PURPOSE: In uveal melanoma, different predictors of poor prognosis have been identified, including monosomy of chromosome 3, HLA expression, and the presence of infiltrating leukocytes and macrophages. Each of these parameters can be used to differentiate prognostically the favorable tumors from the unfavorable ones, and thus the hypothesis for the present study was that they are related, and that monosomy of chromosome 3 occurs in the same tumors as the unfavorable inflammatory phenotype. METHODS: Tumor tissue was obtained from 50 cases of uveal melanoma treated between 1999 and 2004. After enucleation, nuclei were isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue for fluorescence in situ hybridization, to determine the chromosome 3 copy number. Each tumor-containing globe was further processed for conventional histopathologic examination and for immunohistochemical analysis with HLA class I and II-specific antibodies and with macrophage marker CD68. RESULTS: Of 50 uveal melanomas, 62% (31/50) were categorized as having monosomy of chromosome 3. Monosomy 3 was associated with the presence of epithelioid cells, an increased density of tumor-infiltrating macrophages, and a higher HLA class I and II expression. Survival analyses showed a correlation between monosomy 3 and decreased survival and identified monosomy 3, ciliary body involvement, and largest basal tumor diameter as the best prognostic markers. CONCLUSIONS: Monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma is associated with the presence of an inflammatory phenotype, consisting of a high HLA class I and II expression as well as an increased number of tumor-infiltrating macrophages. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the presence of monosomy 3 was one of the best prognostic markers of metastatic disease and survival, although the follow-up time was short.
PURPOSE: In uveal melanoma, different predictors of poor prognosis have been identified, including monosomy of chromosome 3, HLA expression, and the presence of infiltrating leukocytes and macrophages. Each of these parameters can be used to differentiate prognostically the favorable tumors from the unfavorable ones, and thus the hypothesis for the present study was that they are related, and that monosomy of chromosome 3 occurs in the same tumors as the unfavorable inflammatory phenotype. METHODS:Tumor tissue was obtained from 50 cases of uveal melanoma treated between 1999 and 2004. After enucleation, nuclei were isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue for fluorescence in situ hybridization, to determine the chromosome 3 copy number. Each tumor-containing globe was further processed for conventional histopathologic examination and for immunohistochemical analysis with HLA class I and II-specific antibodies and with macrophage marker CD68. RESULTS: Of 50 uveal melanomas, 62% (31/50) were categorized as having monosomy of chromosome 3. Monosomy 3 was associated with the presence of epithelioid cells, an increased density of tumor-infiltrating macrophages, and a higher HLA class I and II expression. Survival analyses showed a correlation between monosomy 3 and decreased survival and identified monosomy 3, ciliary body involvement, and largest basal tumor diameter as the best prognostic markers. CONCLUSIONS: Monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma is associated with the presence of an inflammatory phenotype, consisting of a high HLA class I and II expression as well as an increased number of tumor-infiltrating macrophages. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the presence of monosomy 3 was one of the best prognostic markers of metastatic disease and survival, although the follow-up time was short.
Authors: Long V Ly; Inge H G Bronkhorst; Els van Beelen; Johannes Vrolijk; Andrew W Taylor; Mieke Versluis; Gregorius P M Luyten; Martine J Jager Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Gülçin Gezgin; Sietse J Luk; Jinfeng Cao; Mehmet Dogrusöz; Dirk M van der Steen; Renate S Hagedoorn; Daniëlle Krijgsman; Pieter A van der Velden; Matthew G Field; Gregorius P M Luyten; Karoly Szuhai; J William Harbour; Ekaterina S Jordanova; Mirjam H M Heemskerk; Martine J Jager Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Jason J Luke; Pierre L Triozzi; Kyle C McKenna; Erwin G Van Meir; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Boris C Bastian; J Silvio Gutkind; Anne M Bowcock; Howard Z Streicher; Poulam M Patel; Takami Sato; Jeffery A Sossman; Mario Sznol; Jack Welch; Magdalena Thurin; Sara Selig; Keith T Flaherty; Richard D Carvajal Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 4.693
Authors: T Huibertus van Essen; Sake I van Pelt; Mieke Versluis; Inge H G Bronkhorst; Sjoerd G van Duinen; Marina Marinkovic; Wilma G M Kroes; Claudia A L Ruivenkamp; Shruti Shukla; Annelies de Klein; Emine Kiliç; J William Harbour; Gregorius P M Luyten; Pieter A van der Velden; Rob M Verdijk; Martine J Jager Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Eszter Szalai; Yi Jiang; Natasha M van Poppelen; Martine J Jager; Annelies de Klein; Emine Kilic; Hans E Grossniklaus Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 7.389