| Literature DB >> 31430960 |
Andrea Ianni1,2, Alessio Di Luca1, Camillo Martino3, Francesca Bennato1, Elettra Marone1, Lisa Grotta1, Angelo Cichelli2, Giuseppe Martino4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementation with dried grape pomace on beef quality. Ten Friesian calves were divided into two groups, a control group that received a standard diet, and an experimental group that was administered the dietary supplementation. At the end of the 75 days of the trial, animals were slaughtered, and meat samples analyzed for physical and chemical properties, fatty acids composition, lipid oxidation, volatile compounds, and biogenic amines. The fatty acid profile resulted affected by dietary supplementation, since an increase in concentration of linoleic acid was observed. Furthermore, a reduction of lipid oxidation was found in the same samples. With reference to volatile compounds a reduction of hexanal and an increase of 2-3 octanedione was evidenced, while no effects were induced by diets on the synthesis of biogenic amines. The grape pomace exploitation as a dietary supplement in bovine diet did not have negative effects on the quality of beef and showed the potential to extend shelf life due to marked improvement in oxidative stability. Overall, the present study showed a viable way for the recovery and the valorization of the main by-product of the oenological industry.Entities:
Keywords: agricultural by-product; biogenic amine; bovine meat; lipid oxidation; polyunsaturated fatty acid; volatile compound
Year: 2019 PMID: 31430960 PMCID: PMC6720490 DOI: 10.3390/ani9080578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Chemical composition of alfalfa hay administered to all animals involved in the study.
| Parameters | % |
|---|---|
| Dry matter (DM) | 87.5 |
| Crude protein † | 16.3 |
| Ash † | 9.1 |
| Ether extract † | 2.6 |
| Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) † | 53.1 |
| Acid detergent fiber (ADF) † | 40.5 |
† Data are reported on a dry matter basis.
Ingredients and chemical composition of the custom-formulated concentrate respectively administered to control group (CG) and experimental group (EG).
| Ingredients (%) | Diet | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CG | EG | ||
| Beet pulp, dried | 11 | 1 | |
| Corn | 8.5 | 8.8 | |
| Grain dust | 15 | 9 | |
| Grape pomace meal | 10 | ||
| Fine bran | 20 | 22 | |
| Sunflower seed | 1.5 | 1.5 | |
| Barley | 30 | 34 | |
| Soybean meal | 4.2 | 4.9 | |
| Molasses | 1 | 1 | |
| Soybean hull | 3.5 | 2.5 | |
| Mineral premix | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
| Commot salt | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 1 | 1 | |
| Vitamin Premix | 1 | 1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dry Matter (DM) | 90.43 | 90.20 | 90.44 |
| Crude protein † | 12.45 | 14.80 | 14.03 |
| Ether extract † | 4.02 | 3.81 | 4.00 |
| Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) † | 38.76 | 20.33 | 18.97 |
| Acid detergent fiber (ADF) † | 37.53 | 7.89 | 8.27 |
| Starch † | nd | 29.01 | 28.69 |
| Ash † | 11.08 | 7.46 | 7.77 |
| TPC ‡ (GAE mg/g) | 15.87 ± 1.33 | nd | 0.24 ± 0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
| C16:0 | 9.97 ± 0.86 | 21.54 ± 1.44 | 19.28 ± 1.55 |
| C18:0 | 2.16 ± 0.22 | 2.36 ± 0.19 | 1.98 ± 0.19 |
| C18:1 | 15.56 ± 1.34 | 19.27 ± 1.60 | 17.55 ± 1.41 |
| C18:2 | 71.59 ± 5.03 | 53.11 ± 2.01 a | 58.31 ± 2.85 b |
| C18:3 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 1.37 ± 0.12 | 1.09 ± 0.11 |
† Data are reported on a dry matter (DM) basis. ‡ Total phenolic compounds (TPC) are reported as Gallic Acid Equivalent (mg/g). § Data are expressed as mean percentage on total fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) ± standard deviation. a,b Means with different superscripts are significantly different by diet (p < 0.05). DGP = dried grape pomace; nd = not detectable.
Physical and chemical evaluations on meat samples obtained from calves fed a standard diet (CG) and calves fed a dietary supplementation of 10% dried grape pomace (EG).
| Diet | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Trait | CG | EG |
|
| Live weight, kg | 328 ± 44 | 350 ± 22 | ns |
| Carcass weight, kg | 183 ± 26 | 196 ± 15 | ns |
| Carcass yield, % | 55.83 ± 0.82 | 55.91 ± 1.23 | ns |
| pH45 | 6.36 ± 0.03 | 6.38 ± 0.08 | ns |
| pH48 | 5.55 ± 0.02 | 5.55 ± 0.06 | ns |
| Drip loss, % | 2.64 ± 1.23 | 3.25 ± 1.57 | ns |
| Cooking loss, % | 22.36 ± 2.90 | 22.40 ± 8.83 | ns |
| L* | 41.89 ± 4.22 | 40.20 ± 4.37 | ns |
| a* | 18.15 ± 2.63 | 17.94 ± 2.55 | ns |
| b* | 12.55 ± 2.51 | 12.64 ± 1.79 | ns |
|
| ns | ||
| Moisture | 74.53 ± 0.98 | 75.11 ± 1.90 | ns |
| Dry matter † (DM) | 25.47 ± 0.98 | 24.89 ± 1.90 | ns |
| Total lipids † | 1.23 ± 0.13 | 1.10 ± 0.09 | ns |
| Ash † | 1.09 ± 0.12 | 0.95 ± 0.91 | ns |
All data are reported as mean ± standard deviation; ns: not significant. pH45: pH 45 min post mortem; pH48: pH 48 h post mortem. L*: lightness; a*: redness; b*: yellowness. † Data are reported on a dry matter basis.
Fatty acid profile of meat samples obtained from animals fed a standard diet (CG) and animals fed a dietary supplementation of 10% dried grape pomace (EG).
| Fatty Acids † | CG | EG |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| C14:0 | 2.37 ± 0.68 | 2.68 ± 0.62 | ns |
| C15:0 | 0.39 ± 0.06 | 0.42 ± 0.06 | ns |
| C16:0 | 26.56 ± 2.59 | 27.53 ± 1.55 | ns |
| C17:0 | 1.24 ± 0.20 | 1.02 ± 0.31 | ns |
| C18:0 | 18.64 ± 0.27 | 16.33 ± 0.20 | ns |
| C22:0 | 1.79 ± 0.57 | 1.75 ± 0.88 | ns |
| SFA | 50.99 ± 3.07 | 49.74 ± 2.06 | ns |
| C14:1 | 0.31 ± 0.15 | 0.33 ± 0.13 | ns |
| C16:1 | 1.98 ± 0.62 | 1.82 ± 0.49 | ns |
| C18:1 | 25.79 ± 1.35 | 26.20 ± 1.48 | ns |
| C18:1 | 1.74 ± 0.35 | 1.55 ± 0.29 | ns |
| C18:1 | 6.64 ± 3.28 | 4.13 ± 2.74 | ns |
| MUFA | 36.45 ± 2.78 | 33.96 ± 3.25 | ns |
| C18:2 | 8.76 ± 1.47 | 13.03 ± 1.98 | * |
| C18:3 | 0.39 ± 0.11 | 0.43 ± 0.24 | ns |
| PUFA | 10.94 ± 1.42 | 15.21 ± 3.01 | ns |
† Data are reported as mean percentage on total FAME ± S.D. ‡ Sum of trans isomers with the exception of the trans-11 reported separately. SFA: saturated fatty acid; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acid. * p < 0.05; ns: not significant.
Volatile compounds (VOCs) detected after 7 days post mortem in beef samples obtained from animals fed a standard diet (CG) and animals fed a dietary supplementation of 10% dried grape pomace (EG).
| VOC † | CG | EG |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| pentanal | 1.91 ± 0.24 | 1.99 ± 0.23 | ns |
| hexanal | 56.24 ± 3.31 | 45.95 ± 4.05 | * |
| heptanal | 2.84 ± 0.38 | 2.97 ± 0.34 | ns |
| octanal | 2.82 ± 0.42 | 2.54 ± 0.36 | ns |
| nonanal | 6.55 ± 0.57 | 7.61 ± 0.82 | ns |
| 2-octenal | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | ns |
| 2-heptanone | 0.30 ± 0.04 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | ns |
| 2,3-octanedione | 8.98 ± 0.91 | 13.20 ± 1.67 | * |
| 1-pentanol | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 1.36 ± 0.16 | ns |
| 1-octen-3-ol | 11.43 ± 1.04 | 15.03 ± 1.79 | ns |
| 2-octen-1-ol | 2.29 ± 0.24 | 2.59 ± 0.17 | ns |
| ethylbenzene | 0.38 ± 0.05 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | ns |
| β-Terpinyl acetate | 2.48 ± 0.34 | 3.23 ± 0.35 | ns |
| benzaldehyde | 1.84 ± 0.19 | 1.92 ± 0.19 | ns |
| furan, 2-pentyl | 0.65 ± 0.08 | 0.58 ± 0.06 | ns |
† Data are reported as mean percentage of (VOCs) ± S.D. * p < 0.05; ns: not significant.