| Literature DB >> 31421682 |
Tingting He1,2, Yifei Sun3, Yingchun Zhang4, Shigang Zhao1, Yanjun Zheng1, Guimin Hao5, Yuhua Shi6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine metabolic disorders characterized by hyperandrogenism, polycystic ovaries and ovulatory dysfunction. Several studies have reported that the aberrant expression of miRNAs contributes a lot to disordered folliculogenesis in PCOS, though the role and underlying mechanism of microRNA-200b (miR-200b) and microRNA-200c (miR-200c) in the development of PCOS remain unclear.Entities:
Keywords: PTEN; Polycystic ovary syndrome; Proliferation; microRNA-200b; microRNA-200c
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31421682 PMCID: PMC6698342 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-019-0505-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Clinical and endocrine parameters of PCOS patients and controls
| Basic parameters | PCOS ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 28.30 ± 3.01 | 28.65 ± 2.42 | NS |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.40 ± 3.62 | 21.75 ± 2.45 | < 0.001 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 5.41 ± 0.44 | 5.17 ± 0.43 | < 0.001 |
| FINS (mIU/L) | 15.31 ± 7.79 | 7.87 ± 1.94 | < 0.001 |
| LH (IU/L) | 8.29 ± 3.80 | 4.95 ± 1.43 | < 0.001 |
| FSH (U/L) | 5.88 ± 1.05 | 6.48 ± 1.09 | < 0.001 |
| T (ng/dL) | 39.02 ± 15.69 | 22.63 ± 7.48 | < 0.001 |
| AMH (ng/ml) | 9.28 ± 4.22 | 4.05 ± 1.83 | < 0.001 |
| AFC (mmol/l) | 26.10 ± 8.87 | 13.02 ± 3.52 | < 0.001 |
Data were presented as mean ± SD
Primer sequences for qRT-PCR
| Primer Sequences | |
|---|---|
| microRNA-200b-3p | 5’GCTAATACTGCCTGGTAATGATGA3’ |
| microRNA-200c-3p | 5’CTAATACTGCCGGGTAATGATGGA3’ |
| U6 | F: 5’GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT3’ |
| R: 5’CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT3’ | |
| PTEN | F: 5’TGGATTCGACTTAGACTTGACCT3’ |
| R: 5’GGTGGGTTATGGTCTTCAAAAGG3’ | |
| ACTIN | F: 5’TTCGAGCAAGAGATGGCCA3’ |
| R: 5’CGTACAGGTCTTTGCGGAT3’ |
Fig. 1The expression of miR-200b was significantly increased in GCs of PCOS patients. The expression level was detected by qRT-PCR and normalized against U6. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-test. Logistic regression was used to adjust age and BMI to avoid their potential effects on the expression of miR-200b. Data were shown as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05
Fig. 2Over-expression of miR-200b and miR-200c inhibited KGN cells proliferation. (a) and (b) The expression levels of miR-200b and miR-200c in KGN cells after transfection with miR-200b or miR-200c mimics. The expression level was detected by qRT-PCR and normalized against U6 (n = 3). (c) and (d) The proliferation ability of KGN cells transfected with miR-200b or miR-200c mimics was determined by CCK-8 assays (n = 6). The results were representative of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-test. Data were shown as the mean ± SD. ***P < 0.001
Fig. 3PTEN was a direct target of miR-200b and miR-200c in KGN cells. (a) and (c) Schematic diagram of the reporter constructs containing the predicted miR-200b and miR-200c binding sites in the 3’UTR of PTEN. (b) and (d) The luciferase activity was significantly decreased in HEK293T cells by co-transfecting miR-200b or miR-200c mimics with PTEN WT 3’UTR, while there was no change with PTEN MUT 3’UTR (n = 6). (e) and (f) The mRNA and protein levels of PTEN after miR-200b mimics transfection (n = 3). (g) and (h) The mRNA and protein levels of PTEN after miR-200b inhibitor transfection (n = 3). (i) and (j) The protein levels of PTEN after miR-200c mimics or inhibitor transfection (n = 3). The results were representative of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-test. Data were shown as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; ***P < 0.001
Fig. 4Down-regulation of PTEN suppressed KGN cells proliferation. (a) and (b) The mRNA and protein levels of PTEN in KGN cells after si-PTEN transfection (n = 3). (c) The CCK-8 assay was performed to measure KGN cells proliferation after si-PTEN transfection (n = 6). The results were representative of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-test. Data were shown as the mean ± SD.***P < 0.001