Literature DB >> 31408649

Post-acquisition processing confounds in brain volumetric quantification of white matter hyperintensities.

Ahmed A Bahrani1, Omar M Al-Janabi2, Erin L Abner3, Shoshana H Bardach4, Richard J Kryscio5, Donna M Wilcock6, Charles D Smith7, Gregory A Jicha8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disparate research sites using identical or near-identical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition techniques often produce results that demonstrate significant variability regarding volumetric quantification of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) in the aging population. The sources of such variability have not previously been fully explored. NEW
METHOD: 3D FLAIR sequences from a group of randomly selected aged subjects were analyzed to identify sources-of-variability in post-acquisition processing that can be problematic when comparing WMH volumetric data across disparate sites. The methods developed focused on standardizing post-acquisition protocol processing methods to develop a protocol with less than 0.5% inter-rater variance.
RESULTS: A series of experiments using standard MRI acquisition sequences explored post-acquisition sources-of-variability in the quantification of WMH volumetric data. Sources-of-variability included: the choice of image center, software suite and version, thresholding selection, and manual editing procedures (when used). Controlling for the identified sources-of-variability led to a protocol with less than 0.5% variability between independent raters in post-acquisition WMH volumetric quantification. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Post-acquisition processing techniques can introduce an average variance approaching 15% in WMH volume quantification despite identical scan acquisitions. Understanding and controlling for such sources-of-variability can reduce post-acquisition quantitative image processing variance to less than 0.5%. DISCUSSION: Considerations of potential sources-of-variability in MRI volume quantification techniques and reduction in such variability is imperative to allow for reliable cross-site and cross-study comparisons.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebrovascular disease; Sources of variability; Volumetric analysis; White matter hyperintensity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31408649      PMCID: PMC6746343          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  33 in total

1.  Visual rating scales for age-related white matter changes (leukoaraiosis): can the heterogeneity be reduced?

Authors:  Leonardo Pantoni; Michela Simoni; Giovanni Pracucci; Reinhold Schmidt; Frederik Barkhof; Domenico Inzitari
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI.

Authors:  F Ségonne; A M Dale; E Busa; M Glessner; D Salat; H K Hahn; B Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Reliability of brain volumes from multicenter MRI acquisition: a calibration study.

Authors:  Hugo G Schnack; Neeltje E M van Haren; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; Marco Picchioni; Matthias Weisbrod; Heinrich Sauer; Tyrone Cannon; Matti Huttunen; Robin Murray; René S Kahn
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Probabilistic segmentation of white matter lesions in MR imaging.

Authors:  Petronella Anbeek; Koen L Vincken; Matthias J P van Osch; Robertus H C Bisschops; Jeroen van der Grond
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Measuring longitudinal white matter changes: comparison of a visual rating scale with a volumetric measurement.

Authors:  D M J van den Heuvel; V H ten Dam; A J M de Craen; F Admiraal-Behloul; A C G M van Es; W M Palm; A Spilt; E L E M Bollen; G J Blauw; L Launer; R G J Westendorp; M A van Buchem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  A fully automated method for quantifying and localizing white matter hyperintensities on MR images.

Authors:  Minjie Wu; Caterina Rosano; Meryl Butters; Ellen Whyte; Megan Nable; Ryan Crooks; Carolyn C Meltzer; Charles F Reynolds; Howard J Aizenstein
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  The topography of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI in healthy 60- to 64-year-old individuals.

Authors:  Wei Wen; Perminder Sachdev
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Interaction of medial temporal lobe atrophy and white matter hyperintensities in AD.

Authors:  W M van der Flier; H A M Middelkoop; A W E Weverling-Rijnsburger; F Admiraal-Behloul; A Spilt; E L E M Bollen; R G J Westendorp; M A van Buchem
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Quantitative comparison of four brain extraction algorithms.

Authors:  Kristi Boesen; Kelly Rehm; Kirt Schaper; Sarah Stoltzner; Roger Woods; Eileen Lüders; David Rottenberg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of atrophy in Alzheimer's disease: cross-validation of BSI, SIENA and SIENAX.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Anil Rao; Nicola De Stefano; Mark Jenkinson; Jonathan M Schott; Paul M Matthews; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development of a protocol to assess within-subject, regional white matter hyperintensity changes in aging and dementia.

Authors:  Ahmed A Bahrani; Charles D Smith; Justin M Barber; Omar M Al-Janabi; David K Powell; Anders H Andersen; Brandon D Ramey; Erin L Abner; Larry B Goldstein; Zachary Winder; Brian T Gold; Linda Van Eldik; Donna M Wilcock; Gregory A Jicha
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.987

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.