| Literature DB >> 31410081 |
Nadjia Ahmane1, Dina Atmani-Kilani1, Nassima Chaher1, Karima Ayouni1, Meriem Rahmani-Berboucha1, Grégory DA Costa2, Nadjet Debbache-Benaida1, Tristan Richard2, Djebbar Atmani1.
Abstract
Fraxinus angustifolia leaves and bark are used in traditional medicine against various inflammatory-related pathologies incumbent to reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation by the NADH oxidase activity of enzymes such as xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR). This study was designed to investigate the in vitro and in vivo inhibitory activities of this enzyme by Fraxinus angustifolia extracts. The leaf organic phase of ethyl acetate (LFA) and its bark aqueous counterpart (BFA) showed the strongest anti-NADH oxidase activity in vitro (IC50 = 38.51 and 42.04 µg mL-1, respectively). They consequently suppressed superoxide generation both enzymatically (53% and 19%, respectively) and nonenzymatically (34% and 19%, respectively). These results were corroborated in vivo, with high antiNADH oxidase potential of the leaves and bark extracts (75.32% and 51.32%, respectively) concomitant with moderate hypouricemic activities (36.84% and 38.59%, respectively). Bio-guided fractionation led to the identification, by LC-DAD-MS/MS, of esculin and calcelarioside in bark and kaempferol glucoside in leaves as the main compounds responsible for the anti-NADH oxidase activity of XOR. These results plead in favor of the use of F. angustifolia as a source of potentially interesting therapeutic substances.Entities:
Keywords: Fraxinus angustifolia; NADH oxidase; hyperuricemia; phenolics; xanthine oxidoreductase
Year: 2019 PMID: 31410081 PMCID: PMC6667094 DOI: 10.3906/biy-1810-26
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Turk J Biol ISSN: 1300-0152
Extraction yields, total phenols, flavonoids, tannins, and inhibition of NADH oxidase activity of F. angustifolia extracts from leaves and bark obtained by sequential extraction.
| Extracts | Yield (%) | Total phenols(mg VAE g−1) | Flavonoids(mg RE g−1) | Tannins(mg TAE g−1) | Inhibition of NADHactivity (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Bark | Leaves | Bark | Leaves | Bark | Leaves | Bark | Leaves | Bark | ||
| Ethanolic | 17 | 5 | 536 ± 1 | 83 ± 1 | 31 ± 1 | 63 ± 2 | 159 ± 3 | 394 ± 49 | 73*** | 85*** | |
| Ethyl acetate | 11 | 0.7 | 27 ± 1 | 189 ± 1 | 46 ± 1 | 43 ± 1 | 327 ± 8 | 66 ± 5 | 87 | 86*** | |
| Aqueous ethyl acetate | 6 | 2.85 | 529 ± 1 | 68 ± 1 | 31 ± 1 | 39 ± 2 | 66 ± 1 | 23 ± 23 | 63*** | 91* | |
| Chloroform | 10 | 0.5 | 389 ± 1 | 170 ± 1 | 35 ± 1 | 55 ± 2 | 313 ± 6 | 877 ± 17 | 80* | 80*** | |
| Aqueous chloroform | 0.3 | 0.05 | 1144 ± 1 | 25 ± 1 | 30 ± 1 | 62 ± 2 | 57 ± 5 | 45 ± 44 | 68*** | 73*** | |
| Esculin | 86*** | ||||||||||
Data are presented as means ± SD, n = 3. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett multiple comparison test was used for statistical significance. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 when compared with normal control values. ANOVA = Analysis of variance; SD = standard deviation; VAE = Vanillic acid equivalent per gram of extract; TAE = Tannic acid equivalent per gram of extract; RE = Rutin equivalent per gram of extract.
Figure 1Lineweaver Burk representation of the inhibition of the NADH oxidase activity of XDH by ethyl acetate leaves (LFA) (A) and aqueous ethyl acetate bark (BFA) (B) extracts of F. angustifolia, rutin (C) and esculin (D).
Kinetic parameters of ethyl acetate leaves and aqueous ethyl acetate bark extracts of F. angustifolia on NADH oxidase activity.
| Km (µM) | Km’ (µM) | Vmax (Δabs S−1) | Vmax’ (Δabs S−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | 40 | 152 | 7.7 | 2.0 |
| Bark | 47 | 133 | 10 | 3.6 |
| Rutin | 50 | 8 | 0.2 | 0.03 |
| Esculin | 16.66 | 49.98 | 4 | 1.33 |
Figure 2Scavenging activity of superoxide anion generated by PMS-NADH by F. angustifolia extracts, and rutin.
Superoxide production and inhibition of superoxide anion generated by NADH – XDH system by F. angustifolia extracts.
| Extracts (100 µg mL−1) | Superoxide production(mM) ± SD | Superoxide inhibition(%) ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| Ethyl acetate of leaves | 0.016 ± 0.02 | 53.69 ± 0.07 |
| Aqueous ethyl acetate of bark | 0.028 ± 0.07 | 19.17 ± 0.02 |
| Rutin | 0.019 ± 0.001 | 44.1 ± 0.001 |
Identification of phenolic compounds in ethyl acetate leaves extract of F. angustifolia using retention times, LC-MS and UV data.
| Peak | RT (min) | UV max(nm) | m/z | Aires | (mg eq quercetin kg−1 extract) | Identification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [M-H−] | MS/MS− | ||||||
| 1 | 1.5 | 280 | 153 | 123 | 11.59 | 154.12 ± 3.5 | Hydroxytyrosol (Niemetz and Gross, 2001) |
| 2 | 4.7 | 360-260 | 609 | 301-208-146-273-343 | 45.49 | 253.40 ± 2.5 | Quercetin rutinoside(Niemetz and Gross, 2001) |
| 3 | 4.9 | 340-285280 | 463623 | 301-162461-162 | 29.74 | 207.28 ± 2.5 | Quercetin glucoside (Niemetz and Gross, 2001) Verbascoside (Sun et al., 2015) |
| 4 | 5.1 | 340 | 593 | 285-162 | 4.7 | 133.9 ± 1.06 | Kaempferolrutinoside (Eyles et al., 2007) |
| 5 | 5.3 | 340-360 | 447 | 285-447 | 1.25 | 123.8 ± 0.68 | Kaempferol glucoside (Eyles et al., 2007) |
| 6 | 5.8 | 280 | 539 | 275-307-377-232 | 143.14 | 539.3 ± 19.2 | Oleuropein (Sun et al., 2015) |
| 7 | 6.3 | 280 | 523 | 291-223 | 9.21 | 147.1 ± 1.02 | Ligstroside (Sun et al., 2015) |
Identification of phenolic compounds in aqueous ethyl acetate of bark extract of F. angustifolia using retention times, LC-MS and UV data.
| Peak | RT (min) | UV max(nm) | m/z | Aires | (mg eq quercetin kg−1 extract) | Identification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [M-H−] | MS/MS− | ||||||
| 1 | 1.4 | 285 | 375 | 152-122-167 | 62.12 | 78.5 ± 7.37 | Unknown |
| 2 | 2.2 | 340 | 339 | 177 | 80.97 | 92.8 ± 3.33 | Esculin (Frison-Norrie and Sporns, 2002) |
| 3 | 2.7 | 265 | 417 | 161-368-207 | 174.39 | 163.9 ± 14.9 | Unknown |
| 4 | 3.4 | 285-340 | 369 | 206-162 | 263.07 | 231.4 ± 10.2 | Fraxin (Frison-Norrie and Sporns, 2002) |
| 5 | 3.8 | 330 | 429 | 208-162-221-383-369-206 | 29.94 | 54.02 ± 4.29 | Unknown |
| 6 | 3.8 | 285-340 | 429 | 206-177-383-223 | 41.48 | 62.8 ± 5.09 | Unknown |
| 7 | 4.5 | 280 | 535 | 373 | 41.83 | 63.07 ± 4.5 | Pinoresinol(Frison-Norrie and Sporns, 2002) |
| 8 | 4.6 | 285-328 | 477 | 161-315 | 60.63 | 77.3 ± 14.7 | Calcelarioside(Frison-Norrie and Sporns, 2002) |
| 9 | 4.9 | 280-330 | 623 | 461-162 | 49.30 | 68.75 ± 9.1 | Verbascoside (Sun et al., 2015) |
| 10 | 5 | 285-328 | 477 | 133-161-315 | 186.38 | 173.08 ± 1.3 | Calcelarioside(Frison-Norrie and Sporns, 2002) |
| 11 | 5.1 | 280-328 | 685 | 291-361-523 | 91.73 | 101.04 ± 6.7 | Ligstroside hexoside (Sanz et al., 2012) |
Figure 3Inhibition of the NADH oxidase activity of XDH by HPLC fractions obtained from ethyl acetate leaves (LFA) (A), aqueous ethyl acetate bark (BFA) (B) extracts of F. angustifolia.
Effects of F. angustifolia extracts and DPI on serum uric acid levels, Xanthine dehydrogenase and on NADH oxidase activities in normal mice.
| Groups | Treatment | Dose (mg kg−1 b.w.) | Uric acid reduction(%) | Serum uric acid levels (mg dL−1) | XDH (nmol uric acid mg−1 protein) | XDH Inhibition (%) | NADH oxidase (Umg-1 protein) | NADH oxidaseInhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GI | Negative control | - | - | 3.1 ± 0.03*** | - | - | ||
| GII | Hyper uricemic control | - | - | 4.6 ± 0.04*** | - | - | ||
| GIII | DPI | 10 | 88.89 | 0.35 ± 0.003 | 0.91 ± 0.14 | 50.26 | 4.77 ± 0.002 | 69.57 |
| GIV | LFA | 100 | 40.18 | 1.9 ± 0.04*** | 1.32 ± 0.07 | 21.77 | 3.02 ± 0.1*** | 72.92 |
| GIV | LFA | 200 | 34.49 | 2.07 ± 0.03*** | 2.05 ± 0.06*** | 17.52 | 4 ± 0.14*** | 64.23 |
| GV | BFA | 100 | 42.08 | 1.8 ± 0.01*** | 1.79 ± 0.01*** | 33.52 | 6.3 ± 0.002*** | 59.88 |
| GV | BFA | 200 | 30.69 | 2.19 ± 0.01*** | 1.97 ± 0.28*** | 11.10 | 5.52 ± 0.04*** | 59.06 |
| GVI | Rutin | 10 | - | - | 1.83 ± 0.03*** | 25.13 | 3.95 ± 0.09*** | 67.74 |
| GVII | Luteolin | 10 | - | - | 1.26 ± 0.06 | 29.21 | 5.07 ± 0.06*** | 48.66 |
| GVIII | Esculin | 10 | 84.91 | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 1.30 ± 0.08 | 41.29 | 6.01 ± 0.07*** | 54.36 |
Data are presented as means ± SEM, n = 6. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett multiple comparison test was used for statistical significance. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 when compared with normal control values. LFA = F. angustifolia leaf ethyl acetate extract; BFA= F. angustifolia bark aqueous ethyl acetate extract; ANOVA = analysis of variance; SEM = standard error of the mean. Animal groups are as follows: Group I, negative control; Group II, hyperuricemic control; Group III, diphenyliodonium (DPI) treated group; Group IV, 100 mg kg−1 b.w. F. angustifolia LFA-treated group; 200 mg kg−1 b.w. F. angustifolia LFA extract-treated group; Group V, 100 mg kg−1 b.w. F. angustifolia BFA extract-treated group; 200 mg kg−1 b.w. F. angustifolia BFA-treated group; Group VI, 10 mg kg−1 rutin-treated group; Group VII, 10 mg kg−1 luteolin-treated group; Group VIII, 10 mg kg−1 Esculin-treated group.
Effect of F. angustifolia extracts and DPI on serum uric acid levels, xanthine dehydrogenase, and on NADH oxidase activities in mice pretreated with the uricase inhibitor, potassium oxonate.
| Groups | Treatment | Dose (mg kg−1 b.w.) | Uric acid reduction (%) | Serum uric acid levels (mg dL−1) | XDH (nmol uric acid mg−1 protein) | XDH Inhibition (%) | NADH oxidase (U mg−1 protein) | NADH oxidase Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GI | Negative control | - | - | 3.16 ± 0.03*** | - | - | ||
| GII | Hyper uricemic control | - | - | 4.67 ± 0.04*** | - | - | ||
| GIII | DPI | 10 | 78.84 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 1.54 ± 0.11 | 48.35 | 2.69 ± 0.03 | 72.12 |
| GIV | LFA | 100 | 56.95 | 2.01 ± 0.04*** | 2.02 ± 0.24 | 38.59 | 1.9 ± 0.002*** | 75.43 |
| LFA | 200 | 57.10 | 2 ± 0.01*** | 2.87 ± 0.013* | 11.86 | 3.25 ± 0.08*** | 60.34 | |
| GV | BFA | 100 | 57.38 | 1.9 ± 0.001*** | 1.85 ± 0,78 | 36.84 | 4.68 ± 0.08*** | 51.32 |
| BFA | 200 | 53.10 | 2.32 ± 0.03*** | 2.99 ± 0.13* | 23.21 | 6.05 ± 0.1*** | 49.2 | |
| GVI | Rutin | 10 | - | - | 1.49 ± 0.046 | 40.43 | 4.03 ± 0.1*** | 59.73 |
| GVII | Luteolin | 10 | - | - | 2.97 ± 0.048* | 30.75 | 4.46 ± 0.05*** | 52.69 |
| GVIII | Esculin | 10 | 78.94 | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 1.10 ± 0.03 | 49.98 | 3.18 ± 0.03*** | 68.27 |
Data are presented as means ± SD, n = 3. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett multiple comparison test was used for statistical significance. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 when compared with normal control values. LFA = F. angustifolia leaf ethyl acetate extract; BFA = F. angustifolia bark aqueous ethyl acetate extract. Animal groups are as follows: Group I, negative control; Group II, hyperuricemic control; Group III, diphenyliodonium (DPI) treated group; Group IV, 100 mg kg−1 b.w. F. angustifolia LFA-treated group; 200 mg kg−1 b.w. F. angustifolia LFA extract-treated group; Group V, 100 mg kg−1 b.w. F. angustifolia BFA extract-treated group; 200 mg kg−1 b.w. F. angustifolia BFA-treated group; Group VI, mg kg−1 rutintreated group; and Group VII, 10 mg kg−1 luteolin-treated group; Group VIII, 10 mg kg−1 Esculin-treated group.
Figure 4Structure of calcelarioside (A), esculin (B), kaempferol rutinoside (C), and DPI (D).