Literature DB >> 3141754

Influenza vaccination in Australia: a review of the economic evidence for policy recommendations.

D B Evans1, M J Hensley, S J O'Connor.   

Abstract

The National Health and Medical Research Council recommends that persons who are believed to be at a higher risk of the complications and of dying of influenza should receive annual vaccinations against the disease. The Council refers specifically to persons who are over the age of 65 years and to those with chronic medical conditions. Recommendations such as these place demands on scarce health resources and it is important to determine if such policies result in the efficient utilization of resources. Accordingly, this article reviews the evidence on the economic efficiency of different vaccination strategies. Two major conclusions emerge. First, even allowing for variability in vaccine effectiveness due to viral antigenic drift, influenza-vaccination programmes, in general, are more cost-effective than are many other interventions that are undertaken as a routine in Australia. Secondly, vaccinating healthy persons who are 45 years of age to 64 years of age is more cost-effective than is vaccinating persons in some of the high-risk groups. Thus, there is likely to be a case for reconsidering whether healthy persons who are younger than 65 years of age also should be included in the official recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3141754     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb120763.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomics of influenza vaccination in the elderly: reviewing the available evidence.

Authors:  M J Postma; R M Baltussen; M L Heijnen; L T de Berg; J C Jager
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Economic evaluation of influenza vaccination and economic modelling. Can results be pooled?

Authors:  T Jefferson; V Demicheli
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Influenza vaccines. A reappraisal of their use.

Authors:  A M Palache
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Implementing the Dutch College of General Practitioner's guidelines for influenza vaccination: an intervention study.

Authors:  G A van Essen; M M Kuyvenhoven; R A de Melker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Efficacy of influenza vaccine among elderly patients by physical activity status.

Authors:  Yuichi Hara; Akihito Hagihara; Hideyuki Ikematu; Koichi Nobutomo
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Evaluation of a simple office-based strategy for increasing influenza vaccine administration and the effect of differing reimbursement plans on the patient acceptance rate.

Authors:  P A Merkel; G C Caputo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.