Literature DB >> 33838142

The effect of retinal scaffold modulus on performance during surgical handling.

Rion J Wendland1, Chunhua Jiao2, Stephen R Russell2, Ian C Han2, Luke A Wiley2, Budd A Tucker2, Elliott H Sohn2, Kristan S Worthington3.   

Abstract

Emerging treatment strategies for retinal degeneration involve replacing lost photoreceptors using supportive scaffolds to ensure cells survive the implantation process. While many design aspects of these scaffolds, including material chemistry and microstructural cues, have been studied in depth, a full set of design constraints has yet to be established. For example, while known to be important in other tissues and systems, the influence of mechanical properties on surgical handling has not been quantified. In this study, photocrosslinked poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate (PEGDMA) was used as a model polymer to study the effects of scaffold modulus (stiffness) on surgical handling, independent of material chemistry. This was achieved by modulating the molecular weight and concentrations of the PEGDMA in various prepolymer solutions. Scaffold modulus of each formulation was measured using photo-rheology, which enabled the collection of real-time polymerization data. In addition to measuring scaffold mechanical properties, this approach gave insight on polymerization kinetics, which were used to determine the polymerization time required for each sample. Scaffold handling characteristics were qualitatively evaluated using both in vitro and ex vivo trials that mimicked the surgical procedure. In these trials, scaffolds with shear moduli above 35 kPa performed satisfactorily, while those below this limit performed poorly. In other words, scaffolds below this modulus were too fragile for reliable transplantation. To better compare these results with literature values, the compressive modulus was measured for select samples, with the lower shear modulus limit corresponding to roughly 115 kPa compressive modulus. While an upper mechanical property limit was not readily apparent from these results, there was increased variability in surgical handling performance in samples with shear moduli above 800 kPa. Overall, the knowledge presented here provides important groundwork for future studies designed to examine additional retinal scaffold considerations, including the effect of scaffold mechanical properties on retinal progenitor cell fate.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33838142      PMCID: PMC8187337          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2021.108566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.770


  39 in total

1.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate.

Authors:  C M Lo; H B Wang; M Dembo; Y L Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Stem cells and retinal repair.

Authors:  Henry Klassen; Donald S Sakaguchi; Michael J Young
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  The influence of substrate stiffness on the behavior and functions of Schwann cells in culture.

Authors:  Yun Gu; Yawei Ji; Yahong Zhao; Yan Liu; Fei Ding; Xiaosong Gu; Yumin Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  A microfabricated scaffold for retinal progenitor cell grafting.

Authors:  William L Neeley; Stephen Redenti; Henry Klassen; Sarah Tao; Tejal Desai; Michael J Young; Robert Langer
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Biodegradable polymer composite grafts promote the survival and differentiation of retinal progenitor cells.

Authors:  Minoru Tomita; Erin Lavik; Henry Klassen; Tasneem Zahir; Robert Langer; Michael J Young
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.277

6.  Individual variations in human cone photoreceptor packing density: variations with refractive error.

Authors:  Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Hongxin Song; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Soft microenvironments promote the early neurogenic differentiation but not self-renewal of human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Albert J Keung; Prashanth Asuri; Sanjay Kumar; David V Schaffer
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Retinal repair by transplantation of photoreceptor precursors.

Authors:  R E MacLaren; R A Pearson; A MacNeil; R H Douglas; T E Salt; M Akimoto; A Swaroop; J C Sowden; R R Ali
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Allogenic iPSC-derived RPE cell transplants induce immune response in pigs: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elliott H Sohn; Chunhua Jiao; Emily Kaalberg; Cathryn Cranston; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Using human induced pluripotent stem cells to treat retinal disease.

Authors:  S Borooah; M J Phillips; B Bilican; A F Wright; I Wilmut; S Chandran; D Gamm; B Dhillon
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 21.198

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Interpenetrating polymeric network (IPNs) in ophthalmic drug delivery: Breaking the barriers.

Authors:  Sachin Rathod
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.029

Review 2.  Outer Retinal Cell Replacement: Putting the Pieces Together.

Authors:  Allison L Ludwig; David M Gamm
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.283

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.