Literature DB >> 31429033

No Perfect Method: Exploring How Past Contraceptive Methods Influence Current Attitudes Toward Intrauterine Devices.

Anu Manchikanti Gomez1, Stephanie Arteaga2, Natasha Aronson2, Molly Goodkind2, Livia Houston2, Erica West2.   

Abstract

Little research on contraceptive decision-making takes a holistic perspective to understand women's contraceptive journeys throughout the reproductive life course. This analysis investigated how Black and Latina women's past experiences with contraceptive use and acquisition impact their feelings and attitudes toward future use of intrauterine devices (IUDs). We utilized data from in-depth interviews that explored contraceptive decision-making and knowledge of, interest in, and attitudes toward IUDs among 38 young Black and Latina women collected in 2013 in the San Francisco Bay Area. Here, we focused on the IUD decision-making process among a subsample of 32 women who were not using or had not previously used an IUD. Overall, we found a strong link between past contraceptive experiences and attitudes regarding future use of IUDs. Notably, participants often referenced experiences of side effects with previous methods when explaining their interest-or lack thereof-in IUD use, as well as made links between contraceptive attributes they had experienced positively and attributes of the IUD. A minority of participants described being satisfied with their current method, resulting in a lack of interest in considering IUD use. More than half of participants described distrust, either in healthcare providers owing to previous negative interactions and contraceptive failures of provider-recommended methods or owing to family members' and friends' negative experiences with IUDs. This distrust undergirded their lack of interest in the IUD. These findings highlight the importance of locating contraceptive decision-making in the broader context of reproductive journeys.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraceptive decision-making; Contraceptive side effects; Family planning; Patient–provider interactions; Provider distrust

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31429033     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-019-1424-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  5 in total

1.  "I talked to a couple of friends that had it": Informal feminized health networks and contraceptive method choices.

Authors:  Cristen Dalessandro; Rachael Thorpe; Jessica Sanders
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Structural Inequity and Pregnancy Desires in Emerging Adulthood.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Stephanie Arteaga; Bridget Freihart
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-01-28

3.  Barriers to post-placental intrauterine device receipt among expectant minority women.

Authors:  Lydia Furman; Shannon Pettit; Monique S Balthazar; Khalilah Williams; Mary Ann O'Riordan
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 1.752

4.  "Since I'm a little bit more mature": contraception and the arc of time for women in midlife.

Authors:  Amy Alspaugh; Melody D Reibel; Eun-Ok Im; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Womens Midlife Health       Date:  2021-04-09

5.  "When Is Health Care Actually Going to Be Care?" The Lived Experience of Family Planning Care Among Young Black Women.

Authors:  Rachel G Logan; Ellen M Daley; Cheryl A Vamos; Adetola Louis-Jacques; Stephanie L Marhefka
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2021-02-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.