Literature DB >> 31412972

Understanding cognitive impairment in mood disorders: mediation analyses in the UK Biobank cohort.

Breda Cullen1, Daniel J Smith2, Ian J Deary3, Jill P Pell4, Katherine M Keyes5, Jonathan J Evans2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is strongly linked with persistent disability in people with mood disorders, but the factors that explain cognitive impairment in this population are unclear. AIMS: To estimate the total effect of (a) bipolar disorder and (b) major depression on cognitive function, and the magnitude of the effect that is explained by potentially modifiable intermediate factors.
METHOD: Cross-sectional study using baseline data from the UK Biobank cohort. Participants were categorised as having bipolar disorder (n = 2709), major depression (n = 50 975) or no mood disorder (n = 102 931 and n = 105 284). The outcomes were computerised tests of reasoning, reaction time and memory. The potential mediators were cardiometabolic disease and psychotropic medication. Analyses were informed by graphical methods and controlled for confounding using regression, propensity score-based methods and G-computation.
RESULTS: Group differences of small magnitude were found on a visuospatial memory test. Z-score differences for the bipolar disorder group were in the range -0.23 to -0.17 (95% CI -0.39 to -0.03) across different estimation methods, and for the major depression group they were approximately -0.07 (95% CI -0.10 to -0.03). One-quarter of the effect was mediated via psychotropic medication in the bipolar disorder group (-0.05; 95% CI -0.09 to -0.01). No evidence was found for mediation via cardiometabolic disease.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large community-based sample in middle to early old age, bipolar disorder and depression were associated with lower visuospatial memory performance, in part potentially due to psychotropic medication use. Mood disorders and their treatments will have increasing importance for population cognitive health as the proportion of older adults continues to grow. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: I.J.D. is a UK Biobank participant. J.P.P. is a member of the UK Biobank Steering Committee.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar affective disorders; depressive disorders; epidemiology; outcome studies; psychological testing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31412972      PMCID: PMC7825642          DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2019.188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  30 in total

Review 1.  Gender differences in depression.

Authors:  Gordon Parker; Heather Brotchie
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2010

2.  Random measurement error and regression dilution bias.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hutcheon; Arnaud Chiolero; James A Hanley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-06-23

Review 3.  A review on the impact of cognitive dysfunction on social, occupational, and general functional outcomes in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Bernhard T Baune; Gin S Malhi
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.744

4.  Meta-analytic review of neurocognition in bipolar II disorder.

Authors:  E Bora; M Yücel; C Pantelis; M Berk
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.392

5.  Meta-analyses of cognitive functioning in euthymic bipolar patients and their first-degree relatives.

Authors:  B Arts; N Jabben; L Krabbendam; J van Os
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 6.  The relationship between neurocognitive and psychosocial functioning in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vanessa C Evans; Grant L Iverson; Lakshmi N Yatham; Raymond W Lam
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  Cohort Profile: the 'children of the 90s'--the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.

Authors:  Andy Boyd; Jean Golding; John Macleod; Debbie A Lawlor; Abigail Fraser; John Henderson; Lynn Molloy; Andy Ness; Susan Ring; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants With Those of the General Population.

Authors:  Anna Fry; Thomas J Littlejohns; Cathie Sudlow; Nicola Doherty; Ligia Adamska; Tim Sprosen; Rory Collins; Naomi E Allen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Mediation analysis with intermediate confounding: structural equation modeling viewed through the causal inference lens.

Authors:  Bianca L De Stavola; Rhian M Daniel; George B Ploubidis; Nadia Micali
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Cognitive Test Scores in UK Biobank: Data Reduction in 480,416 Participants and Longitudinal Stability in 20,346 Participants.

Authors:  Donald M Lyall; Breda Cullen; Mike Allerhand; Daniel J Smith; Daniel Mackay; Jonathan Evans; Jana Anderson; Chloe Fawns-Ritchie; Andrew M McIntosh; Ian J Deary; Jill P Pell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  An Updated Analysis of Psychotropic Medicine Utilisation in Older People in New Zealand from 2005 to 2019.

Authors:  Prasad S Nishtala; Te-Yuan Chyou
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.271

2.  Cognitive functioning and lifetime major depressive disorder in UK Biobank.

Authors:  Laura de Nooij; Mathew A Harris; Mark J Adams; Toni-Kim Clarke; Xueyi Shen; Simon R Cox; Andrew M McIntosh; Heather C Whalley
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.361

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.