| Literature DB >> 31426578 |
Annemijn P A Wierenga1, Gülçin Gezgin1, Els van Beelen2, Michael Eikmans2, Marijke Spruyt-Gerritse2, Niels J Brouwer1, Mieke Versluis1, Robert M Verdijk3,4, Sjoerd G van Duinen3, Marina Marinkovic1, Gregorius P M Luyten1, Martine J Jager5.
Abstract
A high HLA expression in uveal melanoma (UM) is part of the prognostically unfavorable inflammatory phenotype. We wondered whether the presence of soluble HLA (sHLA) in the aqueous humour is associated with clinical, histopathological or genetic tumour characteristics, and represents tumour HLA expression and intratumoural inflammation. Aqueous humour from 108 UM patients was analysed for the presence of sHLA, using a Luminex assay specific for HLA Class I. Clinical and genetic parameters were compared between sHLA-positive and negative eyes. A qPCR analysis was performed on tumour tissue using a Fluidigm assay. In 19/108 UM-containing eyes, the sHLA level in the aqueous was above the detection limit. Tumours in sHLA-positive eyes were significantly larger, more frequently involved the ciliary body, and more often showed monosomy 3, gain of chromosome 8q and loss of BAP1 staining. Melanoma-related survival was worse in patients with sHLA-positive aqueous humour. sHLA in the aqueous did not represent the tumour's HLA expression and did not relate to immune cell infiltration in the tumour. We conclude that UM-containing eyes may contain sHLA in the aqueous humour, where it is a prognostically-unfavourable sign and may influence local immune responses.Entities:
Keywords: aqueous humour; immunotherapy; infiltrate; liquid biopsies; soluble HLA; uveal melanoma
Year: 2019 PMID: 31426578 PMCID: PMC6721510 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11081202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Characteristics of patients with a uveal melanoma (UM) that underwent enucleation in the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) between 1999 and 2016 (n = 108), categorised as soluble HLA (sHLA) negative or sHLA positive, based on the level of sHLA in the aqueous humour.
| Clinical and Histopathologic Characteristics | Patients, | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| sHLA Negative ( | sHLA Positive ( | ||
|
| 0.09 b | ||
| Female | 33 (37) | 11 (58) | |
| Male | 56 (63) | 8 (42) | |
|
| 0.69 d | ||
| No | 86 (97) | 18 (95) | |
| Yes | 3 (3) | 1 (5) | |
|
| 0.28 b | ||
| OD | 52 (58) | 7 (37) | |
| OS | 37 (42) | 12 (63) | |
|
| 0.46 e | ||
| in years, mean (±S.D.) | 59 (±14) | 63 (±16) | |
|
| 0.056 b | ||
| Light | 49 (88) | 10 (67) | |
| Dark | 7 (12) | 5 (33) | |
|
| 0.40 e | ||
| in mm, mean (±S.D.) (known in 107 cases) | 12.3 (±3.1) | 13.1 (±3.1) | |
|
| <0.001 e,* | ||
| in mm, mean (±S.D.) (known in 107 cases) | 7.0 (±2.9) | 9.8 (±2.2) | |
|
| <0.001 b,* | ||
| No | 64 (72) | 5 (26) | |
| Yes | 25 (28) | 14 (74) | |
|
| 0.44 e | ||
| mean (±S.D.) | 4.7 (±3.3) | 6.4 (±7.1) | |
|
| 0.064 b | ||
| Spindle cell | 28 (32) | 2 (11) | |
| Epithelioid or mixed cell type | 61 (69) | 17 (89) | |
|
| 0.076 d | ||
| Unclear | 10 (12) | 5 (26) | |
| Intact | 21 (25) | 1 (5) | |
| Broken | 53 (62) | 13 (68) | |
|
| <0.001 d,* | ||
| I | 11 (14) | 0 (0) | |
| IIA | 29 (36) | 0 (0) | |
| IIB | 23 (29) | 6 (40) | |
| IIIA, IIIB, IIIC | 17 (21) | 8 (53) | |
| IV | 0 (0) | 1 (7) | |
|
| 0.034 b,* | ||
| D3 | 37 (44) | 3 (17) | |
| M3 | 48 (57) | 15 (83) | |
|
| 0.003 b,* | ||
| No gain of 8q | 35 (45) | 1 (6) | |
| Gain of 8q | 43 (55) | 16 (94) | |
|
| 0.98 b | ||
| No gain of 6p | 31 (46) | 7 (37) | |
| Gain of 6p | 36 (54) | 8 (42) | |
|
| 0.036 b,* | ||
| Normal | 29 (37) | 2 (11) | |
| Absent | 50 (63) | 16 (89) | |
|
| 0.029 b,* | ||
| Absent | 52 (59) | 6 (32) | |
| Present | 36 (41) | 13 (68) | |
|
| 0.36 d | ||
| Dead due to UM metastases | 34 (38) | 11 (58) | |
| Average follow-up time, months | 50 | 27 | |
| Dead due to other cause | 19 (21) | 0 (0) | |
| Alive at last follow-up date | 36 (40) | 8 (42) | |
* Test is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Significant p values are shown in bold. a Percentages are rounded and may not total 100; b Pearson χ2 test; c light eye colours: blue, grey, green, hazel—dark eye colour: brown; d linear-by-linear association; e Mann–Whitney U Test; f number of mitoses per mm2 with 40× magnification, in eight high power fields.
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier survival curve showing melanoma-related survival, since enucleation, based on the sHLA expression in the aqueous humour of 108 UM patients. Curves represent the negative and positive sHLA groups. Both groups differ significantly in survival (Log Rank test p = 0.025).
Expression of different HLA- and infiltrate-related markers. Presence or absence of soluble HLA (sHLA) in the aqueous humor of UM-containing eyes compared to the expression of HLA and infiltrate related markers as determined by qPCR on primary uveal melanoma-tissue. The median is displayed, with the 95% bootstrap Confidence Intervals (CI).
| sHLA | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluidigm Marker | Negative (Median, 95% CI) | Positive (Median, 95% CI) | |
| HLA-A, | 431 (218–834) | 1264 (172–2162) | 0.07 |
| HLA-B, | 123,245 (81,117–266,604) | 205,282 (55,537–1,062,673) | 0.46 |
| β2M, | 373,244 (226,274–566,287) | 416,625 (22,3013–1,391,012) | 0.60 |
| CD40, | 670 (451–1454) | 516 (372–869) | 0.38 |
| CD8a, | 34 (18–147) | 182 (15–1027) | 0.73 |
| CD4, | 274 (163–347) | 188 (95–380) | 0.52 |
| CD3e, | 116 (79–213) | 221 (43–1212) | 0.78 |
| CD163, | 1023 (509–2000) | 839 (484–2404) | 0.52 |
| CD68, | 4934 (2989–9072) | 5473 (2000–25,873) | 1.00 |
§ Mann–Whitney U test; * test is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis on important prognostic tumour characteristics and sHLA expression in the aqueous humour of UM eyes (n = 108). B stands for the unstandardised regression coefficient and Beta (β) is the standardised regression coefficient. The β indicates the effect that a change to the standard deviation (SD) of the independent variable has on the dependent variable.
| sHLA | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | B (95% CI) | Beta (β) | |
|
| |||
| Chromosome 3 status ( | 0.17 (0.01–0.31) | 0.21 | 0.034 * |
| Involvement of ciliary body ( | 2.87 (−0.43–−0.14) | −0.36 | <0.001 * |
| Tumour prominence ( | 0.045 (0.02–0.07) | 0.36 | <0.001 * |
|
| |||
| Model 1 | |||
| Chromosome 3 status | 0.097 (−0.53–0.25) | 0.13 | 0.20 |
| Involvement of ciliary body | −0.24 (−0.39–−0.86) | −0.30 | 0.002 * |
| Model 2 | |||
| Tumour prominence | 0.035 (0.01–0.06) | 0.27 | 0.003 * |
| Involvement of ciliary body | −0.233 (−0.38–−0.09) | −0.29 | 0.002 * |
| Model 3 | |||
| Chromosome 3 status | 0.44 (0.02–0.07) | 0.197 | 0.035 * |
| Tumour prominence | 0.15 (0.01–0.30) | 0.348 | <0.001 * |
| Model 4 | |||
| Chromosome 3 status | 0.10 (−0.46–0.25) | 0.13 | 0.17 |
| Tumour prominence | 0.04 (0.01–0.06) | 0.28 | 0.003 * |
| Involvement of ciliary body | −0.18 (−0.34–−0.03) | −0.23 | 0.021 * |
* Significant p-values are shown in bold.