See Hyung Kim1. 1. Departmet of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Korea. kimseehyung72@outlook.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the diagnostic values of vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS) score for detecting muscle-invasive bladder tumors. METHODS: This study included 297 consecutive patients with 339 tumors who previously diagnosed and subsequently underwent multiparametric MR imaging between January 2015 and March 2019. Two radiologists assessed the scores of muscle-invasive tumors using cutoff values of ≥ 4 and ≥ 3. Cutoff values for VI-RADS scores were estimated from the best operating points of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses using the Youden J statistic. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated to assess the utility of VI-RADS for diagnosing muscle-invasive tumors. RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement was excellent for three different MR imaging type at lesion level (k = 0.89 for T2W, k = 0.82 for DW, and k = 0.85 for DCE). At a cutoff value of 4, T2W and DW imaging had a diagnostic accuracy of 79.3% (269/339) for tumor lesions with muscle invasion, which was similar to an overall score of 80.2% (272/339). The overall VI-RAD score showed 80.2% accuracy (272/339), with a cutoff value of ≥ 4, yielding 91.3% sensitivity (85/93), 76.0% specificity (187/246), 83.3% PPV (85/102), and 78.9% NPV (187/237). When we considered an arbitrary overall score of ≥ 3 as the cutoff value, the accuracy was 63.7% (216/339); sensitivity, 94.6% (125/132); specificity, 43.9% (91/207); PPV, 51.6% (125/242); and NPV, 63.7% (91/97). CONCLUSION: VI-RADS has an overall good performance in the diagnosis of muscle-invasive tumors.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the diagnostic values of vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS) score for detecting muscle-invasive bladder tumors. METHODS: This study included 297 consecutive patients with 339 tumors who previously diagnosed and subsequently underwent multiparametric MR imaging between January 2015 and March 2019. Two radiologists assessed the scores of muscle-invasive tumors using cutoff values of ≥ 4 and ≥ 3. Cutoff values for VI-RADS scores were estimated from the best operating points of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses using the Youden J statistic. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated to assess the utility of VI-RADS for diagnosing muscle-invasive tumors. RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement was excellent for three different MR imaging type at lesion level (k = 0.89 for T2W, k = 0.82 for DW, and k = 0.85 for DCE). At a cutoff value of 4, T2W and DW imaging had a diagnostic accuracy of 79.3% (269/339) for tumor lesions with muscle invasion, which was similar to an overall score of 80.2% (272/339). The overall VI-RAD score showed 80.2% accuracy (272/339), with a cutoff value of ≥ 4, yielding 91.3% sensitivity (85/93), 76.0% specificity (187/246), 83.3% PPV (85/102), and 78.9% NPV (187/237). When we considered an arbitrary overall score of ≥ 3 as the cutoff value, the accuracy was 63.7% (216/339); sensitivity, 94.6% (125/132); specificity, 43.9% (91/207); PPV, 51.6% (125/242); and NPV, 63.7% (91/97). CONCLUSION: VI-RADS has an overall good performance in the diagnosis of muscle-invasive tumors.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bladder tumor; Data system (VI-RADS); Multiparametric MRI; Vesical imaging reporting
Authors: Sungmin Woo; Valeria Panebianco; Yoshifumi Narumi; Francesco Del Giudice; Valdair F Muglia; Mitsuru Takeuchi; Soleen Ghafoor; Bernard H Bochner; Alvin C Goh; Hedvig Hricak; James W F Catto; Hebert Alberto Vargas Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Date: 2020-03-19
Authors: Thaisa Gvozdenovic Medina Bricio; Gabriel Lion Gouvea; Rafael Vasconcelos Barros; Fernando Chahud; Jorge Elias; Rodolfo B Reis; Valdair F Muglia Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 5.605
Authors: Adham Hijab; Boris Tocco; Ian Hanson; Hanneke Meijer; Christina Junker Nyborg; Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen; Robert Jan Smeenk; Gillian Smith; Jeff Michalski; Brian C Baumann; Shaista Hafeez Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Marco Bicchetti; Giuseppe Simone; Gianluca Giannarini; Rossano Girometti; Alberto Briganti; Eugenio Brunocilla; Gianpiero Cardone; Francesco De Cobelli; Caterina Gaudiano; Francesco Del Giudice; Simone Flammia; Costantino Leonardo; Martina Pecoraro; Riccardo Schiavina; Carlo Catalano; Valeria Panebianco Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 6.313