Literature DB >> 31418312

The reliability and validity of the bar-mounted PUSH BandTM 2.0 during bench press with moderate and heavy loads.

Jason Lake1, Simon Augustus1, Kieran Austin1, Paul Comfort2, John McMahon2, Peter Mundy3, G Gregory Haff2,4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the bar-mounted PUSH BandTM 2.0 to determine peak and mean velocity during the bench press exercise with a moderate (60% one repetition maximum [1RM]) and heavy (90% 1RM) load. We did this by simultaneously recording peak and mean velocity using the PUSH BandTM 2.0 and three-dimensional motion capture from participants bench pressing with 60% and 90% 1RM. We used ordinary least products regression to assess within-session reliability and whether the PUSH BandTM 2.0 could accurately predict motion capture velocity. Results showed that PUSH BandTM 2.0 and motion capture peak and mean velocity reliability was acceptable with both loads. While there was a tendency for the PUSH BandTM 2.0 to slightly overestimate peak and mean velocity, there was no fixed bias. However, mean velocity with 60 and 90% 1RM demonstrated proportional bias (differences between predicted and motion capture values increase with magnitude). Therefore, PUSH BandTM 2.0 peak velocity with 60 and 90% 1RM is valid, but mean velocity is not.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; athlete monitoring; method comparison; resistance exercise; velocity-based training

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31418312     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1656703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  7 in total

1.  The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonathon Weakley; Matthew Morrison; Amador García-Ramos; Rich Johnston; Lachlan James; Michael H Cole
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump.

Authors:  Raynier Montoro-Bombú; Lázaro de la Paz Arencibia; Carlo Buzzichelli; Paulo Miranda-Oliveira; Orlando Fernandes; Amândio Santos; Luis Rama
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  The Reliability and Validity of Current Technologies for Measuring Barbell Velocity in the Free-Weight Back Squat and Power Clean.

Authors:  Steve W Thompson; David Rogerson; Harry F Dorrell; Alan Ruddock; Andrew Barnes
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-30

4.  Video-Based System for Automatic Measurement of Barbell Velocity in Back Squat.

Authors:  Basilio Pueo; Jose J Lopez; Jose M Mossi; Adrian Colomer; Jose M Jimenez-Olmedo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Validity and Reliability of the Inertial Measurement Unit for Barbell Velocity Assessments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Filipe Manuel Clemente; Zeki Akyildiz; José Pino-Ortega; Markel Rico-González
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Autoregulation in Resistance Training: Addressing the Inconsistencies.

Authors:  Leon Greig; Ben Hayden Stephens Hemingway; Rodrigo R Aspe; Kay Cooper; Paul Comfort; Paul A Swinton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  The Implementation of Velocity-Based Training Paradigm for Team Sports: Framework, Technologies, Practical Recommendations and Challenges.

Authors:  Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández; Lorena Torres-Ronda
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.