Erin Gibson1, Michelle Monje. 1. Division of Neuro-oncology, Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Modern cancer therapies have allowed for a dramatic increase in the survival rates in both children and adults. However, a frequent and unfortunate side-effect of cancer therapy is a long-term decline in neurocognitive function. Specifically, cranial radiation therapy markedly alters memory processes, while chemotherapeutic agents are correlated with deficits in attention, concentration, and speed of information processing. Here, we describe the putative cellular etiologies of cancer treatment-induced cognitive decline, with an emphasis on the role of neural stem and precursor cell dysfunction. RECENT FINDINGS: New studies highlight the lasting effects of chemotherapy on memory, executive function, attention, and speed of information processing up to 20 years following chemotherapy. Cognitive decrements are associated with decreased white-matter integrity as well as alterations in stem cell function in humans and rodent models of cancer therapy. Genetic polymorphisms may underlie differential sensitivity of certain individuals to the neurological consequences of chemotherapy. Increasing data support the concept that disruption of normal neural stem and precursor cell function is an important causative factor for the cognitive deficits that result from cancer therapy in both children and adults. SUMMARY: Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of chemotherapy on cell-intrinsic processes and cellular microenvironments. Further, the effects of the new generation of targeted molecular therapies on neural stem and progenitor cell function remains largely untested. Understanding the mechanisms behind cancer therapy-induced damage to neural stem and precursor cell populations will elucidate neuroprotective and cell replacement strategies aimed at preserving cognition after cancer therapy.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Modern cancer therapies have allowed for a dramatic increase in the survival rates in both children and adults. However, a frequent and unfortunate side-effect of cancer therapy is a long-term decline in neurocognitive function. Specifically, cranial radiation therapy markedly alters memory processes, while chemotherapeutic agents are correlated with deficits in attention, concentration, and speed of information processing. Here, we describe the putative cellular etiologies of cancer treatment-induced cognitive decline, with an emphasis on the role of neural stem and precursor cell dysfunction. RECENT FINDINGS: New studies highlight the lasting effects of chemotherapy on memory, executive function, attention, and speed of information processing up to 20 years following chemotherapy. Cognitive decrements are associated with decreased white-matter integrity as well as alterations in stem cell function in humans and rodent models of cancer therapy. Genetic polymorphisms may underlie differential sensitivity of certain individuals to the neurological consequences of chemotherapy. Increasing data support the concept that disruption of normal neural stem and precursor cell function is an important causative factor for the cognitive deficits that result from cancer therapy in both children and adults. SUMMARY: Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of chemotherapy on cell-intrinsic processes and cellular microenvironments. Further, the effects of the new generation of targeted molecular therapies on neural stem and progenitor cell function remains largely untested. Understanding the mechanisms behind cancer therapy-induced damage to neural stem and precursor cell populations will elucidate neuroprotective and cell replacement strategies aimed at preserving cognition after cancer therapy.
Authors: Kathryn R Tringale; Tanya T Nguyen; Roshan Karunamuni; Tyler Seibert; Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Michael Connor; Vitali Moiseenko; Mary Kay Gorman; Anisa Marshall; Michelle Devereux Tibbs; Nikdokht Farid; Daniel Simpson; Parag Sanghvi; Carrie R McDonald; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Erin M Gibson; Surya Nagaraja; Alfonso Ocampo; Lydia T Tam; Lauren S Wood; Praveen N Pallegar; Jacob J Greene; Anna C Geraghty; Andrea K Goldstein; Lijun Ni; Pamelyn J Woo; Ben A Barres; Shane Liddelow; Hannes Vogel; Michelle Monje Journal: Cell Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Melanie J Sekeres; Lily Riggs; Alexandra Decker; Cynthia B de Medeiros; Agnes Bacopulos; Jovanka Skocic; Kamila Szulc-Lerch; Eric Bouffet; Brian Levine; Cheryl L Grady; Donald J Mabbott; Sheena A Josselyn; Paul W Frankland Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Matthew D Li; Terry C Burns; Sunny Kumar; Alexander A Morgan; Steven A Sloan; Theo D Palmer Journal: Glia Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 7.452
Authors: Joseph Scafidi; Jonathan Ritter; Brooke M Talbot; Jorge Edwards; Li-Jin Chew; Vittorio Gallo Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: R Auvergne; C Wu; A Connell; S Au; A Cornwell; M Osipovitch; A Benraiss; S Dangelmajer; H Guerrero-Cazares; A Quinones-Hinojosa; S A Goldman Journal: Oncogene Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Alona Zer; Gregory R Pond; Albiruni R Abdul Razak; Kattleya Tirona; Hui K Gan; Eric X Chen; Brian O'Sullivan; John Waldron; David P Goldstein; Ilan Weinreb; Andrew J Hope; John J Kim; Kelvin K W Chan; Andrew K Chan; Lillian L Siu; Lori J Bernstein Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 6.223