Literature DB >> 31415845

An automatic behavior recognition system classifies animal behaviors using movements and their temporal context.

Primoz Ravbar1, Kristin Branson2, Julie H Simpson3.   

Abstract

Animals can perform complex and purposeful behaviors by executing simpler movements in flexible sequences. It is particularly challenging to analyze behavior sequences when they are highly variable, as is the case in language production, certain types of birdsong and, as in our experiments, flies grooming. High sequence variability necessitates rigorous quantification of large amounts of data to identify organizational principles and temporal structure of such behavior. To cope with large amounts of data, and minimize human effort and subjective bias, researchers often use automatic behavior recognition software. Our standard grooming assay involves coating flies in dust and videotaping them as they groom to remove it. The flies move freely and so perform the same movements in various orientations. As the dust is removed, their appearance changes. These conditions make it difficult to rely on precise body alignment and anatomical landmarks such as eyes or legs and thus present challenges to existing behavior classification software. Human observers use speed, location, and shape of the movements as the diagnostic features of particular grooming actions. We applied this intuition to design a new automatic behavior recognition system (ABRS) based on spatiotemporal features in the video data, heavily weighted for temporal dynamics and invariant to the animal's position and orientation in the scene. We use these spatiotemporal features in two steps of supervised classification that reflect two time-scales at which the behavior is structured. As a proof of principle, we show results from quantification and analysis of a large data set of stimulus-induced fly grooming behaviors that would have been difficult to assess in a smaller dataset of human-annotated ethograms. While we developed and validated this approach to analyze fly grooming behavior, we propose that the strategy of combining alignment-invariant features and multi-timescale analysis may be generally useful for movement-based classification of behavior from video data.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Grooming; Machine learning; Neuroethology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31415845      PMCID: PMC6779137          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  16 in total

1.  Efficient visual search of videos cast as text retrieval.

Authors:  Josef Sivic; Andrew Zisserman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  Systematic exploration of unsupervised methods for mapping behavior.

Authors:  Jeremy G Todd; Jamey S Kain; Benjamin L de Bivort
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  Machine vision methods for analyzing social interactions.

Authors:  Alice A Robie; Kelly M Seagraves; S E Roian Egnor; Kristin Branson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Toward a science of computational ethology.

Authors:  David J Anderson; Pietro Perona
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Vocal exploration is locally regulated during song learning.

Authors:  Primoz Ravbar; Dina Lipkind; Lucas C Parra; Ofer Tchernichovski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Automated analysis of long-term grooming behavior in Drosophila using a k-nearest neighbors classifier.

Authors:  Bing Qiao; Chiyuan Li; Victoria W Allen; Mimi Shirasu-Hiza; Sheyum Syed
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Fast animal pose estimation using deep neural networks.

Authors:  Talmo D Pereira; Diego E Aldarondo; Lindsay Willmore; Mikhail Kislin; Samuel S-H Wang; Mala Murthy; Joshua W Shaevitz
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  A suppression hierarchy among competing motor programs drives sequential grooming in Drosophila.

Authors:  Andrew M Seeds; Primoz Ravbar; Phuong Chung; Stefanie Hampel; Frank M Midgley; Brett D Mensh; Julie H Simpson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Mapping the stereotyped behaviour of freely moving fruit flies.

Authors:  Gordon J Berman; Daniel M Choi; William Bialek; Joshua W Shaevitz
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  P1 interneurons promote a persistent internal state that enhances inter-male aggression in Drosophila.

Authors:  Eric D Hoopfer; Yonil Jung; Hidehiko K Inagaki; Gerald M Rubin; David J Anderson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Computational Neuroethology: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Sandeep Robert Datta; David J Anderson; Kristin Branson; Pietro Perona; Andrew Leifer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Behavioral evidence for nested central pattern generator control of Drosophila grooming.

Authors:  Primoz Ravbar; Neil Zhang; Julie H Simpson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Distinct movement patterns generate stages of spider web building.

Authors:  Abel Corver; Nicholas Wilkerson; Jeremiah Miller; Andrew Gordus
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Selfee, self-supervised features extraction of animal behaviors.

Authors:  Yinjun Jia; Shuaishuai Li; Xuan Guo; Bo Lei; Junqiang Hu; Xiao-Hong Xu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  A hierarchical 3D-motion learning framework for animal spontaneous behavior mapping.

Authors:  Kang Huang; Yaning Han; Ke Chen; Hongli Pan; Gaoyang Zhao; Wenling Yi; Xiaoxi Li; Siyuan Liu; Pengfei Wei; Liping Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  Dopamine modulation of sensory processing and adaptive behavior in flies.

Authors:  K P Siju; Jean-Francois De Backer; Ilona C Grunwald Kadow
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Variation and Variability in Drosophila Grooming Behavior.

Authors:  Joshua M Mueller; Neil Zhang; Jean M Carlson; Julie H Simpson
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  A pair of commissural command neurons induces Drosophila wing grooming.

Authors:  Neil Zhang; Julie H Simpson
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-03

9.  Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila.

Authors:  Neil Zhang; Li Guo; Julie H Simpson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Recognition of Common Non-Normal Walking Actions Based on Relief-F Feature Selection and Relief-Bagging-SVM.

Authors:  Pan Huang; Yanping Li; Xiaoyi Lv; Wen Chen; Shuxian Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.