Literature DB >> 31431796

Individual differences in subphonemic sensitivity and phonological skills.

Monica Y C Li1,2,3,4, David Braze2,4, Anuenue Kukona4,5, Clinton L Johns4, Whitney Tabor1,2,4, Julie A Van Dyke2,4, W Einar Mencl4,6, Donald P Shankweiler1,4, Kenneth R Pugh1,2,3,4,6, James S Magnuson1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Many studies have established a link between phonological abilities (indexed by phonological awareness and phonological memory tasks) and typical and atypical reading development. Individuals who perform poorly on phonological assessments have been mostly assumed to have underspecified (or "fuzzy") phonological representations, with typical phonemic categories, but with greater category overlap due to imprecise encoding. An alternative posits that poor readers have overspecified phonological representations, with speech sounds perceived allophonically (phonetically distinct variants of a single phonemic category). On both accounts, mismatch between phonological categories and orthography leads to reading difficulty. Here, we consider the implications of these accounts for online speech processing. We used eye tracking and an individual differences approach to assess sensitivity to subphonemic detail in a community sample of young adults with a wide range of reading-related skills. Subphonemic sensitivity inversely correlated with meta-phonological task performance, consistent with overspecification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye tracking; Individual differences; Phonological skills; Reading ability; Spoken word recognition

Year:  2019        PMID: 31431796      PMCID: PMC6701851          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  74 in total

1.  Precursors of literacy delay among children at genetic risk of dyslexia.

Authors:  A Gallagher; U Frith; M J Snowling
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 8.982

2.  Predicting dyslexia at 8 years of age using neonatal brain responses.

Authors:  D L Molfese
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Family risk of dyslexia is continuous: individual differences in the precursors of reading skill.

Authors:  Margaret J Snowling; Alison Gallagher; Uta Frith
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

4.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.

Authors:  James S Magnuson; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Delphine Dahan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-06

5.  Event-related potentials in newborns with and without familial risk for dyslexia: principal component analysis reveals differences between the groups.

Authors:  T K Guttorm; P H T Leppänen; A Tolvanen; H Lyytinen
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  W Serniclaes; L Sprenger-Charolles; R Carré; J F Demonet
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity.

Authors:  E Paulesu; J F Démonet; F Fazio; E McCrory; V Chanoine; N Brunswick; S F Cappa; G Cossu; M Habib; C D Frith; U Frith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models.

Authors:  M W Harm; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training.

Authors:  P G Simos; J M Fletcher; E Bergman; J I Breier; B R Foorman; E M Castillo; R N Davis; M Fitzgerald; A C Papanicolaou
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction?

Authors:  Franck Ramus
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  2 in total

1.  Allophonic perception of VOT contrasts in Spanish children with dyslexia.

Authors:  Willy Serniclaes; Miguel López-Zamora; Soraya Bordoy; Juan L Luque
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Is that a pibu or a pibo? Children with reading and language deficits show difficulties in learning and overnight consolidation of phonologically similar pseudowords.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Malins; Nicole Landi; Kayleigh Ryherd; Jan C Frijters; James S Magnuson; Jay G Rueckl; Kenneth R Pugh; Rose Sevcik; Robin Morris
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-08-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.