Literature DB >> 31429165

Less Pain Relief, More Depression, and Female Sex Correlate With Spinal Cord Stimulation Explants.

Julia Slyer1, Samae Scott1, Breanna Sheldon1, Maria Hancu2, Cheyanne Bridger1, Julie G Pilitsis1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a known therapy for a variety of chronic pain conditions, but over time a number of patients proceed to explants.
OBJECTIVES: We compared explant rates based on degree of pain relief, diagnosis, lead location, gender, and age to determine possible predictors for SCS implant success.
METHODS: First, we performed a single-center retrospective chart review of consecutive SCS-implanted subjects was to document internal explant rates. Rates of explants based on diagnosis, gender, age, and lead location were compared to determine potential trends. We then examined which thoracic SCS patients in our prospectively collected outcome measures data base who were explanted.
RESULTS: A total of 63 of 671 thoracic SCS were explanted. Thoracic explants occurred in patients who were significantly younger (p = 0.03). Women who were explanted reported significantly more discomfort from the device (p = 0.05). When we looked at our data base of patients with a mean time implanted of 2.77 years and a minimum of one year follow-up, 11 of 114 thoracic SCS patients were explanted. All explants were women. There was no correlation with diagnosis or age. Those who were explanted reported more pain (p = 0.03) and depression (p < 0.01) at one year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data correlates explants with less pain relief and more depression. Women are more likely to have explants than men. The role of physiologic and psychosocial variables leading to this difference has yet to be elucidated.
© 2019 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; explant rate; explantation; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31429165     DOI: 10.1111/ner.13036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  4 in total

1.  Development of Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Treatment Response to Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Amir Hadanny; Tessa Harland; Olga Khazen; Marisa DiMarzio; Anthony Marchese; Ilknur Telkes; Vishad Sukul; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Treatment Strategies for Generator Pocket Pain.

Authors:  Jonathan Bao; Olga Khazen; Zachary T Olmsted; Guy Gechtman; Miriam M Shao; Marisa DiMarzio; Gregory Topp; Vishad V Sukul; Michael D Staudt; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Sex-specific differences in the efficacy of traditional low frequency versus high frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain.

Authors:  Rosalynn R Z Conic; Jacob Caylor; Christina L Cui; Zabrina Reyes; Eric Nelson; Sopyda Yin; Imanuel Lerman
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2022-04-28

4.  Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience.

Authors:  Gernot Surges; Joachim Paulus; Theresa Blaß; Kerstin Mendryscha; Martin Bettag; Anand Rotte
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-07-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.