Literature DB >> 31416364

Dual-target anti-Alzheimer's disease agents with both iron ion chelating and monoamine oxidase-B inhibitory activity.

Zhisheng Mi1, Bing Gan1,2, Sihang Yu3, Jianan Guo1, Changjun Zhang1, Xiaoying Jiang1, Tao Zhou4, Jing Su4, Renren Bai1, Yuanyuan Xie1,5.   

Abstract

MAO-B leads to an increase in the levels of hydrogen peroxide and oxidative free radicals, which contribute to the aetiology of the AD. Thus, both iron ion chelators and MAO-B inhibitors can be used to treat AD. Taking the coumarin derivatives and hydroxypyridinones as the lead compounds, a series of dual-target hybrids were designed and synthesised by Click Chemistry. The compounds were biologically evaluated for their iron ion chelating and MAO-B inhibitory activity. Most of the compounds displayed excellent iron ion chelating activity and moderate to good anti-MAO-B activity. Compounds 27b and 27j exhibited the most potent MAO-B inhibitory activity, with IC50 values of 0.68 and 0.86 μM, respectively. In summary, these dual-target compounds have the potential anti-AD activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; MAO-B; coumarin derivatives; hydroxypyridinone; iron ion chelation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31416364      PMCID: PMC6713216          DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2019.1634703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem        ISSN: 1475-6366            Impact factor:   5.051


Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a degenerative brain disease and the most common cause of dementia. In AD, nerve cells in parts of the brain involved in cognitive function are damaged or destroyed, leading to difficulties in memory, language, problem-solving and other cognitive skills. People in the final stages of the disease are bed-bound and require around-the-clock care. Metal ions are involved in several essential functions in the nervous system. For instance, iron ion is required to support the brain’s high respiratory rate as well as for myelination, gene expression and synthesis of neurotransmitters. Furthermore, iron ion is involved in the pathophysiology of AD. Iron ion is usually accumulated in the nervous system of patients with neurodegenerative diseases. 2-amido-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one, a chelating pharmacophore, was reported to show potential as non-toxic therapeutic agents for the treatment of AD,. Therefore, iron ion chelation can be a potential strategy for the AD treatment. Monoamine oxidases (MAOs) are flavin adenine dinucleotide containing enzymes, which exist as two different isoforms, MAO-A and MAO-B. MAO-A is an effective target for the development of antidepressive drugs, while MAO-B was able to lead to an increase in the levels of hydrogen peroxide and oxidative free radicals, which contribute to the aetiology of the AD. Thus, selective MAO-B inhibitors can be used to treat neurodegenerative disorders such as AD. Natural products have been an exemplary source of new drugs, and many of the currently available medicines have been directly or indirectly derived from them. Coumarins are common natural products, showing a variety of pharmacological activities such as antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, antihypertension, antitumor, and anti-AD effects,. Some coumarin derivatives were reported to demonstrate MAO-B inhibitory activity, which is contributed to their potential anti-AD activity. All in all, coumarin is an optional scaffold to design MAO-B inhibitors for the treatment of AD. Clearly, therapy with a single drug that has multiple biological properties is an effective strategy in the discovery of potent anti-AD lead compounds. If the iron ion chelating and the MAO-B inhibitory pharmacophores were fused in one molecule, the hybrid might show more potent anti-AD activity. To obtain dual-target anti-AD agents, the structures of iron ion chelating hydroxypyridinones derivatives and the coumarin derivatives were combined via Click Chemistry (Figure 1). A series of dual-target compounds were designed, synthesised and biologically evaluated.
Figure 1.

Strategy for the design of dual-target anti-AD agents.

Strategy for the design of dual-target anti-AD agents.

Material and methods

Chemistry

Procedure for the synthesis of intermediate 2

Dry potassium carbonate (58.5 mmol), ethyl maltol (35.7 mmol), and iodomethane (179.0 mmol) were dissolved in acetone (100 mL). After refluxing for 4 h, the reaction mixture was concentrated. Water (200 mL) was added, and the mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 100 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to afford intermediate 2 as a yellow oil.

General procedures for the synthesis of intermediates 3, 4, 11, 12, 17, and 18

A mixture of intermediate 2 (23.2 mmol), amine R-NH2 (25.5 mmol), sodium hydroxide (50.0 mmol) in methanol/water (20 ml/20 mL) was refluxed. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction (about 12 h), the reactant was concentrated under reduced pressure to about half volume. After extracting with dichloromethane (3 × 40 mL), the combined organic layers were washed with brine twice and dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. After removal of the solvent, the crude product 3 was obtained as a brown oil.

General procedures for the synthesis of intermediates 5, 6, 13, 14, 19, and 20

To a mixture of compound 3 (7.4 mmol), triphenylphosphine (8.2 mmol), and sodium azide (37.0 mmol) in dry DMF (50 mL) was added to carbon tetrabromide (8.2 mmol) at room temperature. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h, the residue was purified by short-column chromatography using a gradient of MeOH in dichloromethane (3–5%) to yield 5.

Procedure for the synthesis of intermediate 8

Kojic acid (7) (1.4 mol) was dissolved in thionyl chloride (800 mL) and stirred for 1 h. The product was collected by filtration and washed with petroleum ether, then recrystallized from water to yield a white solid. The white solid intermediate (0.9 mol) was added to 500 mL of distilled water and heated to 50 °C with stirring. Zinc dust (1.9 mol) was added followed by the dropwise addition of concentrated hydrochloric acid (280 mL) over 1 h with vigorous stirring at the temperature between 70 and 80 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for a further 3 h at 70 °C. Excess zinc was removed by hot filtration and the filtrate extracted with dichloromethane (10 × 200 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried, filtered, and concentrated in vacuum to provide the crude product. Recrystallization from isopropanol afforded compound 8.

Procedure for the synthesis of intermediate 9

6-Methyl-3-hydroxypyran-4(1H)-one (8) (54.0 mmol) was added to an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (59.4 mmol) in distilled water (50 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 5 min. 35% Formaldehyde solution (5 mL) was added dropwise over 10 min and the solution was allowed to stir for 12 h. After acidification of the reaction mixture to pH = 1 using concentrated hydrochloric acid and cooling to 3–5 °C for 12 h, intermediate 9 was obtained. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 6.22 (s, 1H), 4.39 (d, J = 6 Hz, 2H), 2.27 (s, 3H).

Procedure for the synthesis of intermediate 10

Intermediate 9 (3.7 mmol) was added to DMSO (30 mL) and the mixture was stirred until intermediate 9 was completely dissolved. This solution was added to KOH (7.3 mmol) and stirred for 3 h. The above reaction vessel was sealed and iodomethane (18.3 mmol) was added dropwise over 10 min and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir overnight. A reddish brown clear mixture was obtained at the end of the period. The reaction mixture was concentrated under pressure and the solid was dissolved in 500 mL water. The aqueous layer was extracted with DCM (5 × 100 mL). The combined extracts was filtered and dried to obtain the crude product as yellow oil. Column chromatography using MeOH/CHCl3 (1: 20, V/V) yielded the pure compound 10 as a white solid.

Procedure for the synthesis of intermediate 15

Intermediates 9 (35.7 mmol), dried potassium carbonate (58.5 mmol) and iodomethane (179 mmol) were dissolved in acetone (100 mL). After refluxing for 4 h, the reaction mixture was concentrated. Water (200 mL) was added and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 100 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to afford 15 as a yellow oil. The crude product was purified by column chromatography with DCM/methanol (150:1, V/V) to yield the product as a yellow oil.

Procedure for the synthesis of intermediate 16

A solution of intermediate 15 (10.0 mmol) in DCM (20 mL) was treated with thionyl chloride (12.0 mmol) at room temperature. The resulting mixture was stirred for 1 h. Then, methanol (10 mL) was added to the mixture. After removal of the solvent, the crude intermediate was obtained as a brown oil. The intermediate (5.0 mmol) was then added to 10 ml of distilled water and the mixture was heated to 50 °C with stirring. Zinc dust (10 mol) was added followed by the dropwise addition of concentrated hydrochloric acid (5 mL) over 1 h with vigorous stirring at the temperature between 70 and 80 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for a further 3 h at 70 °C. After removal of the solvent, the crude intermediate 16 was obtained as a yellow oil.

General procedure for the synthesis of intermediates 22, 24, and 26

Propargyl bromide (2.4 mmol) was added to a suspension of the coumarin (2.0 mmol) and potassium carbonate (4.0 mmol) in acetone (15 mL). The suspension was heated under reflux for 2 h. The reaction was allowed to cool and then concentrated under reduced pressure. Water (30 mL) was added and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 30 mL). The organic extracts were combined and washed with water (20 mL) and brine (20 mL) dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate, then filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.

General procedures for the synthesis of target compounds 27a-k

To a stirred solution of intermediate 13 (2.0 mmol) and alkyne 24 (2.2 mmol) in MeOH/H2O (3:3, V/V), CuSO4.5H2O (2.2 mmol) and sodium ascorbate (0.5 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h and then concentrated under reduced pressure. Water (10 mL) was added and the mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic phases were washed over water (20 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate, and evaporated to dryness. The crude was purified by column chromatography with dichloromethane and methanol (150:1, v/v) to yield the products as white solids. Then, BBr3 (1.5 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of this white solid (0.5 mmol) in dichloromethane (10 mL) at 0 °C under N2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was then warmed up to room temperature and the stirring continued for 12 h. After the reaction, methanol (10 mL) was added to the mixture and was stirred for another 0.5 h. Concentration and recrystallization from methanol/diethyl ether gave compounds as white solids (supplementary material),.

3-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-6-methyl-1–(2-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-7-yl) oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27a)

yellow solid, yield: 81%; m.p.: 212–215 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.34 (s, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (s, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (s, 2H), 4.99 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 4.93 (s, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 4.62 (s, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 161.5, 161.4, 160.7, 155.7, 149.2, 144.7, 142.9, 142.1, 142.0, 130.0, 126.3, 113.5, 113.3, 113.2, 113.1, 102.1, 61.9, 53.2, 50.3, 48.5, 20.1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C21H21N4O6 [M + H]+: 425.1456; found: 425.1439.

3-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-6-methyl-1–(3-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-7-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27b)

yellow solid, yield: 84%; m.p.: 189–192 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.41 (s, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (s, 1H), 7.12 (s, 1H), 7.02 (dd, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (d, J = 9.4, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (s, 2H), 4.76 (s, 2H), 4.61 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 4.45 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 2.37 (m, 6.9 Hz, 2H). 13 C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.5, 161.5, 160.7, 160.0, 155.7, 148.8, 144.7, 142.7, 142.5, 142.3, 130.0, 125.5, 113.5, 113.3, 113.0, 102.0. 62.1. 53.3. 48.7. 47.2 30.0 20.0. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C22H23N4O6 [M + H]+: 439.1612; found: 439.1606.

3-hydroxy-2,6-dimethyl-1–(2-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-7-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27c)

white solid, yield: 93%; m.p.: 256–249 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.34 (s, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (s, 1H), 7.03 (s, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (s, 2H), 4.93 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 4.80 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.34 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 161.4, 160.7, 159.1, 155.7, 148.4, 144.8, 143.1, 142.9, 141.9, 130.0, 126.4, 113.4, 113.2, 113.1, 112.6, 102.1, 61.9, 51.1, 47.7, 20.3, 13.6. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C21H21N4O5 [M + H]+: 409.1518; found: 409.1506.

3-hydroxy-2,6-dimethyl-1–(3-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-7-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27d)

white solid, yield: 87%; m.p.: 263–265 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.43 (s, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (s, 1H), 7.06 (s, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (s, 2H), 4.62 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 4.28 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.51 (s, J = 7.0 Hz, 5H), 2.47 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 161.5, 160.7, 158.6, 155.7, 147.6, 144.7, 142.6, 142.5, 141.8, 130.0, 125.6, 113.4, 113.1, 113.1, 112.6, 102.1, 62.2, 49.1, 47.1, 28.8, 20.3, 13.4. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C22H23N4O5 [M + H]+: 423.1663; found: 423.1676.

2-ethyl-3-hydroxy-1–(3-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-7-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27e)

white solid, yield: 91%; m.p.: 204–206 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.29 (s, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 5.27 (s, 2H), 4.47 (s, 2H), 3.95 (s, 2H), 2.58 (s, 2H), 2.24 (s, 2H), 1.02 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.7, 161.5, 160.7, 155.8, 144.8, 142.6, 137.8, 137.7, 134.1, 129.9, 125.5, 113.4, 113.3, 113.0, 102.0, 62.1, 55.1, 49.8, 47.1, 31.9, 18.9, 13.0.HRMS (ESI) calcd for C21H21N4O5 [M + H]+: 409.1506; found: 409.1512.

2-ethyl-3-hydroxy-1–(2-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-4-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27f)

White solid, yield: 90%; m.p.: 253–256 °C 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (s, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.4, 7.2, Hz, 1H), 7.12 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.31 (d, H), 5.27 (s, 2H), 4.91 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 4.85 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.68 (q, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 1.08 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H). 13 C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 161.4, 160.7, 159.3, 155.7, 146.9, 144.8, 143.2, 142.8, 138.8, 130.1, 126.3, 113.3, 113.2, 113.1, 111.3, 102.1, 61.9, 55.1, 49.8, 19.8, 12.1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C21H21N4O5 [M + H]+: 409.1506; found: 409.1500.

2-ethyl-3-hydroxy-1–(3-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-4-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27g)

White solid, yield: 92%; m.p.: 195–198 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.48 (s, 1H), 8.29 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.17 (s, 1H), 5.45 (s, 2H), 4.59 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 4.43 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.87 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.41 (m, 2H), 1.12 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13 C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.7, 161.9, 159.1, 153.2, 146.5, 143.3, 141.6, 138.8, 133.2, 125.7, 124.6, 123.3, 117.1, 115.6, 111.7, 91.8, 63.2, 53.2, 47.0, 31.5, 20.2, 12.2. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C22H23N4O5 [M + H]+: 423.1815; found: 423.1826.

3-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-6-methyl-1–(2-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-4-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27h)

White solid, yield: 89%; m.p.: 142–148 °C;1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.45 (s, 1H), 7,73 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (m, 2H), 7.26 (s, 1H), 6.17 (s, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), (s, 1H), 5.46 (s, 2H), 5.04 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 4.98 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 4.64 (s, 2H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 2.44(s, 3H). 13 C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.7, 161.9, 161.7, 153.2, 149.3, 143.0, 141.9, 141.8, 143.3, 126.7, 124.6, 123.4, 117.0, 115.5, 113.6, 91.8, 63.1, 53.2, 50.3, 49.1, 20.1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C21H21N4O6 [M + H]+: 425.1415; found: 425.1418.

2-ethyl-3-hydroxy-1–(2-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27i)

White solid, yield: 88%; m.p.: 258–261 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.40 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (s, 1H), 5.43 (s, 2H), 4.96 (t, J = 6 Hz, 2H), 4.89 (t, J = 6 Hz, 2H), 2.73 (q, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 1.10 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 160.3, 160.1, 159.2, 154.1, 152.4, 147.5, 143.2, 142.0, 130.8, 125.6, 124.9, 113.5, 113.0, 111.8, 110.9, 101.4, 61.4, 54.1, 48.2, 18.0, 17.2 HRMS (ESI) calcd for C21H21N4O5 [M + H]+: 409.1612; found: 409.1607.

2-ethyl-3-hydroxy-1–(3-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27j)

White solid, yield: 90%; m.p.: 192–195 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.46 (s, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 7.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (t, J = 8.6, 7.2, Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.18 (s, 1H), 5.45 (s, 2H), 4.58 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 4.42 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.87 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.41 (m, 2H), 1.17 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). 13 C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.8, 160.4, 159.3, 152.2, 147.4, 145.8, 143.2, 142.1, 130.6, 130.6, 125.4, 124.7, 117.7, 113.5, 111.8, 101.2, 61.4, 53.9, 48.2, 17.9, 14.3, 12.4. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C22H23N4O5 [M + H]+: 423.1653; found: 423.1609.

3-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-6-methyl-1–(3-(4-(((2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propyl)pyridin-4(1H)-one (27k)

White solid, yield: 85%; m.p.: 168–170 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.49 (s, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (s, 1H), 6.17 (s, 1H), 5.46 (s, 2H), 4.76 (s, 2H), 4.63 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 4.46 (s, 2H), 2.55 (s, 3H), 2.40 (m, 2H). 13 C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.3, 161.5, 160.7, 159.8, 155.7, 148.8, 144.7, 142.7, 142.5, 142.3, 129.8, 125.5, 113.5, 113.3, 112.9, 102.0. 62.1. 53.1. 48.7. 47.2 30.0 19.8. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C22H23N4O6 [M + H]+: 439.1616; found: 439.1603.

Iron ion chelating activity determination

Instruments and reagents

The automatic titration system used in the test consisted of an automatic titrator, a luminescence 759 s UV-Vis spectrophotometer, and a pH Meter (Mettler Toledo InLab Expert PRO/Mettler Toledo InLab Science). All instruments are controlled by a computer program. The testing solution (2:3 DMSO/KCl (0.1 M), V/V) was maintained at 25 °C using a TP-3A temperature controller. The cuvette is mounted on a spectrophotometer. The E0 and s of the pH Meter were calibrated by three standard solutions (pH = 6.86, 9.18, 4.00). KCl solution (0.1 M) was used to maintain the ionic strength. For the Fe(III) affinity evaluation, the ratio of compounds to iron ion was kept at 1.1:1 (n/n) when Logβ1 was measured; the ratio of compounds to iron ion was kept at 5:1 (n/n) when Logβ2 and Logβ3 were tested.

pKa determination

The titration was performed in a 50 mm path length cuvette. 45 ml KCl (0.1 M) solution, 40 μL of saturated EDTA solution were added to the cuvette. The pH value of the solution was acidified to 2.0 with hydrochloric acid (1.5 M). Then 20 μL of test compound DMSO solution (30 μM/L) was added and stirred vigorously. By adding KOH solution (0.1 M) from the automatic buret, the pH value of the solution was increased by 0.1. After the system was equilibrated (when the change of pH value did not exceed 0.001 within 3 s), the spectral scan was performed once after 30 s. Adding KOH solution (0.1 M) and repeated the automatic process until the specified endpoint of pH value was reached. All data were recorded internally by the Visual Basic program, and the test results are analysed by the HypSpec2014 program.

Determination of iron(III) affinity

Determination of Logβ1

A 45 ml KCl (0.1 M) solution was added to the cuvette (50 mm) and the pH value was acidified to 2.1. Then 30 μM DMSO solution of the testing compound and 60 μL acidic solution of FeCl3 (15 mM) were added separately, and the mixture was vigorously stirred. After the absorbance value is stabilised, a certain amount of HCl solution (4 M) was added by the automatic buret to reduce the pH of the solution by 0.1. After the system was equilibrated, the spectral scan was performed once after 20 min. This protocol was repeated until the specified endpoint of the pH value was reached. All data was recorded with the internal Visual Basic program, HypSpec2014 program was utilised for the data analysis.

Determination of Logβ2 and Logβ3

Similarly, 45 ml KCl (0.1 M) solution was added to the cuvette (50 mm) and the pH value was acidified to 2.1. Then 30 μM DMSO solution of the testing compound and 60 μL acidic solution of FeCl3 (15 mM) were added separately, and the mixture was vigorously stirred. After the absorbance value is stabilised, a certain amount of KOH solution (0.1 M) was added by the automatic buret to increase the pH of the solution by 0.1. After the system was equilibrated, the spectral scan was performed once after 5 min. This protocol was repeated until the specified endpoint of the pH value was reached. All data were recorded with the internal Visual Basic program, HypSpec2014 program was utilised for the data analysis,,.

Calculation of pFe3+

The values of pFe3+ were calculated by HySS software according to the results of pKa1, pKa2, logβ1, logβ2, and logβ3 determined by the above methods. The basic parameters were set as follows: FeOH = –2.563, Fe(OH)2 = –6.205, Fe(OH)3 = –15.1, Fe2(OH)2 = –2.843, Fe3(OH)4 = –6.059, Fe(OH)4 = –21.883.

Determination of human MAO-B inhibitory activity

Human MAO-B (5 mg/mL) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and was pre-aliquoted and stored at -70 °C. 200 μL enzymatic reactions were diluted in 2 ml microcentrifuge tubes by potassium phosphate buffer (Assay Buffer, pH 7.4) which have been provided by Sigma-Aldrich Monoamine Oxidase Assay Kit. The final volumes of the reactions were 100 μL and contained 45 μL MAO-B (0.0075 mg/mL), included 5 μL different concentrations of the testing inhibitors (10 μM, 1 μM), and 50 μL Master Reaction, p-Tyramine, HRP Enzyme and Dye Reagent. Stock solutions of the compounds were prepared in DMSO. The reactions were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in a flat-black bottom 96-well micro test plate in the dark. The results were quantified in a multi-detection microplate fluorescence reader based on the fluorescence generated (excitation, 535 nm; emission, 585 nm). To calculate the IC50 values, these data were fitted to the one site competition model incorporated into the Prism software package (GraphPad),.

Results and discussion

The synthetic routes of coumarinpyridinone hybrids 27a–k were outlined in Schemes 1–5. Kojic acid (7) was used as starting material for the preparation of intermediates 13 and 14. The hydroxymethyl moiety was substituted with the chloromethyl group, which was subsequently reduced by zinc/hydrochloric acid, and the resulting compound 8 was subjected to aldol condensation reaction to introduce a hydroxymethyl moiety to the pyridone scaffold. Protection of the hydroxyl group was achieved by methylation using iodomethane in the presence of K2CO3 or KOH. The oxygen atom was substituted with the nitrogen via reaction with appropriate primary amines to provide the corresponding HPO derivatives 11 and 12 in modest yields. Subsequently, Mitsunobu Reaction was used to synthesised intermediates 13 and 14. Compounds 5, 6, 19, 20 were prepared under similar conditions to the synthesis of compounds 13 and 14. Key intermediates 22, 24, and 26 were efficiently prepared by reaction of propargyl bromide with appropriate commercially available reagents 21, 23, and 25. Finally, designed compounds 27a-k were obtained through the Huisgen 1, 3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reaction (Click Chemistry) of alkyne intermediates 22, 24, and 26 and corresponding azides, followed by demethylation with BBr3. The synthetic route of intermediates 5 and 6. Reagents and conditions: (a) Acetone, CH3I, K2CO3, r.t., 4 h, 93%; (b) MeOH:H2O = 1:1, NH2(CH2)OH, NaOH, reflux, 12 h, 81%–83%; (b) DMF, NaN3, Ph3P, CBr4, r.t., 1 h, 75%–86%. The synthetic route of intermediates 13 and 14. Reagents and conditions: (a) SOCl2, r.t., 4 h, 87%; (b) H2O, Zn, HCl, 70 °C, 72%; (c) 2.0 M NaOH, 37% HCHO, r.t., 12 h, 80%; (d) DMSO, CH3I, KOH, r.t., 10 h, 92%; (e) MeOH:H2O = 1:1, NH2(CH2)OH, NaOH, reflux, 12 h, 78%–82%; (f) DMF, NaN3, Ph3P, CBr4, r.t., 1 h, 76%–78%. The synthetic route of intermediates 19 and 20. Reagents and conditions: (a) Acetone, CH3I, K2CO3, r.t., 4 h, 93%; (b) CH2Cl2, SOCl2, r.t., 4 h, 87%; (c) H2O, Zn, HCl, 70 °C, 72%; (d) MeOH:H2O = 1:1, NH2(CH2)OH, NaOH, reflux, 12 h, 77%–79%; (e) DMF, NaN3, Ph3P, CBr4, r.t., 1 h, 79%–81%. The synthetic route of intermediates 22, 24 and 26. Reagents and conditions: (a) Acetone, Propargyl bromide, K2CO3, reflux, 2 h, 74%–86%. The synthetic route of compounds 27a-k. Reagents and conditions: (a) MeOH:H2O = 1:1, CuSO4·5H2O, sodium ascorbate, 25 °C, 2 h, 81%–92%; (b) CH2Cl2, BBr3, MeOH, 0 °C- r.t., 1 h, 87%–95%.

Iron ion chelating activity

3-Hydroxypyridin-4-one usually has two pKa values. The pKa1 is assigned to the protonation of the 4-oxo group and pKa2 is assigned to the dissociation of the 3-hydroxy group (Scheme 6).
Scheme 6.

The ionisation of hydroxypyridones.

The ionisation of hydroxypyridones. The pKa values and Fe3+ chelating activity of all compounds were listed in Table 1. For free ligands (compounds), the pH-dependent UV spectra of the series of compounds were recorded between 255 and 350 nm in the pH range of 2.4–11.0. The spectroscopy displayed a significant change of the maximum from 280 nm to 315 nm, which reflected the pH-dependence of compounds ionisation equilibrium. The two pKa values of the ligand were shown in Figure 2.
Table 1.

The pKa and pFe3+ values of the compounds 27a-k.

CompoundpKa1pKa2Logβ1Logβ2Logβ3pFe3+
27a2.79.213.824.033.718.9
27b2.88.812.925.533.519.8
27c3.39.714.926.034.118.0
27d3.410.014.926.334.817.6
28e3.29.814.726.033.217.1
27f3.49.814.925.732.816.7
27g3.29.714.625.633.117.1
27h3.09.113.324.833.218.7
27i2.99.614.225.432.817.0
27j3.39.814.625.733.517.1
27k3.39.113.624.533.018.4
Deferiprone3.689.7014.8325.733.617.4
27.0b36.4b20.1b
Deferiprone3.61c9.78c15.03c27.42c37.35c20.7c

The compounds were tested in DMSO:KCl (0.1 M) = 2:3 (V/V) to address the solubility issue.

The data was measured in 0.1 M KCl solution.

The data from reference 17.

Figure 2.

The pH-dependent UV spectra of compounds 27b and 27f. A-1. The pKa values of compound 27b. A-2. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27b over the pH range 2.11 and 10.24 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 oC. B-1. The pKa values of compound 27j. B-2. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27j over the pH range 2.22 and 10.23 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 °C.

The pH-dependent UV spectra of compounds 27b and 27f. A-1. The pKa values of compound 27b. A-2. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27b over the pH range 2.11 and 10.24 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 oC. B-1. The pKa values of compound 27j. B-2. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27j over the pH range 2.22 and 10.23 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 °C. The pKa and pFe3+ values of the compounds 27a-k. The compounds were tested in DMSO:KCl (0.1 M) = 2:3 (V/V) to address the solubility issue. The data was measured in 0.1 M KCl solution. The data from reference 17. The stability constant of the ligand complex is one of the key parameters associated with the chelation efficiency of the ligand. The spectra of the complex of Fe3+ and ligand at different pH values are illustrated in Figure 3. The morphological spectrum exhibited a significant change in maximum absorption from 560 nm to 450 nm. Compounds 27a and 27b, displayed the most chelating activity with pFe3+ values of 18.9 and 19.8, respectively, which were superior to that of the positive drug deferiprone (pFe3+ = 17.4). Most of the compounds showed promising pFe3+chelating effect with pFe3+ values around 17.
Figure 3.

The pH-dependent UV spectra of compounds 27b and 27f. A-1. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27b in the presence of Fe3+ over the pH range 1.25 and 2.21 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 °C, [Fe3+] = 1.0 μM, [27b] = 1.1 μM. A-2. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27b in the presence of Fe3+ over the pH range 2.45 and 8.38 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 °C, [Fe3+] = 1.0 μM, [27b] = 5.0 μM. B-1. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27j in the presence of Fe3+ over the pH range 1.14 and 2.14 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 °C, [Fe3+] = 1.0 μM, [27j] = 5.0 μM. B-2. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27j in the presence of Fe3+ over the pH range 2.41 and 9.61 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 oC, [Fe3+] = 1.0 μM, [27j] = 5.0 μM.

The pH-dependent UV spectra of compounds 27b and 27f. A-1. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27b in the presence of Fe3+ over the pH range 1.25 and 2.21 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 °C, [Fe3+] = 1.0 μM, [27b] = 1.1 μM. A-2. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27b in the presence of Fe3+ over the pH range 2.45 and 8.38 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 °C, [Fe3+] = 1.0 μM, [27b] = 5.0 μM. B-1. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27j in the presence of Fe3+ over the pH range 1.14 and 2.14 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 °C, [Fe3+] = 1.0 μM, [27j] = 5.0 μM. B-2. The pH-dependence of the spectrum of compound 27j in the presence of Fe3+ over the pH range 2.41 and 9.61 in 0.1 M KCl at 25 oC, [Fe3+] = 1.0 μM, [27j] = 5.0 μM.

Inhibition of human MAO-B

The MAO-B inhibitory properties of all the synthesised hybrids of coumarin and hydroxypyridin-4-one derivatives were tested. The compounds were first preliminarily evaluated at two concentrations, 1 and 10 μM. Compounds exhibiting significant inhibition were then submitted to the IC50 test. As illustrated in Table 2, when the hydroxypyridinones were introduced into the parent structure of coumarins, the obtained compounds successfully maintained the inhibitory activity against MAO-B. Most of the compounds exhibited weak anti-MAO-B effect at the concentration of 1 μM, but when the concentration reached 10 μM, the inhibitory effect was substantially over 90%. Therefore, the IC50 values of all compounds are below 10 μM. At the concentration of 1 μM, the inhibitory rate of compounds 27a and 27g exceeded 20%, while compounds 27f, 27i, and 27k exceeded 30% inhibition. Compounds 27b and 27j were proved to be the most potent hybrids, with 54% and 62% inhibition, respectively. Compounds 27b and 27j were further tested for IC50 based on the comparison of the inhibitory activity of all compounds at two concentrations. IC50 values of the two compounds were 0.68 and 0.86 μM, respectively (Table 3).
Table 2.

The MAO-B inhibitory activity of the compounds 27a-k.

CompoundsInhibitory rate (%)
1 μM10 μM
27a27.17%96.25%
27b54.02%95.63%
27c1.84%90.98%
27d9.67%98.34%
27e1.23%95.69%
27f34.48%93.28%
27g20.52%89.46%
27h13.24%85.73%
27i32.44%94.00%
27j62.43%88.84%
27k35.63%90.52%
Table 3.

The structures and IC50 values of compounds 27b and 27j.

CompoundStructureIC50 (μM)
27b0.68
27j0.86
Pargyline0.09
The MAO-B inhibitory activity of the compounds 27a-k. The structures and IC50 values of compounds 27b and 27j.

Structure-activity relationship discussion

In terms of the iron ion chelating activity, all target compounds demonstrated favourite iron ion chelating activity with pFe3+ values more than 17. When a hydroxymethyl group is introduced to the 2-position of the hydroxypyridinone, the iron chelating activity is much better. In addition, the length of the carbon chain between the hydroxypyridinone and triazole showed no obvious influence on the iron chelating effect. The MAO-B inhibitory activity of the compounds can be well maintained by using the triazole product of Click Chemistry as the linker. Additionally, the length of the carbon chains attached to the triazole and the hydroxypyridinone have an indistinctive impact on the anti-MAO-B activity, and no significant difference in the activity of ethyl or propyl group is observed. The MAO-B inhibitory activity of most coumarin 3- or 7-substituted derivatives is significantly better than the 4-substituted compounds.

Conclusion

Hydroxypyridinone derivatives are potential agents for the AD treatment by chelating the iron ions accumulated in the brain, while coumarins also lead anti-AD candidates via inhibiting MAO-B. Taking the coumarin derivatives and hydroxypyridinones as the lead compounds, a series of dual-target hybrids were designed and synthesised by integrating their key pharmacophores. The targeted compounds were biologically evaluated for their iron ion chelating and MAO-B inhibitory activity. A majority of the hybrids displayed excellent iron ion chelating activity. Compounds 27b and 27j exhibited the most potent MAO-B inhibitory activity, and IC50 values of the two compounds were 0.68 and 0.86 μM, respectively. In summary, the hybrids of coumarin derivatives and hydroxypyridinones were proved to display both potent iron ion chelating effect and MAO-B inhibitory activity. These dual-target compounds have the potential to demonstrate in vivo anti-AD activity. These results also proved that developing dual-target agents is a possible strategy for the treatment of AD.
  22 in total

Review 1.  Multi-target-directed ligands to combat neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Andrea Cavalli; Maria Laura Bolognesi; Anna Minarini; Michela Rosini; Vincenzo Tumiatti; Maurizio Recanatini; Carlo Melchiorre
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  GLEE, a new computer program for glass electrode calibration.

Authors:  P Gans; B O'Sullivan
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2000-01-24       Impact factor: 6.057

3.  A novel series of tacrine-selegiline hybrids with cholinesterase and monoamine oxidase inhibition activities for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Chuanjun Lu; Qi Zhou; Jun Yan; Zhiyun Du; Ling Huang; Xingshu Li
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Lipophilicity plays a major role in modulating the inhibition of monoamine oxidase B by 7-substituted coumarins.

Authors:  Angelo Carotti; Cosimo Altomare; Marco Catto; Carmela Gnerre; Luciana Summo; Agostino De Marco; Sarah Rose; Peter Jenner; Bernard Testa
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Synthesis, physical-chemical characterisation and biological evaluation of novel 2-amido-3-hydroxypyridin-4(1H)-ones: Iron chelators with the potential for treating Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Alessandra Gaeta; Francisco Molina-Holgado; Xiao L Kong; Sarah Salvage; Sarah Fakih; Paul T Francis; Robert J Williams; Robert C Hider
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  The transition metals copper and iron in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Susana Rivera-Mancía; Iván Pérez-Neri; Camilo Ríos; Luis Tristán-López; Liliana Rivera-Espinosa; Sergio Montes
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.192

7.  8-Aryl- and alkyloxycaffeine analogues as inhibitors of monoamine oxidase.

Authors:  Belinda Strydom; Jacobus J Bergh; Jacobus P Petzer
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.514

8.  Multi-target-directed drug design strategy: from a dual binding site acetylcholinesterase inhibitor to a trifunctional compound against Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Maria Laura Bolognesi; Andrea Cavalli; Luca Valgimigli; Manuela Bartolini; Michela Rosini; Vincenza Andrisano; Maurizio Recanatini; Carlo Melchiorre
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Prediction of 3-hydroxypyridin-4-one (HPO) log K1 values for Fe(III).

Authors:  Yu-Lin Chen; Dave J Barlow; Xiao-Le Kong; Yong-Min Ma; Robert C Hider
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.390

10.  Iron promotes the toxicity of amyloid beta peptide by impeding its ordered aggregation.

Authors:  Beinan Liu; Aileen Moloney; Sarah Meehan; Kyle Morris; Sally E Thomas; Louise C Serpell; Robert Hider; Stefan J Marciniak; David A Lomas; Damian C Crowther
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  3 in total

1.  Hippocampal Iron Accumulation Impairs Synapses and Memory via Suppressing Furin Expression and Downregulating BDNF Maturation.

Authors:  Xue Bai; Yi Zhang; Yating Zhang; Shanshan Yao; Yiduo Cui; Lin-Hao You; Peng Yu; Yan-Zhong Chang; Guofen Gao
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 2.  Iron and Ferroptosis as Therapeutic Targets in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Andrew Gleason; Ashley I Bush
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Discovery of benzamide-hydroxypyridinone hybrids as potent multi-targeting agents for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Xiaoying Jiang; Jianan Guo; Changjun Zhang; Jinping Gu; Tao Zhou; Renren Bai; Yuanyuan Xie
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.051

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.