| Literature DB >> 31431884 |
Nupur Srivastava1, Shilpi Singh2, Amit Chand Gupta2, Karuna Shanker1, Dnyaneshwar U Bawankule2, Suaib Luqman2.
Abstract
Aromatic ginger (Kaempferia galanga L) is native to India and believed to be originated in Burma. Despite substantial uses in a pickle and south-east Asian cuisines, aromatic ginger is chemically less studied than white and red ginger. Multi-directional investigations have been performed to evaluate chemical composition, nutritional values, ameliorative and protective potential of aromatic ginger (Kaempferia galanga) rhizome (KGR). Macro and micro components analysis confirmed that KGR contains protein, fiber, and high amount of essential minerals (potassium, phosphorous, and magnesium) along with appreciable amounts of iron, manganese, zinc, cobalt, and nickel. The anti-proliferative potential of KGR evaluated nine human cell lines. We have evaluated the anti-proliferative potential of hydrodistillate, extract, and key compound isolated from KGR on nine human cancer cell line and also reporting the safety to normal peritoneal macrophage cells. The current study demonstrates the anticancer potential of the KGR on MDA-MB-231 and WRL-68 cells. Very likely, results can be extrapolated to an animal or human system. Ethyl p-methoxy cinnamate (EPMC) was responsible for inhibiting the proliferation action which varied in a tested cell by intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. The present study demonstrates KGR as safe and high energy value medicinal spices with chemo-preventive action, without toxic phytochemicals, and tolerable other anti-nutritional factors.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-nutritional composition; EPMC, Ethyl p-methoxy cinnamate; HPLC-PDA analysis; KGR, Kaempferia galanga rhizome; Medicinal spices; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; TMS, Tetramethylsilane; Zingiberaceae
Year: 2019 PMID: 31431884 PMCID: PMC6579851 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.05.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1HPLC fingerprinting chromatogram showing EPMC content in different extracts of Kaempferia galanga rhizome.
Physicochemical values of the hydro-distillate of K. galanga rhizome.
| Parameters | Values/characteristics |
|---|---|
| Oil yield | 1.30 ± .02% |
| Major metabolites | |
| Colour | Light yellow |
| Smell | Camphoraceous |
| Physical state | Viscous |
| Saponification value | 106.59 ± 2.09 |
| Iodine value | 107.00 ± 2.18 |
| Acid value | 2.24 ± 0.05 |
| Peroxide value | 22 ± 0.49 |
| Optical rotation | −0.7237 D at 21.7 °C |
| Refractive index | 1.55611 at 20 °C |
| Specific gravity | 1.0268 at 25 °C |
Nutritional composition and anti-nutritional factors of Kaempferia rhizome on a dry weight basis.
| Parameter | Content |
|---|---|
| Ash content | 6.35 ± 0.13 |
| Moisture content | 11.08 ± 0.21 |
| Crude fat | 1.66 ± 0.03 |
| Crude protein | 5.92 ± 0.13 |
| Crude fiber | 7.93 ± 0.14 |
| Total carbohydrate | 72.04 ± 1.05 |
| Calorific value (kcal/100 g) | 331.49 ± 8.38 |
| Total phenolics | 12.13 ± 0.94 |
| Saponins | 6.62 ± 0.72 |
| Phytic acid | 66.67 ± 2.35 |
| Alkaloids | 3.30 ± 0.24 |
| Tannins | 1.18 ± 0.01 |
| Oxalate | 30.09 ± 0.70 |
| Total cyanide | ND |
DW-Dry weight.
ND-Not detected.
Comparative data on mineral and metal composition of aromatic ginger of different origin.
| Mineral and metals content in | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Asansol, West Bengal, India | Kelantan, Malaysia | Bangi, Malaysia | Kerala, India | Shuangjiao, Guangdong, China | Chittagong, Bangladesh |
| Sodium | 43.26 ± 0.78 | 6970 ± 100 | 71.50 | 1150 ± 10 | ||
| Potassium | 7500 ± 15 | 5000 ± 200 | 1375.00 | 11050 ± 20 | ||
| Calcium | 137.08 ± 2.46 | 415.40 | 2600 ± 100 | 508.20 | 3000 ± 40 | |
| Magnesium | 520.49 ± 9.27 | 192.00 | 3700 ± 200 | 313.4 | 488.79 | 1350 ± 50 |
| Iron | 55.54 ± 1.16 | 17.43 | 42 ± 12 | 18.90 | 7.83 | 192 ± 4.24 |
| Zinc | 0.88 ± 0.02 | 1.90 | 85 ± 8 | 14.52 | 8.22 | 12 ± 0.00 |
| Manganese | 9.23 ± 0.17 | 1.73 | 79.90 | 63.41 | 68 ± 1.41 | |
| Copper | BDL | 0.792 | 0.72 | 20 ± 1.41 | ||
| Cobalt | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||
| Nickel | 0.31 ± .02 | 0.251 | 0.52 | |||
| Phosphorus | 6400 ± 20 | 3260 ± 20 | ||||
| Aluminum | 24.77 ± 0.043 | |||||
| Chromium | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.761 | 0.17 | |||
| Cadmium | BDL | 0.03 | ||||
| Lead | BDL | 0.48 | ||||
| Arsenic | BDL | |||||
| Mercury | BDL | |||||
| Present study | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | |
Dry weight basis.
Fresh weight basis.
Value converted from reported data (g/100 g, mg/100 g, and %) for uniform data representation.
BDL-Below detection limit; Values presented as Mean ± SD.
Fig. 2Concentration responses of a) methanol extract b) hydro-distillate and c) Compound (EPMC) on proliferation on targeted human cancer cell lines.
Fig. 3Flow cytometry results are showing the ROS production in the J774.1 macrophages upon pretreatment of EPMC. Original recordings of DCF fluorescence intensity reflecting the ROS level. Blue-Normal control, Violet- H2O2 as positive control, and Green- EPMC (5 and 10 μg/mL). Three separate experiments were performed. A representative example has been shown.
Biocompatibility and cell safety of EPMC- a major bioactive of KGR.
| Dose (μg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| KGR-Hydro-distillate | EPMC | ||
| 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 5 | 100.81 ± 4.22 | 98.48 ± 5.26 | 101.04 ± 6.69 |
| 10 | 98.56 ± 4.63 | 98.32 ± 4.93 | 97.20 ± 7.17 |
| 20 | 99.85 ± 7.38 | 97.64 ± 4.87 | 96.51 ± 5.12 |
| 50 | 96.37 ± 6.29 | 97.67 ± 5.63 | 96.85 ± 4.34 |
| 100 | 96.18 ± 5.74 | 97.25 ± 4.39 | 96.73 ± 4.65 |
Peritoneal macrophage cells using MTT assay (detail in material and method section).
KGR-MeOH- K. galanga rhizome methanol extract.