| Literature DB >> 31429506 |
Torsten Thiess1,2, Soren K Mellerup1,2, Holger Braunschweig1,2.
Abstract
A 1,4,2,3-diazadiborinine derivative was found to form Lewis adducts with strong two-electron donors such as N-heterocyclic and cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbenes. Depending on the donor, some of these Lewis pairs are thermally unstable, converting to sole B,N-embedded products upon gentle heating. The products of these reactions, which have been fully characterized by NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction, were identified as B,N-heterocycles with fused 1,5,2,4-diazadiborepine and 1,4,2-diazaborinine rings. Computational modelling of the reaction mechanism provides insight into the formation of these unique structures, suggesting that a series of B-H, C-N, and B-B bond activation steps are responsible for these "intercalation" reactions between the 1,4,2,3-diazadiborinine and NHCs.Entities:
Keywords: B,N-heterocycles; B−B bond activation; NHCs; diazadiborinines; ring-expansion reactions
Year: 2019 PMID: 31429506 PMCID: PMC6856839 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201903259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemistry ISSN: 0947-6539 Impact factor: 5.236
Scheme 1NHC‐ring expanded products from E−H activation (E=Be, B, Al, and Si; top), as well as B−B activation (bottom). Dipp=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl.
Scheme 2Synthesis of carbene‐diazadiborinine adducts 2 a–2 c and the RER products 3 a/3 b. Mes=2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl.
Figure 1Single‐crystal X‐ray crystallographic structures of 2 b and 2 c. Atomic displacement ellipsoids are depicted at 50 % probability and omitted at the ligand periphery. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity, except for those bound to boron. Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°]: for 2 b B2−B1 1.699(2), B1−N1 1.408(2), B2−N2 1.570(2), B2−C1 1.633(2), B1−H1 1.12(2), N1‐B1‐B2 119.0(1), N2‐B2‐B1 110.4(1), N2‐B2‐C1 114.1(1), B1‐B2‐C1 114.6(1), B1‐B2‐C1‐N3 33.5(2); for 2 c: B1−H1 1.18(2), N1−B1 1.419(4), B1−B2 1.678(5), B2−N2 1.434(3), B2−C1 1.599(4), N1‐B1‐B2 117.2(2), B1‐B2‐N2 112.7(2), N2‐B2‐C1 120.1(2), B2‐C1‐N3 112.8(2), N1‐B1‐B2‐N2 2.0(3), B1‐B2‐C1‐N3 −48.5(3), N2‐B2‐C1‐N3 138.0(2).
Figure 2Single‐crystal X‐ray crystallographic structures of 3 a, 3 b, and 4 a. Atomic displacement ellipsoids are depicted at 50 % probability and omitted at the ligand periphery. Most hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°]: for 3 a: N2−B2 1.443(2), B2−N4 1.411(2), N1−B1 1.403(2), B1−C1 1.574(2), C1−B2 1.588(2), C1−N3 1.474(2), B1−H1 1.11(2), N2‐B2‐C1 116.6(1), B2‐C1‐B1 105.36(9), B1‐C1‐N3 116.5(1), N3‐C1‐B2 111.72(9), C1‐B2‐N4 118.9(1), N4‐B2‐N2 124.5(1), C1‐B1‐N1 118.7(1), N2‐B2‐C1‐N3 157.0(1), B1‐C1‐B2‐N4 104.1(1), N1‐B1‐C1‐B2 68.3(1), N1‐B1‐C1‐N3 −167.2(1), N2‐B2‐C1‐B1 −75.5(1), N1‐B1‐C1‐B2 68.3(1), B1‐C1‐B2‐N2 −75.5(1), B2‐C1‐B1‐N1 68.3(1); for 3 b: B1−C1 1.564(4), C1−B2 1.577(4), B2−N4 1.418(4), C1−N3 1.473(3), B1−N1 1.410(3), N2−B2 1.446(3), N2‐B2‐C1 116.9(2), B2‐C1‐B1 106.3(2), B2‐C1‐N3 113.5(2), N3‐C1‐B1 114.1(2), C1‐B2‐N4 120.1(2), N4‐B2‐N2 123.0(2), N1‐B1‐C1 120.1(2), N2‐B2‐C1‐B1 −71.2(3), B2‐C1‐B1‐N1 68.0(3), N1‐B1‐C1‐N3 −166.1(2), B1‐C1‐B2‐N4 109.7(3), N2‐B2‐C1‐N3 162.6(2); for 4 a: N1−B1 1.539(3), B1−C1 1.648(4), C1−B2 1.577(4), B2−N2 1.443(4), B2−N4 1.426(3), C1−N3 1.494(4), B1−C2 1.641(3), N1‐B1‐C1 112.8(2), N1‐B1‐C2 115.6(2), C2‐B1‐C1 107.4(2), N2‐B2‐C1 119.7(2), N2‐B2‐N4 120.7(2), N4‐B2‐C1 119.6(2), B2‐C1‐N3 113.3(2), N3‐C1‐B1 107.7(2), N1‐B1‐C1‐B2 64.6(3), N1‐B1‐C1‐B2 64.6(3), N1‐B1‐C1‐N3 −167.9(2), B1‐C1‐B2‐N2 −67.7(3), B1‐C1‐B2‐N4 112.3(3), N2‐B2‐C1‐N3 167.8(2), N1‐B1‐C2‐N5 140.9(3), N6‐C2‐B1‐C1 83.1(3).
Scheme 3Reaction between 3 a/3 b and NHCMe.
Figure 3Calculated (DFT) reaction pathways for the reaction of 1 with NHCMe (red) and NHCMes (blue) at the PBEPBE/def2‐SVP level of theory.