Literature DB >> 31412960

Increased pregnancy outcome after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of human vitrified-warmed blastocysts.

Romualdo Sciorio1, K J Thong1, Susan J Pickering1.   

Abstract

Vitrification is a highly efficient technique for the cryopreservation of the human embryo. The effect of delayed blastulation may be responsible for implantation failures and negatively affects in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. The current literature displays discordant results; some studies have announced higher pregnancy rates after day 5 (D5) transfer compared with day 6 (D6) transfer, while others have shown equivalent outcomes. In the present study an investigation into the clinical implications of delayed blastulation (D5 versus D6) was carried out. We performed a retrospective study comparing clinical pregnancies and implantation rates following warmed single blastocyst transfer (WSBT). All patients coming for a programmed warmed transfer at Edinburgh Assisted Conception Programme, EFREC, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, were included in this study and divided in two groups according to the day of blastocyst vitrification: D5 (n = 1563) and D6 (n = 517). The overall survival rate was 95.0% (1976/2080) with no significant difference between the D5 and D6 groups: 95.3% (1489/1563) and 94.2% (487/517) respectively. WSBT of D6 blastocysts resulted in a lower implantation and clinical pregnancy compared with D5 embryos. The implantation rate (IPR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) were respectively 49.4% and 42.6% for the D5 and 37.4% and 32.2% for the D6 embryos, which was statistically significant. The multiple pregnancy rate was 1.32% (1.14% for D5 vs 1.84% for D6). Although the transfer of D6 vitrified-warmed blastocyst remains a reasonable option, priority to a D5 embryo would reduce the time to successful pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst vitrification/warming; Closed device vitrification; Pregnancy and implantation rates; Single embryo transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31412960     DOI: 10.1017/S0967199419000273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zygote        ISSN: 0967-1994            Impact factor:   1.442


  6 in total

1.  Effect of Embryo Developmental Stage, Morphological Grading, and Ploidy Status on Live Birth Rate in Frozen Cycles of Single Blastocyst Transfer.

Authors:  Hui Ji; Yuxi Zhou; Shanren Cao; Junqiang Zhang; Xiufeng Ling; Chun Zhao; Rong Shen
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Comparison of day 5 blastocyst with day 6 blastocyst: Evidence from NGS-based PGT-A results.

Authors:  Jing Tong; Yichao Niu; Anran Wan; Ting Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Birthweight After Frozen Embryos Formed on the Fifth Day Versus the Sixth Day: A Retrospective Analysis Including 17,127 Singleton Newborns.

Authors:  Junlan Yang; Ze Wang; Hairu Cao; Lu Liu; Qiaona Yuan; Haiyan Xu; Rong Tang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.055

4.  Day 5 vs day 6 single euploid blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: which variables do have an impact on the clinical pregnancy rates?

Authors:  Andrea Abdala; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Ahmed El-Damen; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi; Neelke De Munck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Clinical outcomes for Day 3 double cleavage-stage embryo transfers versus Day 5 or 6 single blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles: a retrospective comparative analysis.

Authors:  Jinpeng Rao; Feng Qiu; Shen Tian; Ya Yu; Ying Zhang; Zheng Gu; Yiting Cai; Fan Jin; Min Jin
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Frozen blastocysts: Assessing the importance of day 5/day 6 blastocysts or blastocyst quality.

Authors:  Yan Jiang; Ge Song; Xu-Hui Zhang; Sui-Bing Miao; Xiao-Hua Wu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.