bourhy; Simon Dellicour; Guy Baele
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Inferring the number and position of changes in selective regime in a non-equilibrium mutation-selection framework.

Authors:  Andrew M Ritchie; Tristan L Stark; David A Liberles
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.