Daisuke Shimizu1, Dai Miyazaki2, Fumie Ehara1, Yumiko Shimizu1, Ryu Uotani1, Koudai Inata1, Shin-Ichi Sasaki1, Yoshitsugu Inoue1. 1. Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan. 2. Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan. miyazaki-ttr@umin.ac.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of real-time PCR for 16S ribosomal DNA (16S r-DNA) and sequencing for diagnosing microbial keratitis. METHODS: We studied 272 eyes of 272 patients with keratitis. Eyes with keratitis were classified as "definite" (N = 118), "likely" (N = 71), or "non-bacterial" (N = 83) to have bacterial keratitis. The diagnostic efficacy of real-time PCR and conventional testing was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The copy numbers of bacterial DNA and clinical characteristics were retrospectively analyzed for association with concordant culture results in the "definite" cases. RESULTS: The level of bacterial DNA was significantly associated with the diagnostic probability of the three diagnostic categories. The level of bacterial DNA had comparable diagnostic efficacy with the area under the curve (AUC) at 0.67, by culture at 0.65, and by smear testing at 0.73. The efficacy was significantly improved by combining the DNA level with the conventional culture testing with an AUC of 0.81. Analysis of the "definite" cases showed culture positivity in 51.8% (58 eyes), and of these, 41 eyes (70.7%) were higher than the cutoff PCR values and 40 eyes were identified by 16S r-DNA sequencing. In the culture-negative eyes, the level of bacterial DNA was significantly lower (P = 0.0008). Eyes with higher bacterial DNA levels had significantly concordant outcomes with sequencing and culture results (P = 0.006). Previous antibiotic treatments decreased the bacterial DNA amount by 0.09-fold, and it was a significant factor for discordance (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Quantification of the bacterial DNA level and conventional testing improves the diagnostic efficacy of infectious bacterial keratitis.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of real-time PCR for 16S ribosomal DNA (16S r-DNA) and sequencing for diagnosing microbial keratitis. METHODS: We studied 272 eyes of 272 patients with keratitis. Eyes with keratitis were classified as "definite" (N = 118), "likely" (N = 71), or "non-bacterial" (N = 83) to have bacterial keratitis. The diagnostic efficacy of real-time PCR and conventional testing was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The copy numbers of bacterial DNA and clinical characteristics were retrospectively analyzed for association with concordant culture results in the "definite" cases. RESULTS: The level of bacterial DNA was significantly associated with the diagnostic probability of the three diagnostic categories. The level of bacterial DNA had comparable diagnostic efficacy with the area under the curve (AUC) at 0.67, by culture at 0.65, and by smear testing at 0.73. The efficacy was significantly improved by combining the DNA level with the conventional culture testing with an AUC of 0.81. Analysis of the "definite" cases showed culture positivity in 51.8% (58 eyes), and of these, 41 eyes (70.7%) were higher than the cutoff PCR values and 40 eyes were identified by 16S r-DNA sequencing. In the culture-negative eyes, the level of bacterial DNA was significantly lower (P = 0.0008). Eyes with higher bacterial DNA levels had significantly concordant outcomes with sequencing and culture results (P = 0.006). Previous antibiotic treatments decreased the bacterial DNA amount by 0.09-fold, and it was a significant factor for discordance (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Quantification of the bacterial DNA level and conventional testing improves the diagnostic efficacy of infectious bacterial keratitis.
Authors: Scott C Hau; John K G Dart; Minna Vesaluoma; Dipak N Parmar; Ilse Claerhout; Kanom Bibi; Daniel F P Larkin Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Aaron Y Lee; Lakshmi Akileswaran; Michael D Tibbetts; Sunir J Garg; Russell N Van Gelder Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Silvana K Rampini; Guido V Bloemberg; Peter M Keller; Andrea C Büchler; Günter Dollenmaier; Roberto F Speck; Erik C Böttger Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Charlotte Shan Ho; Jessica Cairns; Ahmad Elsahn; Mouhamed Al-Aqaba; Tim Boswell; Dalia G Said; Harminder Singh Dua Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Tobi F Somerville; Caroline E Corless; Henri Sueke; Timothy Neal; Stephen B Kaye Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Darren S J Ting; Bhavesh P Gopal; Rashmi Deshmukh; Gerami D Seitzman; Dalia G Said; Harminder S Dua Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Mihail Zemba; Otilia-Maria Dumitrescu; Andreea-Elena Dimirache; Daniel Constantin Branisteanu; Florian Balta; Marian Burcea; Andreea Dana Moraru; Sinziana Gradinaru Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 2.447